@chfour @jk The dumb irony is that in most places, terrestrial radio or cell towers are cost prohibitive. How can it possibly be that putting 12,000 satellites into orbit is the most cost-effective manoeuvre?
I’ve got friends that use it because it’s the best service available - their options are $400/month 4G, or 3Mbps DSL for $50. Given those choices, $160/month for 100Mbit Satellite seems great.
Pure vandalism!
@jk
"I don't care, I'm still free,
You can't take the sky from me."
Musk: hold my beer
I fear when they start crashing into other stuff. Starlink doubled or tripled the amount of sats up there, and the more sats there are, the easier for a chain reaction of destruction to happen. And if that happens, nothing can safely leave Earth Orbit for thousands of years.
That‘s the plan: the rubble will darken earth and the climate will cool down. Hail Elon.
Please hackers, change them to #spacejunk
Last boost:
a family member talked about seeing a "shooting star" and I didn't have the heart to tell them what it probably was
@jk But #IridiumFlares were considered bad...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fU48qn-iJ0I
Oh well...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_flare#Iridium_flares
Attached: 1 video the easiest way to become radicalized about astronomy is to open a stargazing app and to make it highlight Starlink satellites