Pure coincidence the industry migration from solutions-oriented to maximal-profit motives occurs in this same time frame.
Gates taught us two things: people don't want working software, they want software NOW, and where there's a want, there's extortion money to be made.
Add to that how the girls in John Nash's lab didn't behave according to his Game Theory market model, so their data was excluded from publication.
Are girls 'uninterested'? Or just smarter… 😅
@jpkmensah Any time a field gets lucrative, men push out women. Here's the famous 1983 MIT paper on that purge happening in computer science: https://simson.net/ref/1983/barriers.pdf
(See also @sarahtaber 's thread on "egg money" and https://mastodon.social/@Sheril/109545727584656667 for "beer brewer" becoming "witch".)
Some people see a tie in the shift to the advent of PCs in the home in the early 80s. Boys got computers to play with. Girls didn't. By the time young women enrolled in their first comp sci class in college, they were "behind." Even if they were brilliant at math or brilliant generally.
Prolly not the only thing, but probably one of the influences.
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/21/357629765/when-women-stopped-coding
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Strongly recommended: Mar Hicks @[email protected], Programmed Inequality: https://www.amazon.com/Programmed-Inequality-Discarded-Technologists-Computing/dp/0262535181 Mar gave a great talk on this at #ComputerHistoryMuseum a few years ago. It especially resonated with my (PhD mathematical programming) British wife.
@jpkmensah Same reasons there aren't more female bricklayers.
Emerging technologies reduce the burden of physical labor and costs can be cut by hiring women and children cheaper.
Once there is a demand for increased productivity then the low effort opportunities are found elsewhere.
Investors and child labor move onto the next big thing but only after some really hungry people built the framework.
Men get stuck doing inhuman labor faster for fear that regulators will shut them down.
@jpkmensah I wonder how much of it's down to personal computing's wholesale adoption by stock market traders, during the time markets were booming in the Reagan/Thatcher years, and home to all those toxic, coked-up douche-bros.
There's certainly a long lineage of grifters and get-rich-quick-schemers among men involved in IT since then.
And in the 90s I saw a lot of those kinds of attitudes from the teachers, and several students, when I chose Computer Studies at high school, with the intent of programming games, only to be repeatedly told that 'computers are for business'.
When they think that something is beneath them, they leave it to us. (Never noticing, or denying, just how much skill is required).
But once it becomes interesting to them, they get possessive! 🙄
@jpkmensah It's almost as if we had the explanation of the gender pay gap back to front all along...
"Software development is but one example of an occupation whose gender composition completely changed over the course of decades. Teaching also experienced a turnover in the gender of its staff, but the direction of the trend was reversed, with women replacing men as educators. And when they did, the salaries and status of the profession dropped sharply.". https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/09/what-programmings-past-reveals-about-todays-gender-pay-gap/498797/