PREreview11h ago

Back in 2023, PREreview partnered with the journal Current Research in Neurobiology to explore integrating our Live Reviews model into their workflow, to inform editorial decision-making.

This experience, led by Dr. Chris Petkov, showed that community Live Reviews can match the quality and time-efficiency of traditional #PeerReview while opening opportunities for dialogue and learning often missing from the process.

📑 The results of the pilot, run with five manuscripts submitted to CRNEUR in that year, are now published in Research Integrity and Peer Review. Read the open access paper here: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-026-00210-5

#ScholarlyPublishing #LiveReview

Dr. G. Power2d ago

Citation Relevance Auditor v2 now:

- Flags when cited papers contradict the claim (not just relevant/irrelevant)
- Sharper peer-review criteria (working paper vs journal, audience fit)
- Copyright-safe — evidence database is gitignored by default
- Cleaner YAML schema for claim extraction

6-agent pipeline: outline → literature → draft → verify → review.

MIT license.

#AcademicWriting #OpenSource #ResearchTools #PeerReview #LLM #CitationAnalysis #ScholarlyComms

https://github.com/gpowerf/citation-relevance-auditor

GitHub - gpowerf/citation-relevance-auditor: “You cited it, but does it fit?” — A prompt that systematically checks if in-text citations match their references in meaning and strength. Drop in a paper, specify the reference numbers, and get a clear, per-reference relevance verdict (Highly relevant, Somewhat relevant, or Not relevant) with reasoning.

“You cited it, but does it fit?” — A prompt that systematically checks if in-text citations match their references in meaning and strength. Drop in a paper, specify the reference numbers, and get a...

GitHub
SORTEE2d ago

Ever think the #PeerReview system is broken? ‘Peer review by Reciprocity’ proposes to make this process fairer and more sustainable.

Learn all about it through Oakleigh Wilson’s incredible conversation with Angela Moles for the ninth instalment of the #ECRAsks series: https://sortee.org/blog/2026/06/23/2026_ecr_asks_angela_moles/

EGU2d ago

👀 Does peer review still seem challenging and full of overwhelming doubts? Are you looking to gain experience in the peer review of scientific manuscripts?

🙌 Good news! #EGU is once again offering its members FREE #PeerReview training, consisting of three online sessions on 8, 15, and 29 September.

📆 Application deadline: 28 July 2026.

Apply Now and make full use of many participation benefits!

👉 Learn more here: https://egu.eu/9YP0K8
📸 Eleonora Dallan on https://imaggeo.egu.eu

Markus Osterhoff4d ago

#GutenMorgen, Ihr fedi-Wesen!

Gestern „kurz“ im Labor gestrandet mit 1 … unklarem Problem, am Ende hat es dann warumAuchImmer funktioniert. Aber die Doktorandys können sich das ja mal genauer anku … also sie können jetzt weitermachen, als sei nichts gewesen ;)

Heute hamwa den #OpenScience Meet-up: #PeerReview in the age of genAI im Institut.
Ich fürchte, unser Seminarräumchen wird 🥵 …

Habt 1 gelüfteten Tag!

ReproducibiliTea4d ago

Did you know that ReproducibiliTea journal clubs can contribute to post-publication reviews?

With support from the steering committee, participating journal clubs have access to suggested review targets, peer review guidance, publication venues for commentaries, and funding opportunities.

Interested in getting involved?

Email [email protected] to receive resources and learn more.

See our blog post for more information about the project.

https://reproducibilitea.org/jc/2025/11/07/post-publication-reviewing

#ReproducubiliTea #OpenScience #Reproducibility #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity

Post-publication reviewing by ReproducibiliTea journal clubs

Our ReproducibiliTea community consists of journal clubs organised and joined mainly by early career researchers who discuss journal articles on a regular basis, sometimes even resembling the act of post-publication reviewing. The content of these discussions is, however, typically kept private. We think that this is a missed opportunity to share ideas with the wider community, learn from each other, and contribute to the scholarly discourse. At the same time, we believe that ReproducibiliTea journal clubs that focus mainly on topics related to improving research practices, could also incorporate peer review training into their programmes.

ReproducibiliTea
slowforward4d ago

“cosmopolitismo femminile plurale”, a cura di giulia tellini, diego salvadori, salomé vuelta garcìa

Affrontare il tema del cosmopolitismo al femminile significa parlare di donne che per i motivi più vari hanno vissuto in più luoghi, che hanno scelto come loro patria d’elezione il mondo intero, che hanno sviluppato uno sguardo multi-prospettico e trans-nazionale su una pluralità di questioni. Si tratta di poetesse, drammaturghe, pubbliciste, pedagogiste, dottoresse, scienziate, saggiste, filosofe, che, fra l’Otto e il Novecento, sono riuscite non solo a integrarsi in un paese diverso rispetto a quello d’origine (sia in quanto donne, sia in quanto straniere), ma anche a studiare, a lavorare, a combattere contro le dittature e gli integralismi, a far ascoltare forte e chiara la propria voce di libertà e di rivolta.

#AdaMilani #AmeliaPincherleRosselli #AngelicaPalli #AriannaFiore #ÁgnesHeller #CamillaBencini #cosmopolitismo #CosmopolitismoFemminilePlurale #criticaLetteraria #DiegoSalvadori #divorzio #donne #donneScrittrici #dottoresse #drammaturghe #dualismi #ElenaRaffalovichComparetti #emancipazione #filosofe #filosofia #FiorenzaToccafondi #Firenze #GeneraciónDel27 #GiovannaAmato #GiuliaTellini #IdolinaLandolfi #letteratura #LucíaSánchezSaornilb #MarcoCiardi #MariaJuditeDeCarvalho #MichelaGraziani #NinaOlivettiModona #Novecento #OleksandraRekutLiberatore #Ottocento #ParigiFinDeSiècle #pedagogia #pedagogiste #peerReview #poesia #poete #poetesse #pubbliciste #riviste #RomanceroDeMujeresLibres #saggiste #SaloméVueltaGarcía #SchizziParigini #scienza #scienziate #scrittrici #SEF #SefEditrice #SocietàEditriceFiorentina #societàPortoghese #StudiERicercheDelDipartimentoDiLettereEFilosofia #teatro #ucroniaEmancipazionista #UniversitàDiFirenze
Cosmopolitismo femminile plurale

Affrontare il tema del cosmopolitismo al femminile significa parlare di donne che per i motivi più vari hanno vissuto in più luoghi, che hanno scelto come loro patria d’elezione il mondo intero, che hanno sviluppato uno sguardo multi-prospettico e trans-nazionale su una pluralità di questioni. Si tratta di poetesse, drammaturghe, pubbliciste, pedagogiste, dottoresse, scienziate, saggiste, filosofe, che, fra l’Otto e il Novecento, sono riuscite non solo a integrarsi in un paese diverso rispetto a quello d’origine (sia in quanto donne, sia in quanto straniere), ma anche a studiare, a lavorare, a combattere contro le dittature e gli integralismi, a far ascoltare forte e chiara la propria voce di libertà e di rivolta.

Moreno Colaiacovo 🇮🇹6d ago

🧪 "La valutazione della #ricerca è in crisi. Le intelligenze artificiali potrebbero essere la soluzione. Per una ricerca scientifica più rapida, libera e aperta."

Un interessante punto di vista di M. Sandal

#PeerReview #AI

La valutazione artificiale della ricerca
https://www.indiscreto.org/la-valutazione-artificiale-della-ricerca/

ASK A PUNK TORONTO6d ago

Atom Age #3 - HexOffender / Pests / Dessicate / Slacker / Peer Review

Doors Pub, Saturday, August 15 at 08:00 PM EDT

C’mon out to party to honour our bro Atom Would.

Featuring:

HexOffender - scary music for scary people

Pests - also scary music for scary people

Desiccate - loud music for loud people

Slacker - fast music for fast people

Peer Review - garagey music for garagey people

Special guest DJs downstairs!

Y’all know how to use Google, you can find everyone’s Bandcamps on your own.

Saturday, August 15th

8PM doors
9PM music

$15/PWYC
NOTAFLOF

https://toronto.askapunk.net/event/atom-age-3-hexoffender-pests-dessicate-slacker-peer-review

Show threadTuomo ValkonenJun 18
Research should be treated more like open source software: continuously improved, corrected, extended, and scrutinized. But both #peerreview ers and #opensource developers could benefit from less gatekeeping and more constructive engagement with users and contributors.