@perpetualmystic @chadloder My entire profile on there is dedicated to dragging souls from the wreckage.
How is that going, you might ask?
I feel rather like a fly in the ointment. Just annoying people, most of the time. With occasional successes.
SMDH.
And its doubly insane that these journalists go out of their way to say they never read replies and acknowledge they get a trickle of click-thru traffic on twitter.
@chadloder @[email protected] Itâs not just journalists. Itâs publishers, itâs ad agencies, itâs politicians. Itâs anyone with no imagination or true core values.
Because itâs inconvenient.
@chadloder @[email protected] Well I would. The years I spent at a very large ad agency here in NYC, I was surrounded by the most liberal, smart, good-willed folks Iâd ever met. I also have some personal experience with top-level national Dems and their donors (everybody needs help with their Mac every now and then :). As for my publisher friends, Iâm working on it.
But somehow, itâs just impossible for them to see exactly where they are on the Nazi Germany calendar.
@chadloder @goodthinking @SarahDelahunty
Sigh
You would expect worker solidarity when the entire world of money and might are wholly committed to squeezing them for maximum productivity with minimum pay
But evidently everyone is susceptible to propaganda
Especially people specifically targeted and manipulated until their priorities are so screwed up that theyâd vote against healthcare and education for their children
@sentient_water The question is about implied endorsement, right? If you're a reporter for a DS subsidiary I think that implies something that using a platform like Twitter doesn't.
Using Twitter doesn't mean you wholeheartedly approve of e.g. what Twitter did to NPR in the way that reporting for DS means you embrace antisemitism, for example.
@ech @sentient_water Best case, solidarity with the journalism NPR represents would be ethical and show character.
From a selfish POV, theyâve had visibility downgraded in favor of the $8 gang and been demoted to same as RT in apparent credibility.
Bottom line, Twitter has become a figurative nazi bar. Itâs sad, but itâs happened and itâs escalating. Time for good people to pack up and leave.
@skry @sentient_water You are likely overstating the credibility hit :) (This place sort of self-selects for that, I realize.)
"show character" is kind of what I was getting at. It would be great if we could en-masse move everyone to a platform that was run reasonably. (This is one reason I'm here instead â protocols not platforms.) But we can't. Any journalist who does is likely just throwing a good chunk of their career/influence/etc away for infinitesimal practical benefit to the world. Is that really the hill you want journalists to choose? Think the journalists you'd consider most likely to do what you're asking for here: do you want them silenced for such little gain? I sure wouldn't.
<skip overwrought Nazi analogy>
@sentient_water @skry Yeah, that's probably the best thing for us to focus on: if content creators find that more and more people get their content from places other than crap-platforms, then crap-platforms will lose their status.
e.g. Doctorow: he publishes on his own site, fediverse, twitter, tumblr, wherever. I read him here. If I ever set up RSS again I'll probably just get it straight from his site's feed. The more people that do that instead of twitter, the more twitter withers away.
With respect the idea that journalism is a profession is a self serving myth spread by Journalists to avoid becoming professional - no oversight, no enforceable standards, or no criteria to be a journalist- so the likes of Fox News Journalists can exist . signed Journalist
@chadloder
I guess you are learning something about humans.
Twitter is going down anyway
can't remember what this syndrome is called, seems like it might be named after a scandinavian city
@chadloder The Click-Fil-A effect. âBut itâs so tasty!â
Being queer is always a matter of repeatedly getting smacked in the face that almost everyone you know would sell your soul to the devil for one (1) corn chip.
@chadloder
In the meantime, Musk removes #StateAffiliatedMedia tag from China, Iran and Russia State affiliated media....
@chadloder Start hammering on managing editors and EICs who may still be insisting on lousy performance measurements like Tweets per Day and Twitter Engagement.
And then hammer on the editor class for failing to develop a Plan B escape route which isn't tied to a walled garden social media platform (iow, Facebook/Instagram are not solutions).
Then circle around and pummel journalists for not having their personal Plan B set up: personal accounts off Twitter and in the fediverse.
@chadloder If you're a journalist (or any writer trying to increase eyeballs), don't you syndicate wherever you can to get more views? fb, twitter, lefty mastodon, righty mastodon, whoever will host your content for free, why not?
I mean, some outlets have an answer to "why not?", like NPR's "why not?" is that it can't use the platform without the platform calling them government propaganda or however it was phrased; free publishing in that context was deemed not worth the reputation hit etc.
Surely using the platform is implied endorsement of all of the companies actions.
Maybe your point is: if one journalist gets off twitter then that will ever-so-slightly push consumers off twitter â there's less to read there.
But I kinda think that won't work. Who will get off? Exactly the people who agree with you anyway about Twitter's actions despite being on twitter already. Like what's the point of that.