Don't like strangers busting into your mentions to give unsolicited opinions?

This could be solved if the Fediverse had better comment controls.

You should be able to make a read-only post if you want.

And you should be able to make a public post that's only writeable to followers.

You should also be able to lock a thread if it becomes a vector for abuse.

"Just make locked posts" is the worst response to this because that so-called "solution" basically tells people to reduce their visibility.

Many people don't want their visibility to be reduced.

However, they want a reduction in harassment.

In fact, much of the "I don't want search to exist" crowd exists due to lack of comment control.

People don't want to be found on search because they can't control the potential replies that might occur through a search vector.

I know this because plenty of the anti-search crowd wants public visibility -- but they don't want harassment.

@atomicpoet I suppose the question on searching is whether it *needs* to exist. Are #Hashtags enough? I don't have the answers to this, and I wouldn't claim to, but it is one of the questions.

@lemonflavoured If a worthwhile goal is discoverability -- and it is -- then search needs to exist.

The bigger question is: why do *some* people not want search to exist?

And that's because search can be used for harassment.

However, with better comment controls, this becomes less of a problem since potential abusers could be thwarted from writing.

@lemonflavoured @atomicpoet Nope, #hashtags are not enough! Most people don't use them at all, or they don't use them properly, or some topics don't lend themselves to hashtagging. I find Mastodon's trending hashtags useless, they're always just #HashtagGames, maybe one news topic. #Search function allows users to find what interests them.
@erchanda @lemonflavoured @atomicpoet Not being able to search other people's posts is a design choice and i respect it. Prevents a lot of abuse. you may use guppe groups or forum systems like #lemmy for concentrated discourse.
@edendestroyer @lemonflavoured @atomicpoet I see what you mean, being able to search through millions of users' every word in every toot is very intrusive & would be impossible for a human to do without the tech. And the Cambridge Analytica horror story shows how that tech can be abused. Even in a "public" space, people can & should have some privacy. Sigh. I just would like better browsing/discovery tools to see what's going on in the world, find new things that might interest me, etc.
@erchanda @edendestroyer @atomicpoet The obvious answer is convince people to actually use hashtags better.
@lemonflavoured @edendestroyer @atomicpoet True! Or to consciously choose NOT to use #hashtags if they prefer to be less discoverable, but not just "forgot/couldn't be bothered" to use them. And #alttext for all images! And #contentwarnings when needed. Phew! It's a lot to learn, but sooooo worth it to make #Mastodon a safe, enjoyable, inclusive community! I'm loving the friendly nerdiness, that's my people!
@edendestroyer @lemonflavoured @atomicpoet But then YouTube's discovery algorithm is another horror story! I have no idea how privacy-respecting discovery tools could be designed, but Mastodon would be the one to do it! I'm so impressed by how thoughtful this community is! So OK, I take back my hashtags demanding the search ban be lifted. I'll wait for Masto to find a safer solution! 😊