Civil Discourse â Two Days On The Hill: ICE & Pam Bondi â Joyce Vance
Civil Discourse with Joyce Vance
Two Days On The Hill: ICE & Pam Bondi
By Joyce Vance, Feb 11, 2026
Writing this newsletter isnât always easy. But it feels important to me, every day. If my work resonates with you and you want to support it, subscribing to Civil Discourse makes it possible for me to devote the time and resources it takes. Either way, Iâm grateful that youâre here. Democracy is a participatory sport, and none of us can sit on the sidelines right now. Being well educated about whatâs transpiring and sharing that knowledge with others is one of the most important things we can do.
Democrats in Congress are trying to get their branch of government to do its constitutional duty. As Congress continues to try and lumber to its feet, with just a few Republicans crossing over to work with Democrats on key issuesâthatâs how we got the Epstein Files Transparency Act in the first placeâthere is some good news to report.
Tuesday:
Asked if his agency had hired any pardoned January 6 defendants, ICEâs acting Director Todd Lyons was shockingly unprepared. He said he didnât have âthat informationâ in front of him but would get it.
Given how obvious it was that the question was coming, the lack of preparation seems deliberate. But Lyonsâ follow-on comment was intriguing: He said that ICE takes assaults on law enforcement seriously, and he doubted anyone who did that on Jan 6 could pass a background check. Apparently, ICE takes assaults on law enforcement more seriously than the President, who pardoned the January 6 defendants.
New York Congressman Dan Goldman, a former federal prosecutor and good friend, wasnât having any of the justifications and efforts to ignore, or at least walk past, whatâs been happening on the ground in Minneapolis and elsewhere.
âIf you donât want to be called a fascist regime or secret police, then stop acting like one.â
âItâs long past time that you rein in your out-of-control agency and start following the law and the Constitution.â
Goldman asked Lyons about the guidance agents are given about asking people walking on American streets to show proof of citizenship. Lyons claimed that his agents conduct âtargeted intelligence driven operations,â and that they âdonât walk around in the streets asking people about their American citizenship.â
Goldman was skeptical. âReally?â he responded. âSo all of those individual American citizens who have been randomly asked are lying? Is that what youâre saying?â
That exchange prompted the Congressman to ask Lyons if he knew what other 20th Century regimes required people to show proof of citizenship in similar circumstances. Lyons responded that he did. âSir, there has been various nefarious regimes that did that,â He told Goldman.
Goldman: Is Nazi Germany one?
Lyons: Yes. But Iâ
Goldman: Is the Soviet Union one?
Lyons: I-
Goldman: Iâm asking the questions. Is the Soviet Union one?
Lyons: Yes sir, but Iâm, Iâm totallyâŠthis is the wrong type of questioning.
Goldman: Iâll tell you what the wrong type of questioning. Reclaiming my time.
Lyons: Itâs not the men and women of ICE that are out there doing it every day. So to say that the men and women of ICE are Gestapos. Wrong.
After more back and forth, Goldman schooled the acting Director of ICE:
âThe problem is, you have it backwards sir. People are simply making valid observations about your tactics, which are un-American and outright fascist. So I have a simple suggestion. If you donât want to be called a fascist regime or secret police, then stop acting like one. People are simply just observing what they are seeing. And thatâs why people are making those comments.
âŠI was a prosecutor for ten years, prosecuted mob bosses, organized crime, violent criminals, the actual âworst of the worst.â Not a single criminal law enforcement agent that I worked with wore a mask to conceal their identity. But your department, which is a civil law enforcement agency, is defending the use of masks by your agents because of a so-called rise in threats and assaults against your officers.â
âŠNow, why is that a problem Mr. Lyons? Itâs a problem because the explanation that your agents are wearing masks because of fear of assaults or doxxing is outright bogus. You and your untrained, unqualified, unvetted, unidentified agents are intentionally terrorizing our cities and communities all over this country to avoid accountability for their excessive force and their lawless actions. That is why youâre wearing masks, so no one can hold you accountable and you know that the FBI is not going to because notwithstanding all the investigations all of you say are going on, the Department of Justice and the FBI has stated they are not investigating those two murders.
This is not the America I know and love. This is not the America my immigrant [family] came to and itâs long past time that you rein in your out-of-control agency and start following the law and the Constitution.â
There are some members of Congress who seem to have the knack for representing all of us, regardless of where we live. Dan Goldman is one of them.
Wednesday:
Today it was Pam Bondiâs turn. This was her first appearance before the House Judiciary Committee for an oversight hearing, which in and of itself tells you a lot about her respect for the Article I branch of government, 13 months into this administration. Bondi adopted a Trumpian persona, polite, sometimes veering into smarmy with Republicans; dismissive, rude, and downright insulting with Democrats.
But politicians signed up for this. Victims and survivors of horrific crimes didnât. Washington state Representative Pramila Jayapal was first up for Democrats, and she brought the Epstein survivors with her. She joined me for a Substack Live earlier this eveningâIâll post our full conversation where she explains what she did and how she views Bondiâs approach to the hearing later tonight when the video is ready.
One of Bondiâs lowest moments, besides her use of a âburn bookâ of insults that she hurled at Democratic members of Congress, was the response to questions about why she hasnât indicted anyone else who was involved in sex trafficking with Jeffrey Epstein. Her response? âThe Dow is over 50,000 dollars.â
A judge would strike a response like that during witness testimony in court as non-responsive. And certainly the AG isnât taking responsibility for the economy? Itâs just so classically Trumpian that it would be laughable except that, because of the context, it isnât. If you listen to her this bit, thereâs a moment where she takes a swipe at Marylandâs Jamie Raskin, saying, âI donât know why youâre laughing, I hear youâre a great stock trader, Raskin,â and then half swallowing a little chortle at her own cleverness, which came off to the room as intentional disrespect.
Early on, Bondi referred to herself as a career prosecutor. She said that she cares about victims and called Epstein âthat monster.â Then she urged victims to come forward. But the irony, and as a prosecutor who handled these kinds of cases, she has to know it, is that victims wonât come forward to talk with the FBI, having seen how Epstein victims are being treated. Asked to acknowledge them repeatedly in todayâs hearing, Bondi refused to apologize and arrange interviews with DOJ, something the survivors all signaled theyâve requested but have never been granted. She wouldnât even turn around to look them in the eyes, to acknowledge and respect their presence.
Bondi compounded it by saying, later, that victims whose names werenât redacted should contact DOJ to fix it. But their names & information shouldnât have been exposed in the first place. Itâs outrageous that Bondi thinks the burden should be on the survivors to let DOJ know it made a mistake and to get it fixed. DOJ is a massive, well-resourced law firm and it had a legal obligation to protect the victims. It was even provided with a list of names that needed to be redacted, and in some cases, they redacted one or a few, but not all of the victimsâ names. Itâs so careless that itâs hard to attribute it to mere negligence. Repeated errors of this magnitude, over time, take on the appearance of intentionality. And these are the kind of errors that make it clear to victims that if they come forward with information about the wrong people, their personal safety could be compromised.
Bondiâs Justice Department works for one client above all others, Donald Trump.
Editorâs Note: Read the rest of the story, at the below link.
Continue/Read Original Article Here: Two Days On The Hill: ICE & Pam Bondi
Tags:
Attorney General,
Civil Discourse,
Congress,
Democrats,
ICE,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),
Joyce Vance,
Pam Bondi,
Two Days on the Hill
#AttorneyGeneral #CivilDiscourse #Congress #Democrats #ICE #ImmigrationAndCustomsEnforcementICE #JoyceVance #PamBondi #TwoDaysOnTheHill