Business

The latest news and headlines, featuring real time updates for countries, cities, states, politics, economy, sports, food, culture via Ken's Blogspot

Latest #news (🤡 #clownnews included this time)

📢 Israel deepens illegal #gaza control through 'yellow line' expansion: #WSJ

📢 Iran's Quds Force Cmd. Qaani: #lebanon, #palestine resistance will liberate #alQuds

📢 18 countries condemn #somaliland ‘embassy’ in #jerusalem

🤡 Lebanon's Aoun reaffirms full Israeli withdrawal demand, defends direct talks

🤡 Pakistan signals possible new #US #Iran talks in #islamabad

🤡 Rubio says Iran deal 'still work in progress' amid Trump push #washington

▶️🇺🇸 La #Policía pide a la población que se mantenga alejada de las calles cercanas a la #CasaBlanca tras el tiroteo.

Anteriormente, el canal #CBS reportó que el sospechoso que abrió fuego cerca de la Casa Blanca este 23 de mayo se encuentra en estado crítico y fue hospitalizado. A su vez, otra persona, presumiblemente un transeúnte, también resultó herido en el tiroteo y se encuentra en estado grave. Los Agentes del Servicio Secreto de #EEUU respondieron al fuego y neutralizaron al hombre.

Poco después, el diario The Wall Street Journal #WSJ informó el atacante falleció en el hospital a causa de sus heridas.

https://t.me/ophiucu/103261

World Capitals

The latest news and headlines, featuring real time updates for countries, cities, states, politics, economy, sports, food, culture via Ken's Blogspot

#GOP lawmakers' inability 2 pass Trump's #HomelandSecurity funding bill, while also turning up heat against his "#AntiWeaponizationFund" 2 pay out $1.8B to his political allies, →beginning 2 make cracks show, board wrote. #Trump's other fixation on getting #WhiteHouse #ballroom funding passed has similarly ground #DHS budget bill process 2 a halt, & ongoing #WarPowers votes #Democrats r forcing against his action in Iran r also starting 2 divide party

#WSJ #Republicans

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-wsj-2676933901/

WSJ warns Republicans are whispering something about Trump they won't say publicly

President Donald Trump is dragging the Republican Party down at a moment when it could cost them everything, the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board wrote in an analysis published on Friday evening."Republicans don’t want to say this publicly, but privately they do," wrote the b...

Raw Story

Cozy 3 Bdr 2000sq ft house surrounded by #vineyards built by author Jack London in the early 1900s available in #Sonoma 's #ValleyOfTheMoon if you have spare $2.3 million

https://www.wsj.com/real-estate/luxury-homes/jack-london-sonoma-california-431c5f71?st=yJjyvC&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink #GiftLink #JackLondon #RealEstate #WSJ #AerialView

Wall Street Journal Criticizes Trump's $1.8 Billion Fund Deal Amid Legal and Ethical Concerns

📰 Original title: WSJ torches Trump's 'rotten' deal as 'emblem of today's warped political age'

🤖 IA: It's clickbait ⚠️
👥 Users: It's clickbait ⚠️

View full AI summary: https://en.killbait.com/wall-street-journal-criticizes-trump-s-1-8-billion-fund-deal-amid-legal-and-ethical-concerns.html?utm_source=mastodon_world&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=killbait.mastodon_world

#politics #trump #wsj #fund

Wall Street Journal Criticizes Trump's $1.8 Billion Fund Deal Amid Legal and Ethical Concerns

The Wall Street Journal's editorial board sharply criticized former President Donald Trump's recent $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund deal, calling it a 'rotten' agreement that reflects the current distorted political climate. The fund was created as part of a settlement following a lawsuit against the IRS, and it includes additional protections for Trump himself. While the Trump family is ineligible to receive payouts, the WSJ highlighted that some January 6, 2021, rioters might be able to benefit from the fund. The editorial suggested that these participants could claim they were wrongly accused or that police actions were responsible for injuries during the Capitol riots. Federal Judge Kathleen Williams, who oversaw the lawsuit, expressed uncertainty over whether she had jurisdiction since Trump was president and had oversight of the IRS. A hearing is scheduled for May 27 to clarify this jurisdictional question. Meanwhile, reports indicate that the Justice Department does not believe judicial approval is necessary for the fund. The WSJ editorial emphasized concerns that the arrangement could disproportionately benefit Trump’s allies, raising ethical and political questions about accountability and fairness in high-profile legal settlements.

KillBait

Wall Street Journal Criticizes Trump's $1.8 Billion Fund Deal Amid Legal and Ethical Concerns

📰 Original title: WSJ torches Trump's 'rotten' deal as 'emblem of today's warped political age'

🤖 IA: It's clickbait ⚠️
👥 Users: It's clickbait ⚠️

View full AI summary: https://en.killbait.com/wall-street-journal-criticizes-trump-s-1-8-billion-fund-deal-amid-legal-and-ethical-concerns.html?utm_source=mastodon_social&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=killbait.mastodon_social

#politics #trump #wsj ...

Wall Street Journal Criticizes Trump's $1.8 Billion Fund Deal Amid Legal and Ethical Concerns

The Wall Street Journal's editorial board sharply criticized former President Donald Trump's recent $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund deal, calling it a 'rotten' agreement that reflects the current distorted political climate. The fund was created as part of a settlement following a lawsuit against the IRS, and it includes additional protections for Trump himself. While the Trump family is ineligible to receive payouts, the WSJ highlighted that some January 6, 2021, rioters might be able to benefit from the fund. The editorial suggested that these participants could claim they were wrongly accused or that police actions were responsible for injuries during the Capitol riots. Federal Judge Kathleen Williams, who oversaw the lawsuit, expressed uncertainty over whether she had jurisdiction since Trump was president and had oversight of the IRS. A hearing is scheduled for May 27 to clarify this jurisdictional question. Meanwhile, reports indicate that the Justice Department does not believe judicial approval is necessary for the fund. The WSJ editorial emphasized concerns that the arrangement could disproportionately benefit Trump’s allies, raising ethical and political questions about accountability and fairness in high-profile legal settlements.

KillBait
Continent News

The latest news and headlines, featuring real time updates for countries, cities, states, politics, economy, sports, food, culture via Ken's Blogspot

Bari Weiss: Everything You Didn't Know About Her Sh*tty Past

YouTube