I've gotten a lot of responses to that Substack piece about leaving Twitter. Many are positive but some are negative. A few are saying "oh so you think free speech is nasty?"

What kind of stupid question is that? Of course I do. The Nazis marching at Skokie were nasty. All sorts of speech is nasty. Supporting free speech doesn't mean reserving judgment about it, you imbecile. It means not using the state to suppress it.

@Popehat Also part of free speech is the ability to not speak in places where you don't wish to.
@DopeGhoti @Popehat And to not be a captive audience anywhere you don't wish to be.
@Popehat
I hate Illinois nazis
@jbminn @Popehat they are horrible in every place that isn't Illinois too.
blues brothers: I hate Illinois Nazi's

YouTube
@jbminn @Popehat as many times as I've seen that flic and missed the reference. Damn. I'm slippin'

@zeruch @jbminn @Popehat I was paid to see Cab Calloway sing Minnie the Moocher. ;)

(Extra.)

@jbminn @zeruch @Popehat
The correct response..esp in relation to Skokie!
@jbminn @Popehat The only correct thought when the Nazis at Skokie are brought up. 😂

@jbminn @Popehat

I saw that movie in one of the first showings in Chicago and the crowd burst into cheers at that line.

@jbminn @Popehat "Fix the cigarette lighter."
@Popehat I think the concept of "free speech" is one of the most misunderstood concepts in our society.
@jwslug @Popehat *deliberately* misunderstood
@jwslug @Popehat wait until anericans find out that at least many european countries believe it's not only about the state control of speach, but everyone depending on how.
@jwslug @Popehat and it's a very deliberately crafted misunderstanding. Like the misreading of the 2nd amendment.
@jwslug @Popehat Agreed. Most of the time when people like that blather on about "free speech" what they really mean is "consequence-free speech" IE the ability to say whatever nasty or stupid shit they want to say and then pretend they didn't say it, or get touchy when people react negatively to what they said.

@drwex @Popehat
Yep, or, to put it another way:

You can say what you want without getting arrested.

1) I don't have to listen to you.

2) I don't have to let you say it in my home or place of business

@drwex @jwslug @Popehat just to add--they also want you to be forced to listen to them. "I can say what I want, you HAVE to listen to me, and I shouldn't suffer any social or personal consequences for saying it."
@Popehat I've missed you since abandoning the other place. Glad to see you posting here.
@thevowel Yeah @Popehat is one of the last people I've been feeling the lack of. The main thing now I miss is the good material on Ukraine.

@hackbod @thevowel @Popehat

@uanews is a bot that reposts news (very useful for just getting a stream of information)

I'm still hopeful that Julia Davis (of Russian Media Monitor) will move to Mastodon.

@hackbod @thevowel recommend @CedricMas and @noelreports for daily Ukraine updates
Mastodon

A newer server operated by the Mastodon gGmbH non-profit

Mastodon hosted on mastodon.online

@hackbod @thevowel @Popehat

Try below even better Ukraine news updates than I had on twitter
@ukrdef

@Popehat The entertaining part of that is that some people are still gullible enough to believe that Musk cares a lick about free speech other than his own.
@sapphichazard @Popehat BINGO! You win the InterWebs for today.
@Popehat Welcome, I’m really glad you are here. I enjoy your podcast with Josh, very insightful.
@Popehat Thank you for writing that - you articulated better than I could the difference between “I’m going to stop posting but check in once in a while and monitor the site” and “It was fun, but I reject what that site is now and don’t want to be associated with it”.
It’s impressive, and maybe a little scary, that the site became so prevalent that some people are unwilling to delete their old posts there. I don’t remember this phenomenon on earlier community sites when they fell out of favor.
@Popehat @christianholt The continued allegiance to the Catholic Church by people who profess to care about children (esp sexual abuse) is somewhat analogous.
@christianholt @Popehat I'm thinking of Digg and Slashdot... where else? Maybe in the other cases people didn't have as much of a professional identity wrapped up in the site?
@russellpierce @Popehat I feel like earlier sites were more compartmentalized - twitter really sort of broke the wall of engaging with the public and blurred the line between online persona and real life in the same way AOL brought email and chat rooms to the masses.
For me: IRC, Usenet, Listservs, Slashdot, Plastic, Metafilter, Digg, some vBulletin sites, Reddit, to name a few. Slashdot and Plastic were based on karma/reputation and used moderation/metamoderation too.

@Popehat The people using the 'you must hate free speech' nonsense are part of the problem. No one leaving Twitter hates free speech, we hate the lack of content moderation and the sheer viciousness of right wing trolls that have been emboldened.

Musk himself said that freedom of speech is different from freedom of reach, but so far that seems to have merely been a mealy-mouthed excuse in the face of fleeing advertisers which was entirely an empty platitude.

@r00tdenied @Popehat exactly that. Twitter has become a binfire of bots and trolls who are stirring up hatred.
@lassielmr @Popehat and its going to be even worse now that the trust & safety council is disbanded.
@r00tdenied @Popehat Twitter seemingly giving right wing journalists essentially free reign to the back end of twitter was the last straw for me.
@Popehat I'm just glad to see you here! I deleted my Twitter account before the sale closed and I'm happy I can follow you again.
@Popehat glad you’re here, Ken. Your perspective and analysis have been incredibly valuable to me.
@Popehat When I was at Cato, if I publicly criticized reactionary right wing preference or social behavior, I'd frequently hear from internet libertarians that, "As a libertarian, you should only discuss what the state should or shouldn't do, and not take moral positions on issues unrelated to state action," and it was tremendously stupid. But there are weirdos who think that way—usually because they don't want such criticisms directed at their own reactionary preferences.
@arossp @Popehat The lack of a moral stance (and thus acceptance of anyone’s moral code) is precisely why libertarians fail again and again
@Popehat It's good to have you back.

@Popehat

"The right to free speech means the govt can't arrest you for what you say.

It doesn't mean that anyone else has to listen to your bullshit,

or host you while you share it.

The 1st Amendment doesn't shield you from criticism or consequences."

#FreeSpeech from #xkcd

#FirstAmendment #Comic

@ZhiZhu @Popehat
I cannot recommend Xkcd enough.

PS — the name is not an acronym. It's the most unpronounceable word the cartoonist could think of.

@ZhiZhu @Popehat indeed, those who confuse freedom of speech with freedom from consequences seem to overlook the fact that one of the core arguments for freedom of speech is to create opportunities to scrutinize and *reject* bad ideas.

You foster discussion and debate in order to determine which ideas should be promoted and developed and which ideas ought to be consigned to history's dustbin. There's not much point to free speech otherwise.

@ZhiZhu @Popehat if free speech is about the proverbial "marketplace of ideas," one of the things that happens in a marketplace is that consumers are free to decline to purchase--or even to boycott--products deemed inferior or offensive.

Some people seem to feel entitled to have their ideas consumed regardless of quality or demand.

@ZhiZhu Also doesn't mean you can't protest against hate speech, etc.
@Popehat have you ever come across any reason - other than stupidity or bad faith - for people being 'confused' between freedom of speech (from government interference) and.. I guess freedom from consequences (from literally everyone/everywhere else)?
@interpipes @Popehat I'd say money. Definitely way too much money. Elon, remember, was born rich.

@interpipes @Popehat white supremacy.

That's the only reason I've come across.

@Popehat Glad to see you use Mastondon, Mr. Hat.
@Popehat ken fix0rd teh server! And... Fascists/racists who are obsessed with overturning elections can run their mouth, and they can buy twitter too, but they can all rot in hell together. I don't want the slightest benefit to come to them. People who are not nazis need to get off tw now.