Tuomo Valkonen
More junk research *not* caught by entirely dysfunctional peer review. Bureaucratic #PeerReview is a scam. https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/influential-study-touting-chatgpt-in-education-retracted-over-red-flags/
Influential study touting ChatGPT in education retracted over red flags

The retracted study on ChatGPT in education was already cited hundreds of times.

Ars Technica
May 11 at 6:07pmWeb
Show threadTuomo Valkonen1d ago

What is the alternative then, you ask? The story itself shows the alternative: posterior #OrganicPeerView based on real use, not bureaucracy.

https://mastodon.social/@tuomov/116548197725315189