We make fun of other companies' poor product-naming choices, but are we really doing that much better over here in Apple-land?
This glorious paragraph had to be in a product announcement's press release — in the main body text!
We make fun of other companies' poor product-naming choices, but are we really doing that much better over here in Apple-land?
This glorious paragraph had to be in a product announcement's press release — in the main body text!
@shac @marcoarment I think that might be purposeful. They really try to reinforce the iPad, Apple Watch, iPhone etc. “Call it what it is” instead of, say, a “Mac Quadra 840av”.
While does cause a bit of confusion, it constantly reinforces a single product name instead of many model names. Apple hates specs - they want to compete on overall experience, not specific device model internals.
@marcoarment
Apple is slowly turning into their caricature of the PC guy in those old ads. Product names, security warnings…
@tobyx
Apple Watch
Apple Watch Series 1 AND 2 (so everyone comically refers to the original as Series 0 now, because you can't use "1" twice)
... Series 3
... Series 4
... Series 5
… Series 6 and SE (1st gen)
... Series 7
… Series 8 and SE (2nd gen)
... Ultra
... Series 9 and Ultra 2
Maybe not the best ever, no. Which SE do I have? Is it better or worse than the Series NN? When you say Apple Watch 1, do you mean SERIES 1 or the FIRST one? Wait, you're saying there was an Apple Watch Zero?!
😂😉
@leoncowle Well I did say after the “Series” naming came along :D
To me, Series, SE, and Ultra are three lines.
If you want the best normal Apple Watch, get the Series. And it’s numbered.
If you are budget-conscious, get the SE. And it’s numbered.
If you want the best active outdoorsy sturdiest Apple Watch, get the Ultra. And it’s numbered.
Those are not to be compared with each other anyway.
@leoncowle People say Steve Jobs would not let such a mess continue, but then we need to remember skipping iPhone “2”, and instead having an iPhone 3G as the 2nd one, the suddenly going to 4... ahhh (I guess there was a 3GS snuck in there).
For iPads, now that the regular iPad has the shape of an iPad Air or iPad Pro, I am totally confused. I actually need to look at the chart if anyone asks me a question about the lineup. :D
@tobyx Bbbbbut the ‘S' was for speeeeeeed, Tobias!! 😂
LOL. Indeed. I wouldn't let kindergarteners learn counting from Apple product lines 😂
@marcoarment The problem is that they probably didn't know they wanted to bifurcate the line when the second generation came out. If they did, they would have called it “Apple Pencil Pro” and then you could at least have something like…
Apple Pencil Pro
Apple Pencil (USB-C)
Apple Pencil (Lightening)
Still not perfect, but way better than what they have now.
@marcoarment Yes, they say accountants hide things in the footnotes. Apple product naming tries to be simple but hides a lot of complexity and nuance between the parenthesis.
I wouldn't be surprised if they release Apple Pencil Pro with the next round of pro iPads, which would have USB-C charging and the features missing from what they announced today.
@marcoarment Agree. Why can’t Apple just adopt the car company system? 2021-2023 iPad, iPad Air, iPad Pro, etc. They already use internal model numbers, why not simply use those for the enthusiasts? “Oh that’s an iPad A2696.”
It gets especially screwy with iPad Pro because the 12.9” is two generations ahead. It’s so confusing when trying to buy/sell one of these things in the aftermarket. I don’t understand why Apple continues this madness yet calls iPhone by number.