@CamWeck
I'm not sure it has to be an either/or. One can still enjoy Potter without agreeing with Rowling. (At least, if Stephen Fry can love Wagner's works despite knowing everything Wagner was, it's clearly possible.)
But I couldn't agree more. Pterry was a far better writer, and a lovely human being. (Though I may be a bit biased: been a fan since 1988 😁)
#Pratchett #Discworld
@WAHa_06x36 @EarlOfEmsworth @CamWeck
Rowling has also made her bigotry a front-and-center part of her public persona. Consuming HP media contributes to normalizing that bigotry; it's a statement that trans people don't matter, and advocating for our elimination is a personal peccadillo of no consequence.
@sphinx @WAHa_06x36 @CamWeck
...
"it's a statement that [Jews] don't matter" -- Yes, he was pretty clear on that.
"and advocating for our elimination is a personal peccadillo of no consequence." Has Rowling advocated for the elimination of trans people? Fuckin hell. I'd be up in arms too. What, like gas chambers, or...?
To be clear, I have zero interest in defending Rowling. I'm merely proposing that it's possible to separate the artist from the art, to enjoy some stories (even if the writing is mediocre) without agreeing with their author's every utterance, just as one might listen to Wagner or read Kipling without being disgusted by Jews or thinking British rule in India was a good thing. And hyperbole helps nobody.
... Unless it wasn't hyperbole, and Rowling really has advocated for the elimination of trans folks. I find it unlikely (I find it unlikely that I hadn't heard something of that magnitude -- it's very likely a criminal offence... but then I don't much care what she says, I'm a Pratchett fan), but if so I'm thoroughly sickened.
@WAHa_06x36 @CamWeck
That would assume that the plot and lyrics of Der Ring des Nibelungen are entirely disconnected from the views of Richard Wagner, which is just not true, and honestly would be a weird thing to believe.
Far more so than with Rowling. She's not exactly created a Gesamtkunstwerk, just some books.
@EarlOfEmsworth @CamWeck I am entirely happy with writing off the works of Wagner because he was a piece of shit, I don’t give a fuck about him.
But even so, the nature of the works means the two situations are not really comparable. And, again, Wagner is dead and buried. It’s a lot easier to argue for the death of the artist when the artist is, in fact, dead.
Plus entirely more relevant to the real world - just reading Going Postal and, oop, there's a nice explanation of leveraged buyouts.
@CamWeck
Pratchett will not appeal to *everyone* who is a former HP fan, but I mean, yeah, let's share him with as many people as possible.
Where Rowling's books are mean-spirited and cruel, Pratchett's are inviting and kind (and hilarious)
He has a few stumbles (I did not love how he wrote about a fat villain in one book, for instance), but I think with most of those things it's clear that if it were pointed out to him, he would genuinely have tried to do better.
@CamWeck At the risk of sounding like a total jerk, I would like to point out that there is a very simple solution to this problem...
Just buy all your Harry Potter books...used. Someone already bought these books. Nothing you do or do not do will put a single euro into the coffers of Ms. Rowling, if that is important to you.
When you buy a used book, the author gets nothing.
Same deal with libraries, and then you don't even have to pay for the books at all. (Or rather, you have already paid for them, via taxes, etc. You may as well enjoy them.)
(Mind you, if you feel uncomfortable even offering Rowling the "moral support" of reading her books, go ahead and read something else. There's plenty of excellent stuff out there. Discworld is awesome. I'm just saying the relationships between artist, work, and audience can be complicated and maybe, just maybe, it's all right to really love a story even if you think the author is a terrible person. Or an idiot.)
@CamWeck see... I tried. I read Colour of Magic and just... Didn't connect with any of the characters.
I've ditched Harry Potter entirely now because I just can't bring myself to read them any more despite having adored them since the start. However, I found I could connect and associate with many of Harry's difficulties at school (homework, relationships, bullying etc). With discworld, for me it was *too* disjointed from reality. I couldn't link to it.
@CamWeck https://lithub.com/heres-why-terry-pratchetts-daughter-and-neil-gaiman-are-fighting-with-transphobes-on-twitter/
He also directly debunked islamophobic BS in Jingo.
Most definetly in the category of most excellent of humans.
All of a sudden, scores of people on Twitter are speculating about the late Terry Pratchett’s feelings on gender. This discourse hasn’t arisen spontaneously—it’s because Neil Gaiman weighed in on a…
I prefer Anne McCaffrey . . but (almost) anything that can lure people away from devoting their entire lives to ... *checks notes*.. "thing they thought was cool long before the entire world knew how awful of a person the author actually is" would definitely be an improvement 🙂
@CamWeck
There's also the _His Dark Materials_ trilogy by Philip Pullman.
I have no idea about a lot of Pullman's beliefs, but the series is clearly against the use of religious institutions as tools of oppression, even if it doesn't clearly identify the villainous institution as a church.