Don’t supersize me: The case for small electric cars instead of big SUVs
Small cars are good for us but bad for business.
Don’t supersize me: The case for small electric cars instead of big SUVs
Small cars are good for us but bad for business.
Vehicle size is relative, like financial disparity or privilege.
The SparkEV is tiny in comparison, but I can comfortably fit 4 adults or two plus two carseats, and four full grocery bags, but with only a 19KWh battery to lug around. Three more bags if it's carseats and I can use the rear floor. With the seats down I haul furniture, farm supplies, etc. It's not roomy but not really cramped either due to clever use of space.
Vehicular utility depends heavily on design and technique plus expectations. I'm not saying you should use a tiny car for your two-child family needs, but I could (and did).
@Panopticola @arstechnica I'll take your word for it, though from what I've seen of the Spark I'm not sure I'd describe it as "comfortable".
It's certainly true that the SparkEV could be a perfectly good vehicle for some use cases though. Of course even the SparkEV was over $20K if I recall correctly.
Comfort is an extremely relative term, of course. What I mean by that is the surprising leg and headroom in the back. (To clarify, our household members are somewhat average height and mass for canadians.) It's only a 4-seater, so the width is enough as well. The materials are cheap but the seat design is good enough for a day trip, better than many I've had over the years. Not as good as any Mercedes. Better than a Jetta and Escort and any of the trucks or vans I've had.
The ergonomics are pretty good (operability is a comfort thing to me). Large knobs for HVAC, good steering wheel controls, and the wheel comfort itself is great.
The infotainment system is obsolete and painful. Uncomfortable. The dash is pretty usable.
EV costs are high yep but the topic is size optimization for efficiency. Short range batteries and lighter cars means less energy usage all around. If you must use a car, that is.
We're all going on energy diets eh, like it or not.
Uh, and to further clarify where I think we're at if one can afford an EV but aren't rich, we use the 130km range EV for all the short trips, which is the vast majority of them, but sometimes, like yesterday, we need to move 4 or 5 adults and a bunch of supplies, over 150 km, so we have an old CRV for that. If we didn't live in the hilly countryside we'd probably have a sedan or hatchback.
Transition communities and economies are our best hope for survival: evolving but progressive shifts in lifestyle and culture, as rapidly as possible replacing whatever inefficiencies and excess we can.
Maybe don't replace it yet? Seems odd to say but it depends on a lot of variables.
Our 20-year old mini-SUV is more utility than sport and it has lots of life left in it still. Sometimes we really need it, but the daily trips are usually under 50 km so the EV does all of the commute and errands.
If you wait a little longer the options will be much better, and you will be creating less demand in the meantime. Prices are coming down and production is coming online.
I know many people love their hybrids but EV design simplicity is one of the main attractions for me.
Undeniably true. Cars so tall that you can't see a child standing in front of you are horrifying. They are so heavy that no pedestrian can survive if you hit them. They cost so much because of all the extra materials. It's a horrifying arms race to stay "safe" when in reality, we're killing ourselves.
@arstechnica This reminds me of when I lived in Phoenix in the 90s... Nothing but massive trucks and SUVs on the road, and it was extremely rare to see more than one person in them. They could carry an army, but it was always just one person behind the wheel, engulfed by an absurdly large vehicle.
These people pay monstrous amounts of $$$ to fill their ridiculous, unnecessary beasts with gas...which of course they *always* complain about. It's crappy, but the #schadenfreude is real...
@arstechnica I'd love a small car, but I have 3 little kids in various kinds of car seats. We own 1 car and it's a Honda CRV, the smallest, most efficient, single vehicle that can fit 3 car seats, and then only *just* barely.
I'd love an article on options for people like my family. Car seats of some kind (infant, full seats, boosters) are *required* here up through age 8 so it's not just waiting out a year or two either.
@brnrd @arstechnica Your picture is of an early 90s Phase 2 Renault 5. The pink thing in the OP is a prototype Renault 5 from the early 70s.
The R5 was replaced by the Clio in the early 90s, now on their 5th or 6th generation, and about to be replaced by the all-EV Renault 5.
Perhaps when more severe climate change affects more americans they may start to think differently about their "love affair with massive cars" lifestyle.
@arstechnica I wonder if a manufacturer-level incentive that goes carrot/stick based on a model's weight relative to a rolling average of vehicle size could successfully nudge things in the right direction. I.e. A vehicle sold that's under the average size nets the manufacturer a subsidy, whereas a vehicle over that average incurs a penalty relative to its deviation from the average.
Also wonder whether volumetric might be a better tool for reigning in size rather than weight.
@arstechnica the link in the article for the [The electric 2020 Mini Cooper SE: Big driving fun, little driving]( https://arstechnica.com/cars/2020/05/the-electric-2020-mini-cooper-se-big-driving-fun-little-driving-range/ ) sounds much better than I might have expected.
Now, if I could just get one without an insecure, privacy invading, payment extracting, head unit, I might actually consider one. Then again, it's pretty heard to find any new cars that aren't equipped like that 😡
Loks like a Renault 5…
@arstechnica right now, the car I want is the Fiat 500e. That and the electric Smart models fit my needs.
But really, all I really want is more buses and commuter rail so I don't have to drive at all.