Anarchism is a part of ##FOSS governance, a political philosophy and social movement that shaped the foundations of the internet and ##openweb to move from centralized power to decentralized, self-governing paths. This was a strong part of ##web01 and a strong part of why it worked so well. ##Anarchists believe that society and technology can be organized to build freedom, equality, and cooperation

What is Anarchism?

There are forms of anarchism, some well-known:

• Anarcho-Communism: Advocates for the abolition of private property and the establishment of a classless, stateless society based on communal ownership and cooperation.
• Anarcho-Syndicalism: Seeks to abolish the wage system and replace it with a system of workers’ self-management and direct democracy.
• Individualist Anarchism: Emphasizes the importance of individual freedom and autonomy, and is associated with the writings of figures like Emma Goldman and Max Stirner.

A long and varied history, with roots in liberalism and socialism.

Anarchism in Action

History of Anarchism

Some old dead figures and movements include:

• The French Revolution: Inspired many early anarchists with ideas of liberty, equality, and fraternity.
• Pierre-Joseph Proudhon: The first self-proclaimed anarchist, wrote the influential work What is Property? in 1840.
• Mikhail Bakunin: A Russian revolutionary, was a key figure in the anarchist movement of the late 19th century.
• Emma Goldman: An American feminist, anarchist, was a prominent in the early 20th century.

Arguments for Anarchism

Supporters of anarchism emphasize:

Arguments Against Anarchism

Critics of anarchism raise concerns:

Anarchism is at the heart of meany of our ##openweb norms, its advantages and disadvantages depend strongly on assumptions and material conditions in the time and place where people try and enact it. The ##openweb and ##Fediverse with its strong flow of “trust” and “abundances” is a fertile place for “nativist” experiments. Though, as critics, argue this path is not easy or without its problems.

The ##OMN is mediated “native” https://opencollective.com/open-media-network join us if you would like to try walking this path.

Anarchism challenges forms of authority and domination. The idea, rooted in classical liberalism and Enlightenment principles, is any exercise of authority or power must justify its legitimacy. This burden of proof applies universally, whether within a family, a state, or global institutions. If authority cannot demonstrate its legitimacy, it should be dismantled.

The concept of legitimate authority is central to anarchism. Those in power must justify their actions and their right to hold power. If they cannot, their authority is considered illegitimate.

In democratic systems, legitimacy is supposed to be maintained through public debate, interaction, and struggle. If these mechanisms fail, the legitimacy is in question. In totalitarian or authoritarian systems, legitimacy is non-existent because these systems do not allow challenges to authority. People in positions of authority internalize the belief that their power is legitimate. This internalization makes it difficult for them to recognize or acknowledge the need to justify authority.

Throughout history, systems of authority and domination have been accepted as legitimate by those who are subordinated. This acceptance is due to a combination of indoctrination, socialization, and the internalization of prevailing values.

• Slavery: Many slave societies were stable because slaves accepted their subordination as legitimate.
• Feudalism: In feudal societies, people accepted their roles within the hierarchy as natural and proper.
• Modern Employment: Today, many people accept the necessity of renting their labour to survive, a concept that was once seen as wage slavery.

People challenging the legitimacy of authority leads to social struggles, revolutions, and sometimes significant change. Anarchists take this challenge seriously and push questioning the illegitimacy of authority through active resistance and the promotion of ##DIY self-governing structures. This path and philosophy has profound implications for how we build and work in technology and shapes our current ##openweb reboot.

Please keep this path ##KISS

More on this https://hamishcampbell.com/understanding-anarchism/

https://hamishcampbell.com/the-fediverse-is-native-to-anarchism/

#Anarchists #diy #fediverse #FOSS #KISS #OMN #openweb #Web01

A breakdown of the ##OMN hashtags and how they are typically used as a social change and challenge project that we need:

And on the positive side:

Each of these hashtags serves as a shorthand for broader discussions and concepts, allowing people to participate in and contribute to conversations around these topics on the ##openweb and inside the ##dotcons it’s about linking.

##KISS

https://hamishcampbell.com/reminder-about-the-hashtag-family/

#climatechaos #deathcult #dotcons #fashernista #KISS #mainstreaming #neoliberalism #NGO #OMN #openweb #stupidindividualism #Web01

In the ever-evolving realm of the internet, discussions about the various versions of the web have become increasingly prevalent. Terms like #Web01, #Web02, and so forth are not just technical jargon; they reflect the evolving nature of the digital landscape. However, as these hashtags proliferate, they can also contribute to confusion and spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt (#FUD).

To address this confusion, hashtags like #openweb and #closedweb offer clarity in distinguishing platforms based on their principles. The #openweb embodies concepts of openness, transparency, and community control, while the #closedweb prioritizes encryption technology, control, and lacks transparency. By using these hashtags, we can better understand the ideological and technical underpinnings of web platforms.

Initiatives such as #indymediaback and #OMN exemplify grassroots efforts to promote decentralized, community-controlled media and communication. These projects challenge the dominance of large corporations and advocate for a more inclusive, diverse, and community-controlled approach to technology.

Central to this discussion is the concept of the #geekproblem, where technically people prioritize solutions without considering broader societal implications or the needs of ordinary people.

The solution lies in developing social tech that transcends the #geekproblem and focuses on the needs and perspectives of the community. This involves involving diverse groups of people in the development process and promoting open-source code, open standards, open governance, and open data.

However, achieving this vision requires overcoming challenges such as resistance to change and the avoiding the dominance of large corporations. By actively using principles like open participation, decentralization, transparency, and interoperability (#4opens), we can challenge the prevailing narrative.

Moreover, it's crucial to recognize that the struggle for a more equitable and sustainable future is inherently political. The dominance of large corporations and the perpetuation of neoliberal ideologies pose significant barriers to progress. Therefore, mobilizing collective action and advocating for policies that prioritize community well-being over profit-driven interests are essential.

The last 40 years of technological development, coupled with the urgency of addressing climate change, highlight the need to fundamentally change our approach to technology. The environmental impact, social inequality, corporate control, and surveillance associated with current technologies underscore the necessity for change.

Building a future where technology serves the interests of many requires prioritizing sustainability, equity, collaboration, and activism. By challenging entrenched power dynamics, confronting corporate interests, and mobilizing collective action, we can create a resilient and inclusive #openweb future that serves the needs of people and the planet.

We can work towards a future

The discussion surrounding the classification of different versions of the web, such as ##Web01, ##Web02, ##Web03, ##Web04, or ##Web05, is not merely an academic exercise but an aspect of understanding the evolving nature of the digital landscape. However, the proliferation of these hashtags can lead to confusion and contribute to the spread of fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) among users.

In response to this confusion, the hashtags ##openweb and ##closedweb offer a clear and concise way to delineate between platforms that embrace openness, transparency, and community control (#openweb) and those that prioritize proprietary technology, centralized control, and lack transparency (#closedweb). By using these hashtags, we can foster a better understanding of the ideological and technical underpinnings of different web platforms.

Projects like ##indymediaback and ##OMN exemplify grassroots efforts to promote decentralized, community-controlled media and communication platforms. These initiatives are vital in challenging the dominance of large corporations in shaping the digital landscape and in advocating for a more inclusive, diverse, and community-controlled approach to technology development.

At the heart of this discussion lies the ##geekproblem, which refers to the tendency among technologically inclined people to prioritize technical solutions without considering their broader societal implications or the needs of ordinary people. By recognizing the ##geekproblem, we can begin to address the inherent biases and limitations of tech-centric approaches to problem-solving and advocate for solutions that are more inclusive and community-driven.

The solution to this problem lies in developing social tech that transcends the ##geekproblem and focuses on the needs and perspectives of the community. This entails involving a diverse group of people in the development and decision-making process and promoting open-source code, open standards, open governance, and open data in technology development. By embracing these principles, we can create a more equitable, transparent, and collaborative #4opens digital ecosystem.

However, achieving this vision requires overcoming challenges, including the resistance of the status quo and the fear of change. By actively using the #4opens—open participation, decentralization, transparency, and interoperability—we can challenge the prevailing narrative, call out pointless technologies, and compost the ##techshit that contributes to the perpetuation of harmful social dynamics.

Moreover, it is essential to recognize that the struggle for a more equitable and sustainable future is inherently political. The dominance of large corporations and the perpetuation of ##neoliberal ideologies pose significant barriers to progress. Therefore, it is imperative to mobilize collective action and advocate for policies and initiatives that prioritize the needs and well-being of communities over profit-driven interests.

In conclusion, the use of hashtags such as ##openweb, ##closedweb, and #4opens serves as a powerful tool for organizing and mobilizing grassroots efforts to challenge the status quo. By embracing these hashtags and the values they represent, we can work towards a future where technology serves the interests of the many rather than the few.

#4opens #closedweb #geekproblem #indymediaback #neoliberal #OMN #openweb #techshit #Web01 #Web02 #web03 #Web04 #Web05

https://hamishcampbell.com/?p=3314

#Web01, #Web02, and #Web03 are terms that are used to refer to different generations or phases of the World Wide Web (WWW). The World Wide Web is a system of interlinked hypertext documents that is accessed through the Internet.

Web01 refers to the early days of the World Wide Web, when it was first introduced in the late 1980s and early 1990s. During this time, the web was primarily used for academic scientific, NGO's hobbyists and activists purposes and less yet widely adopted by the public.

"Common" sense says
Web 1.0: the web is for sharing information!
Web 2.0: but what if we could make money too?
Web 3.0: the web is only for making money.

The is a problem with this #web03 is not even on the web, it's apps based and #web02 was the time when this move happened so the only true part of this "common" sense is the #web01 part... good to think on this for building out the #openweb