The Page Isn’t Dead, Your Attention Is Under Siege
Every few years we are invited to attend the same funeral. Someone declares that nobody reads anymore, that the printed page is finished, that books are an aging technology destined to become a museum object while the living culture migrates to earbuds and short video. It is a tempting story because it flatters our sense that we are witnessing a clean break with the past, a decisive turn of the wheel.
But there is an immediate problem with the obituary. You are reading this right now, right?
That small fact does not prove that reading is thriving, but it does expose the real situation: the page is not dead so much as displaced. Reading has been pushed from the center of ordinary daily life into the margins between pings, feeds, meetings, errands, exhaustion, and the restless need to check what someone else is saying somewhere else.
The more accurate question is not whether books are dead, but what kinds of reading are being replaced, by what, and who benefits from the replacement.
Begin with what refuses to disappear. Print persists, stubbornly, in a market that has had more than enough time to abandon it if abandonment were truly inevitable. In U.S. print tracking that publishers and booksellers use, print book unit sales in 2024 totaled roughly 782.7 million, a slight increase over 2023, and notable precisely because it contradicts the simplistic narrative of collapse.
Now set beside it the other undeniable reality: audio is not a novelty. It is a major growth engine, and it is rapidly becoming the default way many people “read” books in the practical sense of finishing them.
The Audio Publishers Association reported U.S. audiobook sales revenue of $2.22 billion in 2024, up 13 percent over 2023, with digital audiobooks accounting for virtually all revenue. Industry reporting from the Association of American Publishers likewise places digital audio well into the multi-billion-dollar range and growing strongly year over year.
So the honest headline is not that books are dead. The honest headline is that books are mutating into a two-body system: print persists as a durable cultural technology, while audio expands as the most convenient literary delivery system ever built. The question is what this mutation does to attention, comprehension, memory, and the moral habits that a serious reading culture quietly trains.
Here is where the real crisis lives, and it is not a format war.
It is the collapse of leisure reading as a daily practice. A major study published in iScience, drawing on the nationally representative American Time Use Survey from 2003 to 2023, reports a sharp drop in the share of Americans who read for pleasure on an average day, from roughly 28 percent in 2004 to about 16 percent in 2023. The same research emphasizes widening disparities by income, education, race, and geography, which should trouble anyone who still believes reading is part of a democratic baseline rather than a luxury good for the secure.
It is worth saying plainly what is at stake. Reading is not only entertainment. It is one of the few broadly accessible disciplines that trains sustained attention, inference, patience, perspective-taking, and the capacity to follow an argument beyond a slogan. When that habit shrinks, it is not merely culture that changes; it is citizenship that thins.
Why does it feel, in the body, as if nobody reads? Because the default posture of modern media is designed to fracture the mind. The attention economy does not merely offer alternatives to reading; it profits from making deep attention difficult. That is why the battle is less about paper versus headphones and more about whether anyone can still defend unbroken time against systems engineered to interrupt it.
Across the contemporary media landscape, the pattern is visible in sober measurement. Recent national communications data in the United Kingdom reports substantial daily online time for adults and heavy use of platform video, including YouTube, which has become a default entertainment and information channel.
Even if you resist importing one country’s metrics into another’s conclusions, the direction remains unmistakable: devices have shifted the human posture from sit down and attend to carry it with you and sample.
At this point, many people reach for a comforting relativism: perhaps listening is simply the new reading, perhaps it is all the same, perhaps we should stop worrying. I reject the smug sneer that listening is cheating, because it is historically illiterate and culturally vain. For most of human history, literature lived in voice: in recitation, sermon, theater, public reading, storytelling. Audio is not a betrayal of literature. It is one of literature’s native bodies returning with modern convenience.
But the return of voice does not erase the distinct cognitive environment of the page. Listening is not inferior. It is different. Scholarly reviews comparing audiobook listening and print reading emphasize again and again that outcomes depend on context, text type, and learner characteristics, which is another way of saying that the medium shapes the mind in specific, contingent ways.
Listening is temporal and flowing; it can deepen immersion and restore tone, pacing, irony, and emotion through performance. Yet it can also invite passivity when treated as background noise, a productivity hack, a way to consume a book while doing something else. The art of listening, like the art of reading, requires intention, and our era trains intention poorly.
The printed page survives not because it is romantic, but because it performs certain tasks better than anything else. A printed book is finite, quiet, and spatial.
It does not ping.
It offers stable visual architecture, which matters when you are following a complex argument, revisiting earlier claims, tracking structure, or simply trying to remember where an idea lived on the page.
This is not nostalgia; it is cognition. Large-scale research syntheses comparing reading comprehension on paper versus screens have found a modest but consistent comprehension advantage for paper in many settings, with the size of the gap influenced by factors such as time pressure and reading purpose. Screens can host deep reading, yes, but most screens are not designed to protect it. Most screens are designed to keep you moving.
If there is a single sentence that captures the future, it is this: print will increasingly become a premium environment for attention, while audio will increasingly become the most widespread on-ramp to books. Consumer research from the audiobook industry reports that a majority of American adults have listened to an audiobook, which makes audio not an edge case but a normalized channel for literary experience.
There is another force constricting reading that has nothing to do with social video and everything to do with power: restriction. If we speak honestly about the death of reading, we must name the political and institutional assault on access.
PEN America’s reporting on U.S. public school book bans for the 2023 to 2024 school year documents 10,046 instances of bans affecting 4,231 unique titles. The American Library Association’s data for 2024 reports hundreds of censorship attempts across libraries, schools, and universities, involving thousands of titles. A society does not innocently drift away from books while simultaneously organizing to remove books from young readers’ reach. One is a technological pressure; the other is a deliberate project.
So what is the future of the word on the page? It will not die off, but it will change its social role. Reading will become less default and more chosen, more ritualized. People will read the way some people now cook from scratch: as an act that signals values, protects mental health, and asserts autonomy against convenience.
That is a loss, because reading as a democratic baseline is better than reading as a boutique practice, but it is also a realistic description of where our incentives have pushed us.
The book will also become more explicitly multi-modal.
Not in the shallow sense of attaching gimmicks to text, but in the practical sense that many works will live as a set: print for study and annotation, audio for performance and immersion, digital text for portability and search. Industry survey work already suggests emerging tensions about synthetic narration versus human performance, pointing toward a future in which audio splits into low-cost synthetic delivery and premium human interpretation.
And the word will become more contested, not less. As reading time becomes scarcer and access becomes more politicized, books become sharper symbols.
That is exactly why they are targeted. It is also why libraries, schools, and independent bookstores remain civic institutions rather than mere retailers. The future of the page will be decided less by technology than by whether citizens insist that access to ideas is not negotiable.
If you want the historical arc, it is not a clean fall from Eden but a long series of shifts in media attention. Industrial printing expanded mass literacy and mass publishing; television displaced some leisure reading; early digital text and then smartphones turned reading into an always-available screen activity; algorithmic short-form video normalized rapid sampling as a default leisure pattern. By the early 2020s, measurable decline in daily pleasure reading had become stark even as print unit sales remained resilient and audio revenues surged.
The lesson is that forms persist. What changes is the ecology of attention.
My conclusion is simple and unsentimental. Books are not dead. Print is not finished. Audio is not the enemy. The real enemy is the conversion of human attention into a strip-mined resource, and the use of moral panic to restrict access to what remains.
A culture that abandons deep reading does not merely lose a pastime. It loses a mode of thought that underwrites serious self-government.
So yes, the word will transform. It will hybridize. It will travel by paper and by voice and by pixels. But whether it dies off depends on something far more basic than format.
It depends on whether we still believe, stubbornly and publicly, that sustained attention is a virtue, that access to books is a civic right, and that the interior life is not an inconvenience to be optimized away.
And if you are reading this right now, you already know the page is not dead. You are holding it open.
#audiobooks #bolesBooks #davidBoles #digtal #ereader #experience #life #meaning #reading #silo #socialMedia #words
Kpop News Hub
Dining and Cooking
Gay Curmudgeon
David Boles
Joel Savage
Hatsa
Harri
William Weber Berrutti
