Well, even before LLMs writing papers, even before the internet & digital publishing, we were already in deep problems w/ #science-publishing + peer review + #replication & quality. That's why it's so big now that it cannot be ignored any longer. Among the changes needed are mentioned in the OP.
Fraud, AI slop and huge profits: is science publishing broken? – podcast #Science #Other #SciencePublishing #AIinResearch #AcademicIntegrity
https://purescience.news/article?id=959761
Fraud, AI slop and huge profits: is science publishing broken? – podcast

Scientists are warning that academic publishing needs urgent reform in order to retain trust in the research system. Ian Sample tells Madeleine Finlay what has gone so wrong, and Dr Mark Hanson of the University of Exeter proposes some potential solutions Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? Continue reading...

Pure Science News
Fraud, AI slop and huge profits: is science publishing broken? – podcast #Science #Other #SciencePublishing #AIinResearch #AcademicIntegrity
https://purescience.news/article?id=959761
Fraud, AI slop and huge profits: is science publishing broken? – podcast

Scientists are warning that academic publishing needs urgent reform in order to retain trust in the research system. Ian Sample tells Madeleine Finlay what has gone so wrong, and Dr Mark Hanson of the University of Exeter proposes some potential solutions Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? Continue reading...

Pure Science News
Fraud, AI slop and huge profits: is science publishing broken? – podcast #Science #Other #SciencePublishing #AIinResearch #AcademicIntegrity
https://purescience.news/article?id=959761
Fraud, AI slop and huge profits: is science publishing broken? – podcast

Scientists are warning that academic publishing needs urgent reform in order to retain trust in the research system. Ian Sample tells Madeleine Finlay what has gone so wrong, and Dr Mark Hanson of the University of Exeter proposes some potential solutions Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? Continue reading...

Pure Science News

Elbakyan is an unabashed utopian. “Science should belong to scientists and not the publishers,” she told me in an email. In a letter to the court, she cited Article 27 of the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights, asserting the right “to share in scientific advancement and its benefits”.

Whatever the fate of Sci-Hub, it seems that frustration with the current system is growing. But history shows that betting against science publishers is a risky move. After all, back in 1988, Maxwell predicted that in the future there would only be a handful of immensely powerful publishing companies left, and that they would ply their trade in an electronic age with no printing costs, leading to almost “pure profit”. That sounds a lot like the world we live in now.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

#Scihub #SciencePublishing

Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?

The long read: It is an industry like no other, with profit margins to rival Google – and it was created by one of Britain’s most notorious tycoons: Robert Maxwell

The Guardian
Another great article by @[email protected] on the current #SciencePublishing system. Don't publish with for-profit publishers like Elsevier, Springer Nature, et al. It's really simple. There are so many cool #PlantScience society journals. #SciPub See also: bsky.app/profile/soms...

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:c4ovrfqv6g2kwzgdkiibwrj3/post/3k52ufjtsf22z


The one science reform we can ...

From labs to journals, women are driving science forward, linking diversity to stronger research cultures.

🔗 https://phys.org/news/2026-02-celebrating-women-future-science-scholarly.html

#WomenInSTEM #GenderEquity #SciencePublishing #InclusiveScience #WomenInScience

Celebrating the women shaping the future of science and scholarly publishing

To mark the United Nations' International Day of Women and Girls in Science, the Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing celebrate women who are advancing scientific discovery and help to build a research culture where everyone can thrive.

Phys.org
@drs1969 I agree that APCs are VAT-able, but in practice only independent authors pay VAT, as for publications by most researchers APCs are usually paid by institutions or funders with a VAT registration.
As for ©, yes, it's a right. But it has an essential value to publishers, so they require it to be transferred, as a kind of 'payment'. Perhaps one of our followers knows if in principle this transaction is taxable for VAT purposes.
#copyright #VAT #SalesTax #SciencePublishing

Reformation of Science Publishing: The Stockholm Declaration
Full declaration: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.251805
Video: https://sciii-it.org/stockholm-declaration/
Sign the Declaration: https://sciii-it.org/stockholm-declaration/#cosign

🧪 #AcademicsSky #SciencePublishing #ScienceIntegrity @royalsociety.org
@royalsocietypublishing.org @scienceacademyswe.bsky.social #RoyalSwedishAcademyOfSciences