In the ever-evolving realm of the internet, discussions about the various versions of the web have become increasingly prevalent. Terms like #Web01, #Web02, and so forth are not just technical jargon; they reflect the evolving nature of the digital landscape. However, as these hashtags proliferate, they can also contribute to confusion and spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt (#FUD).

To address this confusion, hashtags like #openweb and #closedweb offer clarity in distinguishing platforms based on their principles. The #openweb embodies concepts of openness, transparency, and community control, while the #closedweb prioritizes encryption technology, control, and lacks transparency. By using these hashtags, we can better understand the ideological and technical underpinnings of web platforms.

Initiatives such as #indymediaback and #OMN exemplify grassroots efforts to promote decentralized, community-controlled media and communication. These projects challenge the dominance of large corporations and advocate for a more inclusive, diverse, and community-controlled approach to technology.

Central to this discussion is the concept of the #geekproblem, where technically people prioritize solutions without considering broader societal implications or the needs of ordinary people.

The solution lies in developing social tech that transcends the #geekproblem and focuses on the needs and perspectives of the community. This involves involving diverse groups of people in the development process and promoting open-source code, open standards, open governance, and open data.

However, achieving this vision requires overcoming challenges such as resistance to change and the avoiding the dominance of large corporations. By actively using principles like open participation, decentralization, transparency, and interoperability (#4opens), we can challenge the prevailing narrative.

Moreover, it's crucial to recognize that the struggle for a more equitable and sustainable future is inherently political. The dominance of large corporations and the perpetuation of neoliberal ideologies pose significant barriers to progress. Therefore, mobilizing collective action and advocating for policies that prioritize community well-being over profit-driven interests are essential.

The last 40 years of technological development, coupled with the urgency of addressing climate change, highlight the need to fundamentally change our approach to technology. The environmental impact, social inequality, corporate control, and surveillance associated with current technologies underscore the necessity for change.

Building a future where technology serves the interests of many requires prioritizing sustainability, equity, collaboration, and activism. By challenging entrenched power dynamics, confronting corporate interests, and mobilizing collective action, we can create a resilient and inclusive #openweb future that serves the needs of people and the planet.

We can work towards a future

The discussion surrounding the classification of different versions of the web, such as ##Web01, ##Web02, ##Web03, ##Web04, or ##Web05, is not merely an academic exercise but an aspect of understanding the evolving nature of the digital landscape. However, the proliferation of these hashtags can lead to confusion and contribute to the spread of fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) among users.

In response to this confusion, the hashtags ##openweb and ##closedweb offer a clear and concise way to delineate between platforms that embrace openness, transparency, and community control (#openweb) and those that prioritize proprietary technology, centralized control, and lack transparency (#closedweb). By using these hashtags, we can foster a better understanding of the ideological and technical underpinnings of different web platforms.

Projects like ##indymediaback and ##OMN exemplify grassroots efforts to promote decentralized, community-controlled media and communication platforms. These initiatives are vital in challenging the dominance of large corporations in shaping the digital landscape and in advocating for a more inclusive, diverse, and community-controlled approach to technology development.

At the heart of this discussion lies the ##geekproblem, which refers to the tendency among technologically inclined people to prioritize technical solutions without considering their broader societal implications or the needs of ordinary people. By recognizing the ##geekproblem, we can begin to address the inherent biases and limitations of tech-centric approaches to problem-solving and advocate for solutions that are more inclusive and community-driven.

The solution to this problem lies in developing social tech that transcends the ##geekproblem and focuses on the needs and perspectives of the community. This entails involving a diverse group of people in the development and decision-making process and promoting open-source code, open standards, open governance, and open data in technology development. By embracing these principles, we can create a more equitable, transparent, and collaborative #4opens digital ecosystem.

However, achieving this vision requires overcoming challenges, including the resistance of the status quo and the fear of change. By actively using the #4opens—open participation, decentralization, transparency, and interoperability—we can challenge the prevailing narrative, call out pointless technologies, and compost the ##techshit that contributes to the perpetuation of harmful social dynamics.

Moreover, it is essential to recognize that the struggle for a more equitable and sustainable future is inherently political. The dominance of large corporations and the perpetuation of ##neoliberal ideologies pose significant barriers to progress. Therefore, it is imperative to mobilize collective action and advocate for policies and initiatives that prioritize the needs and well-being of communities over profit-driven interests.

In conclusion, the use of hashtags such as ##openweb, ##closedweb, and #4opens serves as a powerful tool for organizing and mobilizing grassroots efforts to challenge the status quo. By embracing these hashtags and the values they represent, we can work towards a future where technology serves the interests of the many rather than the few.

#4opens #closedweb #geekproblem #indymediaback #neoliberal #OMN #openweb #techshit #Web01 #Web02 #web03 #Web04 #Web05

https://hamishcampbell.com/?p=3314

#Web01, #Web02, and #Web03 are terms that are used to refer to different generations or phases of the World Wide Web (WWW). The World Wide Web is a system of interlinked hypertext documents that is accessed through the Internet.

Web01 refers to the early days of the World Wide Web, when it was first introduced in the late 1980s and early 1990s. During this time, the web was primarily used for academic scientific, NGO's hobbyists and activists purposes and less yet widely adopted by the public.

What duse a progressive #openweb look like?

Firstly not what #web02 became and what #web03 is pushing now this is obvious.

The web was born "libertarian socialist" and endured years of pushing #mainstreaming into #capitalist supplication.

The #openweb it self stands agenst this pushing. Yes, the #dotcons have taken social space but we still have our spaces #fedivers

Am concentrating on "our" space were meany concentrate on pushing the #dotcons back, both are usefull.

"Common" sense says
Web 1.0: the web is for sharing information!
Web 2.0: but what if we could make money too?
Web 3.0: the web is only for making money.

The is a problem with this #web03 is not even on the web, it's apps based and #web02 was the time when this move happened so the only true part of this "common" sense is the #web01 part... good to think on this for building out the #openweb