RE: https://scicomm.xyz/@ORCID_Org/116641396465428683

"Science has a [...] set of infrastructure for handling identity, provenance, integrity, and discoverability. Systems like arXiv, DOIs, CrossRef, Datacite, ORCID, OpenAlex, ROR, Retraction Watch, and PubMed form a kind of collaborative exoskeleton for scientific publishing and by extension, for modern scientific knowledge. Much as Github has been adapted for AI development, this infrastructure needs to be adapted for AI use in science."

#ai
#pids
#openalex
#retractionwatch
#ORCID
#ROR
#DOI

Black marks on published papers don’t change citation rates, new study finds

Among the data analyzed were mean monthly citations per article for 151 papers that were retracted or issued some other editorial notice, and for a set of control articles. The solid vertical lines…

Retraction Watch

A recent study highlights just how inexpensive and easy it is to purchase authorship in an academic paper. In some cases, it can be as little as $57.

https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2026/04/28/how-much-does-it-cost-to-purchase-authorship-in-an-academic-paper/

#ResearchIntegrity #AcademicIntegrity #Plagiarism #RetractionWatch

How Much Does it Cost to Purchase Authorship in an Academic Paper?

A recent study highlights just how inexpensive and easy it is to purchase authorship in an academic paper. In some cases, it can be as little as $57.

Plagiarism Today

Weekend reads: An alternative to the #impactfactor in China; the clinical trials of six ‘superretractors’; Retraction Watch goes to Capitol Hill – #RetractionWatch

China proposes a new way to measure academic influence in a departure from impact factor.”

https://retractionwatch.com/2026/04/18/weekend-reads-alternative-impact-factor-china-clinical-trials-superretractors-retraction-watch-goes-to-capitol-hill/

Weekend reads: An alternative to the impact factor in China; the clinical trials of six ‘superretractors’; Retraction Watch goes to Capitol Hill

If your week flew by — we know ours did — catch up here with what you might have missed. The week at Retraction Watch featured: Scientist who alleged COVID cover-up circulated a faked NIH email, ag…

Retraction Watch
Could a national database of scientific misconduct rulings stop repeat offenders?

Mark Barnes (courtesy of Ropes and Gray LLC) In an editorial published today in Science, Michael Lauer and Mark Barnes call for greater transparency in investigations of scientific misconduct with …

Retraction Watch

Weekend reads: ‘Don’t hate the replicator, hate the game’; Crossref finds 150K incorrect citation links in database; Announcing our Ctrl-Z award – #RetractionWatch
Economist discusses “internationally crowdsourced surveillance system, designed to keep social scientists honest”
ET
By Alexi Horowitz-Ghazi
Mary Childs
Jess Jiang
James Sneed
Emma Peaslee

https://retractionwatch.com/2026/03/14/weekend-reads-replication-games-crossref-incorrect-citation-links-database-announcing-our-ctrl-z-award/

Weekend reads: ‘Don’t hate the replicator, hate the game’; Crossref finds 150K incorrect citation links in database; Announcing our Ctrl-Z award

If your week flew by — we know ours did — catch up here with what you might have missed. The week at Retraction Watch featured: Stolen economics study retracted following Retraction Watch coverage …

Retraction Watch

Scammy research publishers. It is all about the money these days.
I hope people can afford to sue them.

"In a 2024 article in the Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Graham Kendall, the deputy vice chancellor at MILA University in Nilai, Malaysia, detailed possible connections between Walsh Medical Media and the publishing group OMICS. In 2019, OMICS was ordered to pay the U.S. government $50 million in 2019 for “unfair and deceptive practices.” "

https://retractionwatch.com/2026/03/05/publisher-demands-500-from-impersonated-author-to-retract-paper/

#RetractionWatch #Research

Publisher demands $500 from impersonated author to retract paper

Last year, we wrote about a Walsh Medical Media journal that refused to withdraw an author’s paper unless he paid a fee — even though he didn’t write or submit the article. For one reader, some det…

Retraction Watch

If you were as irritated as I was when #RetractionWatch of all outlets uncritically linked to a sensationalist article celebrating Ulrike #Guerot of all people as a martyr - the conspiratorial academic convicted of #plagiarism by an actual court.

Well, then you now have the chance to do better. :)

https://centerforscientificintegrity.org/2026/02/26/announcing-the-retraction-watch-research-accountability-reporting-fellowship/

Announcing the Retraction Watch Research Accountability Reporting Fellowship - The Center for Scientific Integrity

Retraction Watch and The Open Notebook are thrilled to announce a new fellowship program funded by The Center for Scientific Integrity. This six-month program will equip up to six reporters and editors at local newsrooms to report stories of scientific integrity unfolding at research universities or institutions in their areas.  The scientific process is designed […]

The Center for Scientific Integrity
Exclusive: Unrest at Wiley journal whose EIC is cited in more than half of its papers

Timothy Lee (center) of Macau University of Science and Technology was named editor-in-chief of the International Journal of Tourism Research in 2023. On Feb. 18, a researcher in Italy sent a disgr…

Retraction Watch
"Zitiert und nicht bemerkt? So hilft Retraction Watch, zurückgezogene Artikel zu finden" erkärt @flohnsen im Blog der @tub:
https://www.tub.tuhh.de/blog/2026/02/23/retraction-watch-zurueckgezogene-artikel/
#RetractionWatch
Zitiert und nicht bemerkt? So hilft Retraction Watch, zurückgezogene Artikel zu finden - Universitätsbibliothek TU Hamburg

Retraction Watch unterstützt dabei, zurückgezogene wissenschaftliche Artikel zu erkennen. In diesem Beitrag stellen wir den Service vor.

Universitätsbibliothek TU Hamburg