As with other copyright expansions - 40 years' worth of them now - this right will be immediately transferred to the highly concentrated media sector, who will simply amend their standard, non-negotiable contracting terms to require that "training rights" be irrevocably assigned to them as a condition of working.

8/

The real solution isn't to treat artists as atomic individuals - LLCs with an MFA - who bargain, B2B, with corporations. Rather, the solutions are in collective power, like unions. You've probably heard about the #SAGAFTRA actors' strike, in which creative workers are bargaining as a group to demand fair treatment in an age of generative models. SAG-AFTRA president #FranDrescher's speech announcing the strike made me want to stand up and salute:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4SAPOX7R5M

9/

The actors' strike is historic: it marks the first time actors have struck since 2000, and it's the first time actors and *writers* have co-struck since 1960. Of course, writers in Writers Guild of America (west and east) have been picketing since since April, and one of their best spokespeople has been @adamconover, a WGA board member who serves on the negotiating committee.

10/

Conover is best known for his stellar #AdamRuinsEverything comedy-explainer TV show, which pioneered a technique for breaking down complex forms of corporate fuckery and making you laugh while he does it. Small wonder that he's been so effective at conveying the strike issues while he pickets.

11/

Writing for #Jacobin, #AlexNPress profiles Conover and interviews him about the strike, under the *excellent* headline, "Adam Pickets Everything." Conover is characteristically funny, smart, and incisive - do read:

https://jacobin.com/2023/07/adam-conover-wga-strike

Of course, not everyone in Hollywood is striking. In late June, the #DGA accepted a studio deal with an anemic 41% vote turnout:

https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/26/23773926/dga-amptp-new-deal-strike

12/

They probably shouldn't have. In this interview with *#TheAmericanProspect*'s #PeterHong, the brilliant documentary director #AmyZiering breaks down how #Netflix and the other streamers have rugged documentarians in a classic #enshittification ploy that lured in filmmakers, extracted everything they had, and then discarded the husks:

https://prospect.org/culture/2023-06-21-drowned-in-the-stream/

13/

Now, the streaming cartel stands poised to all but kill off documentary filmmaking. Pressured by Wall Street to drive high returns, they've become ultraconservative in their editorial decisions, making programs and films that are as similar as possible to existing successes, that are unchallenging, and that are *cheap*. We've gone directly from a golden age of docs to a dark age.

In a time of monopolies, it's tempting to form countermonopolies to keep them in check.

14/

Yesterday, I wrote about why the #FTC and #LinaKhan were right to try to block the #MicrosoftActivision merger, and I heard from a lot of people saying this merger was the only way to check #Sony's reign of terror over video games:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/14/making-good-trouble/#the-peoples-champion

But replacing one monopolist with another isn't good for anyone (except the monopolists' shareholders). If we want audiences and workers - and society - to benefit, we have to *de-monopolize* the sector.

15/

Last month, I published a series with @eff about how we should save the #news from #BigTech:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/saving-news-big-tech

After that came out, the *EU Observer* asked me to write up version of it with direct reference to the #EU, where there are a lot of (in my opinion, ill-conceived but well-intentioned) efforts to pry Big Tech's boot off the news media's face. I'm really happy with how it came out, and the header graphic is *awesome*:

https://euobserver.com/opinion/157187

16/

De-monopolizing tech has become my life's work, both because tech is foundational (tech is how we organize to fight over #labor, #gender and #race equality, and #ClimateJustice), and because tech has all of these *technical* aspects, which open up new avenues for shrinking Big Tech, without waiting decades for traditional #antitrust breakups to run their course (we need these too, though!).

17/

I've written a book laying out a shovel-ready plan to give tech back to its users through #interoperability, explaining how to make new regulations (and reform old ones), what they should say, how to enforce them, and how to detect and stop cheating. It's called "The Internet Con: How To Seize the Means of Computation" and it's coming from #VersoBooks this September:

https://www.versobooks.com/products/3035-the-internet-con

18/

I just got my first copy in the mail yesterday, and it's a gorgeous little package. The timing was great, because I spent the whole week in the studio at #SkyboatMedia recording the audiobook - the first audiobook of mine that I've narrated. It was a fantastic experience, and I'll be launching a #Kickstarter to presell the #DRMFree audio and ebooks as well as hardcovers, in a couple weeks.

18/

Though I like doing these crowdfunders, I do them because I *have* to. #Amazon's #Audible division, the monopolist that controls >90% of the #audiobook market, refuses to carry my work because it is DRM-free. When you buy a DRM-free audiobook, that means that you can play it on *anyone's* app, not just Amazon's.

19/

Every audiobook you've ever bought from Audible will disappear the moment you decide to break up with Amazon, which means that Amazon can absolutely *screw* authors and audiobook publishers because they've taken our customers hostage.

If you are unwise enough to pursue an #MBA, you will learn a term of art for this kind of market structure: it's a "#moat," that is, an element of the market that makes it hard for new firms to enter the market and compete with you.

20/

#WarrenBuffett pioneered the use of this term, and now it's all but mandatory for anyone launching a business or new product to explain where *their* moat will come from.

As #DanDavies writes, these "moats" aren't really moats in the Buffett sense. With Coke and Disney, he says, a "moat" was "the fact that nobody else could make such a great product that everyone wanted." In other words, "making a good product," is a great moat:

https://backofmind.substack.com/p/stuck-in-the-moat

21/

But making a good product is a lot of work and not everyone is capable of it. Instead, "moat" now just means some form of lock in. Davies counsels us to replace "moat" with:

> our subscription system and proprietary interface mean that our return on capital is protected by a strong Berlin Wall, preventing our customers from getting out to a freer society and forcing them to consume our inferior products for lack of alternative.

22/

I really like this. It pairs well with my 2020 observation that the fight over whether "IP" is a meaningful term can be settled by recognizing that IP has a precise meaning in business: "Any policy that lets me reach beyond the walls of my firm to control the conduct of my competitors, critics and customers":

https://locusmag.com/2020/09/cory-doctorow-ip/

23/

To see how that works in the real world, check out "The Anti-Ownership Ebook Economy," a magisterial piece of scholarship from #SarahLamdan, #JasonSchultz, #MichaelWeinberg and #ClaireWoodcock:

https://www.nyuengelberg.org/outputs/the-anti-ownership-ebook-economy/

> Something happened when we shifted to digital formats that created a loss of rights for readers. Pulling back the curtain on the evolution of ebooks offers some clarity to how the shift to digital left ownership behind in the analog world.

24/

The research methodology combines both anonymous and named sources in publishing, bookselling and librarianship, as well as expert legal and economic analysis. This is an eminently readable, extremely smart, and really useful contribution to the scholarship on how "IP" (in the modern sense) has transformed books from something you own to something that you can *never* own.

25/

The truth is, capitalists hate capitalism. Inevitably, the kind of person who presides over a giant corporation and wields power over millions of lives - workers, suppliers and customers - believes themselves to be uniquely and supremely qualified to be a wise dictator. For this kind of person, competition is "wasteful" and distracts them from the important business of making everyone's life better by handing down unilateral - but wise and clever - edits.

26/

Think of #PeterThiel's maxim, "competition is for losers."

That's why giant companies *love* to merge with each other, and buy out nascent competitors. By rolling up the power to decide how you and I and everyone else live our lives, these executives ensure that they can help us little people live the best lives possible.

27/

The traditional role of #antitrust enforcement is to prevent this from happening, countering the delusions of would-be life-tenured autocrats of trade with public accountability and enforcement:

https://marker.medium.com/we-should-not-endure-a-king-dfef34628153

Of course, for 40 years, we've had neoliberal, Reaganomics-poisoned antitrust, where monopolies are celebrated as "efficient" and their leaders exalted as geniuses whose commercial empires are evidence of merit, not savagery.

28/

That era is, thankfully, coming to an end, and not a moment too soon.

Leading the fight is the aforementioned FTC chair Lina Khan, who is taking *huge* swings at even bigger mergers. But the EU is no slouch in this department: they're challenging the #AdobeFigma merger, a $20b transaction that is obviously and solely designed to recapture customers who left Adobe because they didn't want to struggle under its yoke any longer:

https://gizmodo.com/adobe-figma-acquisition-likely-to-face-eu-investigation-1850555562

29/

For autocrats of trade, this is an intolerable act of disloyalty. We owe them our fealty and subservience, because they are self-evidently better at understanding what we need than we could ever be. This unwarranted self-confidence from the ordinary mediocrities who end up running giant tech companies gets them into a whole lot of hot water.

30/

One keen observer of the mind-palaces that tech leaders trap themselves in is @anildash, who describes the conspiratorial, far-right turn of the most powerful men (almost all men!) in #SiliconValley in a piece called "'#VCQanon' and the radicalization of the tech tycoons":

https://www.anildash.com/2023/07/07/vc-qanon/

31/

Dash builds on an editorial he published in Feb, "The tech tycoon martyrdom charade," which explores the sense of victimhood the most powerful, wealthiest people in the Valley project:

https://www.anildash.com/2023/02/27/tycoon-martyrdom-charade/

These dudes are prisoners of their #GreatMan myth, and leads them badly astray. And while all of us are prone to lapses in judgment and discernment, Dash makes the case that tech leaders are *especially* prone to it:

32/

> Nobody becomes a billionaire by accident. You have to have wanted that level of power, control and wealth more than you wanted anything else in your life. They all sacrifice family, relationships, stability, community, connection, and belonging in service of keeping score on a scale that actually yields no additional real-world benefits on the path from that first $100 million to the tens of billions.

33/

This makes billionaires "a cohort that is, counterintutively, very easily manipulated." What's more, they're all master manipulators, and they all hang out with each other, which means that when a conspiratorial belief takes root in one billionaire's brain, it spreads to the rest of them like wildfire.

34/

Then, billionaires "push each other further and further into extreme ideas because their entire careers have been predicated on the idea that they're genius outliers who can see things others can't, and that their wealth is a reward for that imagined merit."

They live in privileged bubbles, which insulates them from disconfirming evidence - ironic, given how many of these bros think they are wise senators in the agora.

35/

There are examples of billionaires' folly all around us today, of course. Take #privacy: the idea that we can - we should - we *must* - spy on everyone, all the time, in every way, to eke out tiny gains in ad performance is objectively *batshit*. And yet, wealthy people decreed this should be so, and it was, and made them far richer.

36/

Leaked data from Microsoft's #Xandr ad-targeting database reveals how the commercial surveillance delusion led us to a bizarre and terrible place, as reported on by *#TheMarkup*:

https://themarkup.org/privacy/2023/06/08/from-heavy-purchasers-of-pregnancy-tests-to-the-depression-prone-we-found-650000-ways-advertisers-label-you

*The Markup's* report lets you plumb 650,000 targeting categories, searching by keyword or loading random sets, 20 at a time. Do you want to target gambling addicts, people taking depression meds or Jews? Xandr's got you covered. What could possibly go wrong?

37/

The Xandr files come from German security researcher @wchr from #CrackedLabs. Christi is a European, and he's working with the German digital rights group @netzpolitik_feed to get the EU to scrutinize all the ways that Xandr is flouting EU privacy laws.

38/

Billionaires' big ideas lead us astray in more tangible ways, of course. Writing in *TheConversation*, @johnquiggin asks us to take a hard look at the much ballyhooed (and *expensively* ballyhooed) "#NuclearRenaissance":

https://theconversation.com/dutton-wants-australia-to-join-the-nuclear-renaissance-but-this-dream-has-failed-before-209584

Despite the rhetoric, nukes aren't cheap, and they aren't coming back.

39/

Georgia's new nuclear power is behind schedule and over budget, but it's still better off than South Carolina's nukes, which were so over budget that they were abandoned in 2017. France's nuke is a decade behind schedule. Finland's opened this year - 14 years late. The UK's #HinkleyPointC reactor is massively behind schedule and over budget (and when it's done, it will be owned by the French government!).

40/

China's nuclear success story also doesn't hold up to scrutiny - they've brought 50GW of nukes online, sure, but they're building 95-120GW of solar *every year*.

Solar is the clear winner here, along with other renewables, which are plummeting in cost (while nukes soar) and are accelerating in deployments (while nukes are plagued with ever-worsening delays).

41/

This is the second nuclear renaissance - the last one, 20 years ago, was a bust, and that was *before* renewables got cheap, reliable and easy to manufacture and deploy. You'll hear fairy-tales about how the early 2000s bust was caused by political headwinds, but that's simply untrue: there were almost no anti-nuke marches then, and governments were scrambling to figure out low-carbon alternatives to fossil fuels (this was before the latest round of fossil fuel sabotage).

42/

The current renaissance is also doomed. Yes, new reactors are smaller and safer and won't have the problems intrinsic to all megaprojects, but designs like #VOYGR have virtually no signed deals. Even if they do get built, their capacity will be dwarfed by renewables - a Gen III nuke will generate 710MW of power. Globally, we add that much solar *every single day*.

43/

And solar power is *cheap*. Even after US subsidies, a Gen III reactor would charge A$132/MWh - current prices are as low as A$64-$114/MWh.

Nukes are getting a charm offensive because wealthy people are investing in hype as a way of reaping profits - not as a way of generating safe, cheap, reliable energy.

Here in the latest stage of capitalism, value and profit are fully decoupled.

44/

Monopolists are shifting more and more value from suppliers and customers to their shareholders every day. And when the customer is the government, the depravity knows no bounds. In *#ResponsibleStatecraft*, #ConnorEchols describes how military contractors like #Boeing are able to bill the #Pentagon $52,000 for a *trash can*:

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/06/20/the-pentagons-52000-trash-can/

45/

Military Beltway Bandits are nothing new, of course, but they've gotten far more virulent since the #Obama era, when Obama's #DoD demanded that the primary contractors merge to a bare handful of giant firms, in the name of "efficiency." As @ddayen writes in his must-read 2020 book *Monopolized*, this opened the door to a new kind of predator:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/01/29/fractal-bullshit/#dayenu

46/