"The fediverse isn't profitable"

Actually, the fediverse is a great place for artists and creators to find support for work they are passionate about and pour their soul into. It's just not profitable for multi-million dollar corporations that want to fill the pockets of already far too wealthy execs.

@lowqualityfacts the Fediverse is beneficial for ordinary people. That's what upsets big corporations.
@stefano @lowqualityfacts The big corporations don't care whether a technology is beneficial. They only care that it is profitable.

The main thing which they don't like about fedi is lack of exclusivity. This is why they built monopolistic silo systems and bait-and-switch adoption paths in the past. But if eyeballs are here then advertisers and the influence industry also have little choice. They have to go wherever people are.
@lowqualityfacts
Translation. Billionaires can't control it, therefore it's not profitable

@lowqualityfacts

This is actually a high-quality fact.

@Earthtoerika I'm ruined.
@lowqualityfacts Nah you're fine, you're on the fediverse so nothing is required to be low-quality just to keep profits up!

@lowqualityfacts @Earthtoerika

Don't worry. Let's call it a higher-quality low-quality-fact.

@lowqualityfacts @Earthtoerika I know a few streamers who could write you a great, groveling "I'm sorry" speach
@lowqualityfacts I don't understand why everything has to be "profitable" anyway. We've made everything - art, hobbies, healthcare, education, humanity in general - a commodity, and that's part of why the world sucks so bad lately. I hate that the world only values things that make money. *steps poutingly off of soapbox*

@izzyamar

As a fiber artist, it took me about a decade to recognize that i can simply say "no" to a commission. I don't have to justify it AND (my favorite bit) I can make things for the joy of making. I don't even need to finish them if i don't feel like it. The act of making is enough. Frogging 16 hours of work can feel similarly exhilarating.

@ms_o YES, THIS!!! Art can (and should) sometimes be completely for its own sake, or for the artists' enjoyment. I'm glad you were able to recognize it and set a boundary. <3

The idea of art having to be monetized nearly made me quit photography. I felt like my work was only valid if I was marketing and selling it, rather than just letting it be what it is - something I love.

Capitalism tries to suck the joy out of everything, dammit!

@izzyamar @lowqualityfacts Sadly, we all need to survive in this Lage-Stage Capitalist hellhole until the Glorious Revolution.

And if this means trying to make some money on the side, so be it.

@juergen_hubert @lowqualityfacts

If a person decides to turn their passion into a career, and it works for them, that's awesome! We should all be able to enjoy what we do. My issue is that, because we are in a Late-Stage Capitalist hellhole, we've somehow collectively gotten it into our heads that hobbies are a waste of time, and productivity and cash are the only true measures of success. No wonder everyone's so burnt out these days - if our hobbies now have to be side hustles, when can we ever just relax and enjoy ourselves?

If we can only see the value of doing something if it's bringing in money, and not recognize the intrinsic value of creation, leisure, and free time, then the Glorious Revolution can't come soon enough.

@izzyamar @lowqualityfacts as always: capitalism and rich people competing for high scores in wealth
@lowqualityfacts I find the word "profitable" difficult to understand... I am English, I can define it, it's just difficult to understand.
what I mean is "they" mean "financially profitable" but "profitable" can also be used like "environmentally profitable", " ethically/morally profitable", and so on... so, yeah, difficult to understand.

anyway, "the fediverse doesn't make billionaires richer" is basically what they mean, and my response that is "fuck off" 😁
@paul "works as designed" is a good answer as well. 😄
@lowqualityfacts
@lowqualityfacts Then how come I can’t sell my handmade skin peel serums made from my real skin on here?!
@lowqualityfacts When the social platform is good at facilitating social communication between humans and not advertising and propaganda 
@lowqualityfacts Profit is the least meaningful measure of success

@lowqualityfacts That's why multi-billion dollar corps better stay on dying corporate networks like twitter or develop a kind of social responsibility that fits real social media & could well lead to a beneficial coexistence of both.

#Mastodon #SocialMedia #Integrity #Freedom #Democracy #Responsibility

@lowqualityfacts Anyone who even says “The fediverse isn’t profitable” as an argument to anything doesn’t belong in the fediverse.
@lowqualityfacts It certainly isn't profitable for Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk.
@lowqualityfacts
Reminds me, I gotta get to work on some more creations & stick it to the corporate feudalists
@lowqualityfacts Maybe. I can’t trace a single sale of my book back here. But, then again, I can’t trace more than 3 back to Twitter. I suspect social media is only profitable for social media people.

@magitism @lowqualityfacts

This thread just popped up on my home feed, and I bought your book based solely on this post.

So now you can trace at least one sale to here.

@magitism @lowqualityfacts
I would argue it would depend on whether one files interaction with/in #HephalumpWorld itself in the "profit" category, or not.

I don't make doodley squat off it, cash-wise, but it enriches my life immensely, just by meeting people.

@lowqualityfacts That is way too high quality fact. Are you in danger? If yes, 😉 three times.

@lowqualityfacts How morally bankrupt is our culture when the question of "is something valuable" has been boiled down and reduced to "how much money is it worth?"

Oscar Wilde put it best: "A fool is someone who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing." Capitalism has created a culture of foolishness.

@lowqualityfacts i knew Twitter would never be the same once it went public, but now that it has gone private again, it’s even worse.

i always thought twitter needed to be a nonprofit in order to truly be what it claimed it wanted to be — once upon a time.

@lowqualityfacts And this is why I like it here!
@lowqualityfacts I thought this page was supposed to be for low quality facts
@lowqualityfacts I am here, and I like the fediverse - and I also agree with most of these replies. I do also want to point out something basic: servers and bandwidth and electricity and tech support - are not free. A lot of regular people are/were employed by those evil corporations you are complaining about. Try to remember that they’re all not the billionaire owners, they’re just regular people. Who pays for all the costs of the fediverse as it grows beyond hobby scale?
@lowqualityfacts late stage truth posting.
@lowqualityfacts
*The fediverse isn't a money-skimming operation

@lowqualityfacts

the fediverse isn't profitable.

Yes, and that is a very important feature

@moffintosh @lowqualityfacts Twitter wasn't profitable neither... most of the time...
@xChaos @lowqualityfacts Fedi is a bit different though. Perhaps it could be said that it can't be easily commodified: ie, it's hard to find a potential buisness model that could, even theoretically, extract profit from the fediverse (as a web of instances)

@moffintosh popular accounts with lot followers can still add advertising posts into their timeline, but they would really only on voluntary followers to see them. The instance operator may ask such accounts to pay some fee.

If fediverse users don't like the content vs. advertising ratio of such account, they would simply unfollow.

Popular accounts may even just simply link to their sponsors from their profile. In fact it is not that much different from how advertising worked on FM radio, or so. It just cannot easily target users based on knowing their personal preferences, like centralised social media (but as fediverse ecosystem evolves, this may not be true any longer ... except for accounts who really hide everything and just consume)

@lowqualityfacts

@lowqualityfacts maybe the profit motive doesn't have to be the overriding consideration in every aspect of our lives?

@lowqualityfacts obligatory “high quality fact” comment

# 8 out of ???

@lowqualityfacts Speaking of which, 2 #fediverse members are posting new music right now. Here's one we posted a couple of days ago. I posted another on Monday night. Being productive. Never make a dime. Not a big name. Don't have a marketing agency. Don't have a war with some other publisher. Don't get invited to talk shows. Never won a Grammy.

Maybe you'd like it.

#music #newmusic

https://soundcloud.com/stephen-teter/essence?si=1822faf891094cbd8ce30d9735e1414e&utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing

Essence

Lyrics by Aaron @[email protected] Music, performance, mix by Stephen D. Teter

SoundCloud
@lowqualityfacts I wish I could connect with more of these creative types. Don't seem to be many of them about.
@lowqualityfacts
This FAILS the Low Quality Fact Check.

@lowqualityfacts
Stated another way,

"The fediverse isn't profitable"

"Then your definition of 'profit' is defective and unhealthy."

@lowqualityfacts yeh i know. but where are the other tomatos o:
@lowqualityfacts look, we came here for *low* quality facts
@lowqualityfacts sadly is also not “profitable” for passionate artists. you really have to want it