The Dice Are Always Loaded

Our money is evolving as debt; it represents debt, and at this late date, debt with interest. It has been evolving as debt for 5000 years, and David Graeber explained this evolution in detail.

But evolution does not confer correctness on a definition. Indeed, evolution is a process of trial and error, and the errors are eliminated without mercy.

Money is almost universally regarded as a claim on a nation’s wealth: an idea we share, and this makes sense to us because debt is an idea. Everybody knows what money is.

It Ain’t What You Don’t Know That Gets You Into Trouble. It’s What You Know for Sure That Just Ain’t So” – Josh Billings.

What if money really represents something else?

If a fisherman and a baker meet on a road and exchange 2 fish for 5 loaves, they are not swapping ideas. If the baker had money, not loaves, the fisherman would not go home to chew on a conjecture offered by someone he’d never met. Money as debt correctly abandons barter as an origin story, just as Graeber explains. It also incorrectly eliminates trade without trust, carelessly abandoning the simplest possible exchange of goods.

“Money is a commodity—and it can be anything—that a society agrees to accept in exchange for every other commodity or service within that society. It ultimately represents the work the holder of the money exchanged with that society to get it.”

Ideas are not subject to the Laws of Thermodynamics; work is.

And if money represents work, it must also be subject to those laws.

And it turns out that the Laws are radically anti-capitalistic.

In The Dice Are Always Loaded, I offer a different understanding of money and ownership. This connects money to the laws of the universe and overturns the money tables in the temple of Mammon. War, Inequality, Overconsumption, Environmental devastation, Planned Obsolescence, and Slavery; all the messes our human societies keep making can be found here.  

Most essays about our terrible problems end there and offer no real solutions. After providing the evidence and logic for its definitions, The Dice Are Always Loaded discusses in detail how a functioning human society operates within the laws, from advertising to farming to delivering truthful news to an entire society.

I call the resulting socio-economic system “Mahinism,” because “Mahi” is te Reo Māori for “work.”

To understand better just how disruptive this understanding is, here are the Laws as they apply to money.

First Law: Ownership of anything cannot make money. Conservation of Energy applies.

Second Law: Money cannot be a lasting store of value. Entropy applies.

Consider the business model of a bank: it collects interest on the money it loans to you because it owns the money it lends to you.

Consider the business model of a Landlord, who collects rent without doing work. A society that rejects these things is possible, but it is very different from what we do today.

We are paying people who are not working for their ownership of the things we need to live. As a result, they have massive piles of money with which to purchase Members of Parliament, Senators, Congressmen, Supreme Court Justices, and Presidents. They own our laws, and when that is not sufficient, they buy our news media to ensure we never see the truth.

It needs to stop.

The people in the owning class are not all bad, but “the love of money is the root of all evil” is one of the basic truths of our major religions. The problem is not the people; it is the existence of the massive piles of money and the ease with which they corrupt even the best governments.

The Dice Are Always Loaded draws on many sources, but it was first written by an engineer using only the Laws; that was 15 years ago, and the author cites several previous efforts. It is not the first attempt to correct our error in defining money, but it may be the last chance for human civilization before nature erases our mistake.

=================

This is, technically, the second edition of “Making Money Real.” It exists because self-help books about money are ignored by people who might be interested in dismantling Capitalism. References on this site may include aspects of the first book. This post, however, becomes the anchor for everything else I do.

The book is to be published through “YourBooks” in New Zealand, and through “Draft2Digital” elsewhere in the world. New Zealand gets color printing. Greyscale images for everyone else. I can’t afford fancy.

The errata pages will change over shortly.

#anticapitalism #climate #degrowth #economics #environment #history #marxism #philosophy #politics #society #writing
Understanding Marxism: Q&A with Richard D. Wolff [June 2019]

YouTube

@deepmud 2,000 year old #Bible verse that Elon Musk and the USA #Christians #Church do not ever repeat.

Bible verse "1 John 3:17" and apply it to #Murdoch , Putin , Trump, Musk

Even many year 2026 social media users claim "Karl Marx Germany" February 1848 is where the ideas come from #Marxism - but open The Bible book to verse "1 John 3:17"

"With more than 100 million people, #WestBengal electorate is larger than #Germany's"

West Bengal - argumentative and steeped in a self-image of cultural exceptionalism - remained stubbornly resistant to #BJP and #Modi, until now.

It went from hard-Left #Communism / #Marxism for more than 3 decades before electing a centrist party, and now it has taken a #FarRight turn under #BhartiyaJantaParty, the Party known for its #Hindutva nationalist/religious zeal.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8pdvp5x5ro

West Bengal: Modi's BJP conquers one of India's toughest political frontiers

West Bengal’s verdict could reshape not just the state’s politics, but the future trajectory of Modi’s BJP.

In #Poland there was one interesting figure Iwo Czerniawski that was active on the left-wing scene back in 2000’s but since then largely became disillusioned, cynical and retracted himself from political life. Nonetheless, I’ve recently stumbled upon one of his few public statements made in 2022[^1] and wanted to highlight it, as it’s a textbook example of the mess that long-term exposure to #Marxism historical materialism makes of people’s brains.

There are a number of reasons why this had to happen. Russian intervention in Ukraine was inevitable. This is not a conflict between Russia and Ukraine. It is an attempt to establish a new geopolitical order, according to the experts responsible for shaping Russia’s current policy – a measures deemed essential to safeguard Russian statehood.

Let’s hold here - “measures deemed essential to safeguard Russian statehood” – which statehood exactly and “deemed essential” by whom?

“Deemed essential” by Putin in order to protect Putin’s self-perpetuating kleptocracy? That’s the only context where this statement makes sense semantically.

But what exactly laws of physics compel Russian society to live under such a system? Did anyone actually ask Russian society if they want to live under such “statehood” and “protect it”?

Well, obviously there’s no objective reasons for any of the above. This thinking where “Russia is compelled” it is solely the result of the internalisation of historical determinism, which is extremely contagious among former Marxists. In other words, they believe “Russia must” do things because that is what the “iron laws of history” dictate. And this is, of course, pseudoscientific nonsense, a kind of quasi-religious belief with no factual evidence.

In the quoted paragraph, we find plenty of these “musts”. Let me highlight the sheer absurdity of this narrative – on the one hand, Russia is the largest country in the world and Putin the most powerful ruler, and all it takes is for Putin to “raise an eyebrow for Kyiv to fall” (a direct quote from Solovyov).

And at the same time, this omnipotent Putin and this mighty Russia are constantly “having to” do something. First, he “had to” take over all state and public media; then he “had to” kill journalists; then he “had to” violate the constitution by running for a third term; then he “had to” annex Crimea, and so on. Now he has reached the stage where he “has to” put 1.5 million Russians through the meat grinder… for what exactly? To capture Pleshchiyivka in the Donetsk Oblast?

The double think of people who subscribe to this strange brand of historicism lies precisely in the fact that, on the one hand, with a certain masochistic zeal, they admire Putin’s omnipotent, extremely authoritarian system, which is not constrained by all this “democratic drivel”; and on the other hand, in the very same breath, they deny Putin any agency whatsoever, reducing him to the role of a passive pawn of some mysterious laws of history. And they switch between these entirely opposing narratives as they wish.

Well, but when it comes to double think, fans of Marxism and materialist dialectics have never had a problem. 😉

[^1]: https://efir7.pl/artykuly/co-robic-konflikt-na-ukrainie-2022-potrzebna-nowa-cywilizacja-moje-stanowisko-iwo

Co robić? Konflikt na Ukrainie 2022. Potrzebna nowa cywilizacja! Moje stanowisko – Iwo Czerniawski  | Efir7

Napiszę jednym tchem. Bo mogę. Jestem w stanie. Myślę, że nikt z Was nie był tak blisko tych sił, które odpowiadają za projektowanie współczesnej polityki rosyjskiej. Ja byłem, ja poznałem, zgłębiłem. Jak również byłem blisko, najbliżej sił, które w ogromnym stopniu stanowiły o kształcie rosyjskiej opozycji. Co ciekawe – mają one jeden rodowód. Anpilow, Udalcow, Limonow, Dugin… Chociaż przyznaję, że moje obszary działań i badań były znacznie szersze. KPRF, trockiści, praktycznie cała lewa strona w Rosji. I nie tylko.    

Shortages, inflation and stagnation

Last week, crude oil prices in Asia hit a new high at $125/b amid reports that the US was considering military action against Iran to break the deadlock in peace talks. The global average oil price…

Michael Roberts Blog

To summarise the differences.

State
Marxism: a tool to seize and use for transition
Anarchism: to be abolished immediately

Revolution
M: a transition
A: immediate

Power
M: dictatorship of the proletariat
A: reject centralised power

Political Organisation
M: coordination can be central
A: horizontal

Class
M: materialism (so economic)
A: critique of all hierarchies, also patriarchy, white supremacy...

Philosophy
M: method, analysis
A: ethics

Mutual critique
Marxists find anarchists utopian.
Anarchists find marxists authoritarian.

It's important to note that this is extremely (!!) reductive. I'm sharing it because basics come first, then you can start building nuance.

#marxism #anarchism #revolution #communism

The First International and the Paris Commune bring us the the split in socialism.

  • The Second International was created in 1889, and continued the work of the First. It followed Marxism, expelled anarchists, and focused on parliamentary political action.

  • The Anti-Authoritarion International was a split organisation from the First International. They existed from lasted from 1872 until 1877, and they were anarchists.

This is the main internal division in socialism, between communists and anarchists. Both are very much against capitalism, but disagree on how to organise for the end of it.

#anarchism #communism #marxism #anticapitalism

Two: the Paris Commune.

The Paris Commune was a revolutionary city council that ruled over Paris for 72 days in 1871. They seized power and installed free schools, created shelters for homeless people, abolished child labour, mandated equal pay etc. After two months, the French army took back control.

The aftermath of this was twofold. Firstly, it raised class consciousness and increased militancy by a great deal. But secondly, it also created a lot of disagreements. According to Marx there is a need for political action, but according to Bakunin it's more important to cancel the state. Marx sees centralised authority as a transitional option, but anarchists are against all state authority.

#anarchism #ParisCommune #marxism #communism

Next up: history.

About the First International, the Paris Commune, and the socialist split.

One: the First International.
The International Workingmen's Association, known as the First International, was an organisation campaigning for workers' rights. They existed from 1864 to 1876. They organised strikes all over Europe, and showed the usefulness of unions and class solidarity. They weren't revolutionary, in that they didn't aim at dismantling the system, but this was a very foundational moment.

#anarchy #FirstInternational #iwa #marxism #communism