@CamWeck
I'm not sure it has to be an either/or. One can still enjoy Potter without agreeing with Rowling. (At least, if Stephen Fry can love Wagner's works despite knowing everything Wagner was, it's clearly possible.)

But I couldn't agree more. Pterry was a far better writer, and a lovely human being. (Though I may be a bit biased: been a fan since 1988 😁)
#Pratchett #Discworld

@EarlOfEmsworth @CamWeck That would assume that the writing of the Harry Potter books are entirely disconnected from the views of JK Rowling, which is just not true, and honestly would be a weird thing to believe.

@WAHa_06x36 @EarlOfEmsworth @CamWeck

Rowling has also made her bigotry a front-and-center part of her public persona. Consuming HP media contributes to normalizing that bigotry; it's a statement that trans people don't matter, and advocating for our elimination is a personal peccadillo of no consequence.

@sphinx @WAHa_06x36 @CamWeck

To be clear, I have zero interest in defending Rowling. I'm merely proposing that it's possible to separate the artist from the art, to enjoy some stories (even if the writing is mediocre) without agreeing with their author's every utterance, just as one might listen to Wagner or read Kipling without being disgusted by Jews or thinking British rule in India was a good thing. And hyperbole helps nobody.

@sphinx @WAHa_06x36 @CamWeck

... Unless it wasn't hyperbole, and Rowling really has advocated for the elimination of trans folks. I find it unlikely (I find it unlikely that I hadn't heard something of that magnitude -- it's very likely a criminal offence... but then I don't much care what she says, I'm a Pratchett fan), but if so I'm thoroughly sickened.