“There is no such thing as a dysfunctional organization, because every organization is perfectly aligned to achieve the results it currently gets”*…

… and if we’re not careful, we might not be too pleased with what we get. Sam Altman says the one-person billion-dollar company is coming. Evan Ratliff tells the tale of his attempt to build a completely AI-automated venture…

… If you’ve spent any time consuming any AI news this year—and even if you’ve tried desperately not to—you may have heard that in the industry, 2025 is the “year of the agent.” This year, in other words, is the year when AI systems are evolving from passive chatbots, waiting to field our questions, to active players, out there working on our behalf.

There’s not a well agreed upon definition of AI agents, but generally you can think of them as versions of large language model chatbots that are given autonomy in the world. They are able to take in information, navigate digital space, and take action. There are elementary agents, like customer service assistants that can independently field, triage, and handle inbound calls, or sales bots that can cycle through email lists and spam the good leads. There are programming agents, the foot soldiers of vibe coding. OpenAI and other companies have launched “agentic browsers” that can buy plane tickets and proactively order groceries for you.

In the year of our agent, 2025, the AI hype flywheel has been spinning up ever more grandiose notions of what agents can be and will do. Not just as AI assistants, but as full-fledged AI employees that will work alongside us, or instead of us. “What jobs are going to be made redundant in a world where I am sat here as a CEO with a thousand AI agents?” asked host Steven Bartlett on a recent episode of The Diary of a CEO podcast. (The answer, according to his esteemed panel: nearly all of them). Dario Amodei of Anthropic famously warned in May that AI (and implicitly, AI agents) could wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs in the next one to five years. Heeding that siren call, corporate giants are embracing the AI agent future right now—like Ford’s partnership with an AI sales and service agent named “Jerry,” or Goldman Sachs “hiring” its AI software engineer, “Devin.” OpenAI’s Sam Altman, meanwhile, talks regularly about a possible billion-dollar company with just one human being involved. San Francisco is awash in startup founders with virtual employees, as nearly half of the companies in the spring class of Y Combinator are building their product around AI agents.

Hearing all this, I started to wonder: Was the AI employee age upon us already? And even, could I be the proprietor of Altman’s one-man unicorn? As it happens, I had some experience with agents, having created a bunch of AI agent voice clones of myself for the first season of my podcast, Shell Game.

I also have an entrepreneurial history, having once been the cofounder and CEO of the media and tech startup Atavist, backed by the likes of Andreessen Horowitz, Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, and Eric Schmidt’s Innovation Endeavors. The eponymous magazine we created is still thriving today. I wasn’t born to be a startup manager, however, and the tech side kind of fizzled out. But I’m told failure is the greatest teacher. So I figured, why not try again? Except this time, I’d take the AI boosters at their word, forgo pesky human hires, and embrace the all-AI employee future…

Eminently worth reading in full: “All of My Employees Are AI Agents, and So Are My Executives,” from @evrat.bsky.social in @wired.com.

Via Caitlin Dewey (@caitlindewey.bsky.social), whose tease/summary puts it plainly:

Ratliff, the undefeated king of tech journalism stunts, is back with another banger: For this piece and the accompanying podcast series, he created a start-up staffed entirely by so-called AI agents. The agents can communicate by email, Slack, text and phone, both with Ratliff and among themselves, and they have free range to complete tasks like writing code and searching the open internet. Despite their capabilities, however, the whole project’s a constant farce. A funny, stupid, telling farce that says quite a lot about the future of work that many technologists envision now…

Ronald Heifetz

###

As we analyze autonomy, we might we might spare a jaundiced thought for Trofim Denisovich Lysenko; he died on this date in 1976.  A Soviet biologist and agronomist, he believed the Mendelian theory of heredity to be wrong, and developed his own, allowing for “soft inheritance”– the heretability of learned behavior. (He believed that in one generation of a hybridized crop, the desired individual could be selected and mated again and continue to produce the same desired product, without worrying about separation/segregation in future breeds–he assumed that after a lifetime of developing (acquiring) the best set of traits to survive, those must be passed down to the next generation.)

In many way Lysenko’s theories recall Lamarck’s “organic evolution” and its concept of “soft evolution” (the passage of learned traits), though Lysenko denied any connection. He followed I. V. Michurin’s fanciful idea that plants could be forced to adapt to any environmental conditions, for example converting summer wheat to winter wheat by storing the seeds in ice.  With Stalin’s support for two decades, he actively obstructed the course of Soviet biology, caused the imprisonment and death of many of the country’s eminent biologists who disagreed with him, and imposed conditions that contributed to the disastrous decline of Soviet agriculture and the famines that resulted.

Interestingly, some current research suggests that heritable learning– or a semblance of it– may in fact be happening by virtue of epigenetics… though nothing vaguely resembling Lysenko’s theory.

 source

#agents #agriculture #ai #artificialIntelligence #business #companies #company #culture #genetics #history #lysenko #sovietUnion #stalin #technology

“Energy is liberated matter, matter is energy waiting to happen”*…

 

We’ve certainly come a long way since the ancient Greek atomists speculated about the nature of material substance, 2,500 years ago. But for much of this time we’ve held to the conviction that matter is a fundamental part of our physical universe. We’ve been convinced that it is matter that has energy. And, although matter may be reducible to microscopic constituents, for a long time we believed that these would still be recognizable as matter—they would still possess the primary quality of mass.

Modern physics teaches us something rather different, and deeply counter-intuitive. As we worked our way ever inward—matter into atoms, atoms into sub-atomic particles, sub-atomic particles into quantum fields and forces—we lost sight of matter completely. Matter lost its tangibility. It lost its primacy as mass became a secondary quality, the result of interactions between intangible quantum fields. What we recognize as mass is a behavior of these quantum fields; it is not a property that belongs or is necessarily intrinsic to them.

Despite the fact that our physical world is filled with hard and heavy things, it is instead the energy of quantum fields that reigns supreme. Mass becomes simply a physical manifestation of that energy, rather than the other way around…

Modern physics has taught us that mass is not an intrinsic property: “Physics Has Demoted Mass.”

* Bill Bryson, A Short History of Nearly Everything

###

As we watch all that is solid melt into air, we might spare a jaundiced thought for Trofim Denisovich Lysenko; he died on this date in 1976.  A Soviet biologist and agronomist, he believed the Mendelian theory of heredity to be wrong, and developed his own, allowing for “soft inheritance”– the heretability of learned behavior. (He believed that in one generation of a hybridized crop, the desired individual could be selected and mated again and continue to produce the same desired product, without worrying about separation/segregation in future breeds.–he assumed that after a lifetime of developing (acquiring) the best set of traits to survive, those must be passed down to the next generation.)

In many way Lysenko’s theories recall Lamarck’s “organic evolution” and its concept of “soft evolution” (the passage of learned traits), though Lysenko denied any connection. He followed I. V. Michurin’s fanciful idea that plants could be forced to adapt to any environmental conditions, for example converting summer wheat to winter wheat by storing the seeds in ice.  With Stalin’s support for two decades, he actively obstructed the course of Soviet biology and caused the imprisonment and death of many of the country’s eminent biologists who disagreed with him.

Interestingly, some current research suggests that heritable learning– or a semblance of it– may in fact be happening, by virtue of epigenetics… though nothing vaguely resembling Lysenko’s theory.


 source

 

#biology #genetics #history #lamarck #lysenko #mass #matter #physics #science #soviet

Physics Has Demoted Mass

Modern physics has taught us that mass is not an intrinsic property.

Nautilus

chief reporter #Ibrahim_Naber and cameraman #Viktor_Lysenko escaped with only minor injuries. #Lysenko captured the moment of the strike and the first minutes after it.

The filming group had the relevant markings on their clothes.

Deepest condolences to all victims of the attack.

https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article68fb9faa4b3870d4e74df29d/drohnenattacke-welt-reporter-bei-russischem-angriff-auf-ukrainische-soldaten-verletzt.html

#ukraine #putinisamasskiller #putinisawarcriminal @kardinal691

Drohnenattacke: WELT-Reporter bei russischem Angriff auf ukrainische Soldaten verletzt

Durch den massenweisen Einsatz von Drohnen hat sich nicht nur die Front in der Ukraine, sondern auch das Gebiet dahinter in eine Todeszone verwandelt. Immer wieder geraten auch Journalisten ins Visier. Während ihrer Arbeit in der Region Dnipro traf es nun auch ein Team von WELT.

WELT
Lysenko, Almaszi, Kosenko, Skoryk, Hawrylec, Stepovy and more from Warsaw - Schedule // - www.worldconcerthall.com

Olga Pasiecznik, soprano, Nazar Plyska, violin, and the Pomeranian Philharmonic Chamber Orchestra 'Capella Bydgostiensis' conducted by Roman Rewakowicz perform: Mykola LYSENKO: String Quartet in D minor (movements II and III, version for string orche...

Lysenko, Almaszi, Kosenko, Skoryk, Hawrylec, Stepovy and more from Warsaw - Schedule // - www.worldconcerthall.com

Olga Pasiecznik, soprano, Nazar Plyska, violin, and the Pomeranian Philharmonic Chamber Orchestra 'Capella Bydgostiensis' conducted by Roman Rewakowicz perform: Mykola LYSENKO: String Quartet in D minor (movements II and III, version for string orche...

Lysenko, Almaszi, Kosenko, Skoryk, Hawrylec, Stepovy and more from Warsaw - Schedule // - www.worldconcerthall.com

Olga Pasiecznik, soprano, Nazar Plyska, violin, and the Pomeranian Philharmonic Chamber Orchestra 'Capella Bydgostiensis' conducted by Roman Rewakowicz perform: Mykola LYSENKO: String Quartet in D minor (movements II and III, version for string orche...

The Pasieczniks perform Chopin, Szymanowski, Lysenko, Barwinski and Kosenko in Duszniki-Zdrój - Schedule // - www.worldconcerthall.com

International Chopin Festival in Duszniki-Zdrój. Olga Pasiecznik, soprano, and Natalia Pasiecznik, piano, perform: CHOPIN: Mazurkas, selection (arr. Pauline Viardot Garcia)/ Songs, Op. 74,selection. SZYMANOWSKI: Kurpie Songs, Op. 58, selection...

The Pasieczniks perform Chopin, Szymanowski, Lysenko, Barwinski and Kosenko in Duszniki-Zdrój - Schedule // - www.worldconcerthall.com

International Chopin Festival in Duszniki-Zdrój. Olga Pasiecznik, soprano, and Natalia Pasiecznik, piano, perform: CHOPIN: Mazurkas, selection (arr. Pauline Viardot Garcia)/ Songs, Op. 74,selection. SZYMANOWSKI: Kurpie Songs, Op. 58, selection...

The Pasieczniks perform Chopin, Szymanowski, Lysenko, Barwinski and Kosenko in Duszniki-Zdrój - Schedule // - www.worldconcerthall.com

International Chopin Festival in Duszniki-Zdrój. Olga Pasiecznik, soprano, and Natalia Pasiecznik, piano, perform: CHOPIN: Mazurkas, selection (arr. Pauline Viardot Garcia)/ Songs, Op. 74,selection. SZYMANOWSKI: Kurpie Songs, Op. 58, selection...

#Lysenko

"Lysenkoism: Permitting Ideology to Eclipse Reason

by Alister R. Olson, Michael P. Clough, and Benjamin C. Herman

This story highlights six tactics of science misinformation and disinformation efforts: the lack of competence among false experts, the creation of false legitimacy in order to fabricate a fake scientific controversy, cherry picking, putting forth conspiracy theories, avoiding peer review, and appeals directly to the public. See Features of Science Misinformation/Disinformation Efforts: Understand how to detect false information for more information regarding these tactics.

After the Russian Revolution ended in 1923, the newly formed Soviet government began to prioritize the sciences. Leading the Soviet genetics program was the esteemed geneticist Nikolai Vavilov. Vavilov was the winner of the Lenin Award, founder and head of the Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences (VASKhNIL) and the Institute of Plant Breeding (VIR), and member of the Collegium of the People’s Commissariat of Agriculture of the U.S.S.R. [1]. Under Vavilov, Soviet geneticists made significant advances, and the program was considered to be second only to the United States during the 1920s [2]. However, by 1948, Vavilov had been imprisoned, the Soviet genetics program had been completely dismantled, and millions within the Soviet Union were dead from starvation. Understanding the disintegration of the once vibrant Soviet research program has lessons for combatting the extensive misinformation and disinformation present in today’s world."

https://www.storybehindthescience.org/lysenkoism

Lysenkoism | Story Behind the Science

Story Behind Science