Even if you can't see it, digital technologies, products & services also cause emissions. 🏭 Data centers, cloud storage, streaming services, AI tools, and the like may run quietly, but they consume a lot of electricity. ♻️ We are doing something about this and support myclimate with our annual climate protection contribution: this year, it was CHF 4,326 to compensate 173 tons of carbon dioxide. 👉 More info: https://nine.ch/en/infrastructure/ #climateprotection #contribution #offsetting #myclimate #nine

(Incidentally, #offsetting doesn't work for carbon emmissions so I don't see why it would for livestock butchery)

https://theconversation.com/we-have-officially-advised-our-university-to-ditch-carbon-offsets-and-focus-on-cutting-emissions-243727

We have officially advised our university to ditch carbon offsets – and focus on cutting emissions

Your organisation should probably ditch offsets too.

The Conversation

The burning of #wood in power and heat stations, and the industrial use of #charcoal, are expanding rapidly worldwide, at the expense of forests (and therefore our future).

This is driven by a combination of renewable energy targets and subsidies, #coal phaseout policies that support wood #biomass as an alternative, the exemption of biomass from carbon taxes and pricing and, in parts of the global South, carbon-#offsetting schemes.

https://www.boell.de/en/2025/03/14/forest-furnace

From Forest to Furnace | Heinrich Böll Stiftung

The burning of wood for energy is increasing worldwide, putting pressure on forests and ecosystems. This paper analyzes the development in Europe, North America, East Asia, Africa, and South America.

Heinrich Böll Stiftung
German environment minister promises better fraud prevention in wake of fake climate projects in China

Clean Energy Wire

Ryanair, Delta, Lufthansa, Easyjet among 71 airlines warned over potential greenwashing

Environmental groups have warned 71 #airlines operating out of Schiphol airport that they must respect the #greenwashing limits clarified by the legal precedent-setting Dutch Court ruling against KLM in March this year.

ClientEarth, Fossielvrij and Reclame Fossielvrij have sent a legal letter warning that airlines should not promote common industry claims about ‘sustainable aviation fuels’, #offsetting and #NetZero by 2050 as they are likely to be unlawful.

https://www.clientearth.org/latest/press-office/press/ryanair-delta-lufthansa-easyjet-among-71-airlines-warned-over-potential-greenwashing/

#Climate #ClimateChange #Collapse #aviation #biofuels

Ryanair, Delta, Lufthansa, Easyjet among 71 airlines warned over potential greenwashing

View the press release

Interesting new foresight report by UNEP. Among many other issues it highlights misinformation, surging #fossil fuel subsidies, and corruption in carbon #offsetting https://www.unep.org/resources/global-foresight-report
A global foresight report on planetary health and human wellbeing

To help navigate current and future uncertainty and disruptive change, while effectively delivering on its mandate, UNEP has been implementing an institutionalized approach to strategic foresight and horizon scanning with the view to developing an anticipatory and future-oriented culture.

UNEP - UN Environment Programme
“Swift could plant trees in a creative way. Suppose Swift created an Eras forest in every city she visits and located them in the poorest neighborhoods…urban forests create additional benefits, such as improving air quality and reducing heat-island effect. These benefits are especially important in low-income communities with lower canopy cover” #Offsetting #Climate https://www.forbes.com/sites/prakashdolsak/2024/02/25/eras-forests-could-offset-taylor-swifts-carbon-footprint/amp/
Eras Forests Could Offset Taylor Swift’s Carbon Footprint

Instead of buying offsets, Swift working with NGOs could establish Eras forests in low-income neighborhoods. She could disclose the amount of sequestered carbon annually.

Forbes

"How meat and milk companies are racing to ease your climate guilt."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2024/01/22/meat-climate-impact-tyson-hopdoddys/?pwapi_token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJyZWFzb24iOiJnaWZ0IiwibmJmIjoxNzA1ODk5NjAwLCJpc3MiOiJzdWJzY3JpcHRpb25zIiwiZXhwIjoxNzA3MjgxOTk5LCJpYXQiOjE3MDU4OTk2MDAsImp0aSI6ImRlNGNjNjNlLTJjOWYtNDg0OC04OWEzLTFkYzM0MGM1NDE0MSIsInVybCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lndhc2hpbmd0b25wb3N0LmNvbS9jbGltYXRlLWVudmlyb25tZW50LzIwMjQvMDEvMjIvbWVhdC1jbGltYXRlLWltcGFjdC10eXNvbi1ob3Bkb2RkeXMvIn0.wFGmMWYI80_RG13Ir1UzTK7fsNIpm7kbSwtUvtFqBKs

WaPo finally posted a modest critique of meat industry greenwashing.

<💬>
Under another new California law, companies also must disclose the emissions created throughout their supply chains, and the Securities and Exchange Commission is working on a similar requirement.

It all has big food companies rushing to show progress in cutting emissions, particularly after so many of them promised to zero out their net release of greenhouse gases — known as going “carbon neutral” — by 2050 or earlier, in alignment with the Paris agreement on global warming. In the backdrop is a contentious debate over how those companies should calculate their carbon footprints.

The fight has shifted to an obscure independent organization called the GHG Protocol, a group made up of corporations, scientists and environmental groups that writes accounting rules for greenhouse gas emissions that will guide what climate claims companies can make under new state laws.

Among the companies involved in determining when and how farming and harvesting methods can be used to erase the emissions impact of products like hamburgers and dairy are McDonald’s, Nestlé and the Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef, to which meat giants Tyson Foods and Cargill belong.

The deliberations of the GHG Protocol, which is managed by the World Resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, are kept confidential. But discord spilled into public in the fall, following its publication of draft guidelines for farm and forestry emissions. Dozens of environmental groups and academics say the rules as proposed would allow companies to declare climate-unfriendly products such as lumber, paper, beef and milk carbon neutral — or even carbon negative — by making modest land use adjustments that don’t truly mitigate the emissions of those products.
</💬>

There's certainly going to be more and more tension due to these corporations trying to find better greenwashing, better methods of faking data, more sophisticated bullshit.

It's going to get a lot worse before they lose.

#climate #carbon #carbonNeutral #netZero #meat #dairy #meatIndustry #GHG #greenwashing #regenerative #grazing #regenerativeGrazing #astroPasturing #offset #offsetting #PR #carbonNegative

How meat and milk companies are racing to ease your climate guilt

A climate-friendly hamburger? A carbon-neutral glass of milk? As companies make bold claims, a heated debate erupts.

The Washington Post
EU bans ‘misleading’ environmental claims that rely on offsetting

Products and services billed as climate neutral, biodegradable or eco must provide proof, with carbon schemes banned as evidence

The Guardian
European parliament MEPs have voted to outlaw use of terms such as “environmentally friendly”, “natural”, “biodegradable”, “climate neutral” or “eco” without evidence, while introducing a total ban on using carbon #offsetting schemes to substantiate claims https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/17/eu-bans-misleading-environmental-claims-that-rely-on-offsetting
EU bans ‘misleading’ environmental claims that rely on offsetting

Products and services billed as climate neutral, biodegradable or eco must provide proof, with carbon schemes banned as evidence

The Guardian