Simple solution is to have users produce the service for themselves. Now the use value is also motivation for production. This is the idea of "scratch your own itch" in free software. This is also the idea of selfhosting.
Everybody doesn't have resources to selfhost. My solution is #cohosting. Share the load of hosting with enough people that everybody has resources to contribute their share.

@maiyannah @bob I agree with what both of you are saying here. I would add that I think #CoHosting is probably a more realistic long-term approach than #SelfHosting for most people, although I encourage those with the skills and time to self-host, and I can see that doing so is a good way to gain the experience that allows people to share in the work of maintaining co-hosting operations like #RiseUp, #Framasoft, or #Disroot (or what I call 'digital cafes').

@bhaugen maybe we can achieve a level of digital literacy where everyone is a power user, and maybe not. But even if we can, getting to a point where there are 2-3 power users in every extended family/ community, capable of running #CoHosting for them, would be a pitstop on the way to full P2P, and a big improvement on the #DataFarming that dominates the internet today.

@bhaugen sure, what I'm getting at is the ideal, expressed by some people (usually only online), that the end game is for every net user to self-host everything they use, and for groups to consist of clusters of self-hosters. Many pieces, loosely coupled, as it were. For the reason Rich gives in his piece, I see a network of '#CoHosting' small groups as the end goal, obviously with accommodations made for membership in multiple groups, incorporating self-hosters, and so on.