@tinoeberl
#Wilhoit|s Konservative.
Agrarunternehmer *) gehören eben zu einer der In-Groups, die das Recht schützt, aber nicht bindet.
*) Kann man eigentlich schon wieder von #Bojar|en sprechen?
@daarin
Ruhs ist rechts, Hayali integer.
Das ist der Unterschied.
Vielleicht ist es aber auch einfach nur so, dass #Ruhs - als Produkt der #KonradAdenauerStiftung - einfach nur zur "konservativen" In-Group gehört.
(in Anlehnung an #Wilhoit Konservative)
Wilhoit's Law:
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:
There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
#Wilhoit #WilhoitsLaw
https://crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/liberals-against-progressives/#comment-729288
#Conservatism, as a #political_philosophy (to the extraordinarily limited extent one can dignify it with that description) is comprehensively explained by #Wilhoit's Law (i.e., a throw-away comment to a blog post, which is as much explanation as conservatism needs or merits) -- see links in comments below.
But it's @rickperlstein's 2012 article in The Baffler that explains conservatism as a business model.
https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2023/08/the-apotheosis-of-the-long-con
Remember Truth Social, the alternative to Twitter before Twitter became the alternative to Twitter? Between posts about conspiracy theories and right-wing grievances was an unusual advertisement: a photo of former President Donald J. Trump holding a $1,000 bill made of gold, which he was apparently offering free to supporters. But there were a few catches: […]
M Schommer
Falow, Master Surchid
Some Bits: Nelson's Linkblog
Marcus Marcius Marcellus