Engineers run the AI evals. But who decides what “good” actually means? If your criteria only measure what’s easy, your product will optimize for the wrong things. Should designers and PMs own eval criteria? Let’s debate.
#AIEvals #ProductDesign #UX #AgenticAI #DesignLeadership #UXforAI #AIUX
https://www.designative.info/2026/05/05/ai-evals-for-designers-and-product-managers-why-criteria-matter-most/
AI Evals for Designers and Product Managers: Why Criteria Matter Most » { design@tive } information design
Evals aren't just an engineering concern. The criteria that define their value — what "good" means for users — also belong to designers and PMs.
If agentic systems hide their reasoning, trust collapses.
What if interaction wasn’t about issuing commands—but about questioning, negotiating, and governing autonomy? This post argues interaction is where trust is earned. #humanagentcentereddesign #AI #UXforAI #mlUX #AIUX #AgenticAI
https://www.designative.info/2026/01/15/designing-human-agent-interaction-principles-for-trustworthy-collaboration/
Designing Human-Agent Interaction: Principles for Trustworthy Collaboration » { design@tive } information design
Agentic systems demand new interaction models: visible reasoning, preserved human control, trust via dialogue—not blind automation.
We’ve spent decades perfecting user flows. But what happens when AI collapses the steps and users just express outcomes? Is “flow” still a useful concept in modern UX—or do we need a new mental model entirely? Let’s debate. #AI #AgenticAI #HumanAgentCenteredDesign #InteractionDesign #InterfaceDesign #UX #ConversationDesign #UXforAI
https://www.designative.info/2025/11/20/flows-age-agentic-ai-what-if-our-core-ux-models-no-longer-apply/
Flows in the Age of Agentic AI: Our Core UX Models No Longer Apply? » { design@tive } information design
Design is shifting from mapping steps to understanding intentions. What happens to user flows when Agents perform the work instead of humans?
Itamar Medeiros