ICE killing in Minneapolis marks a dangerous new chapter for America – Las Vegas Sun News

January 31, 2026

EDITORIAL:

ICE killing in Minneapolis marks a dangerous new chapter for America

People gather near the scene where Alex Pretti was fatally shot by a U.S. Border Patrol officer yesterday, in Minneapolis, Sunday, Jan. 25, 2026. Photo by: Adam Gray / Associated Press

Friday, Jan. 30, 2026 | 2 a.m.

View more of the Sun’s opinion section

The killing of Alex Pretti on a Minneapolis street over the weekend should end any remaining illusions about where Donald Trump’s second-term presidency is headed. This was not an isolated tragedy, not a “confusing situation,” not the regrettable outcome of a tense encounter. The killings of Renee Nicole Good and Pretti in Minneapolis are an inflection point — the moment when the authoritarian impulses Trump has long telegraphed crossed fully from rhetoric into bloodshed.

Pretti was a 37-year-old ICU nurse who cared for veterans at the VA, and a concealed-carry license holder. He was standing in the street, exercising his constitutional rights to speak and assemble freely as part of a peaceful protest. He attempted to help a female protester get to her feet after she was thrown to the ground by federal agents.Within seconds, he was shot dead from behind, killed by his own government even though he posed no threat and was defenseless at the time.

Almost immediately, Trump administration officials rushed to the microphones to smear Pretti as a “domestic terrorist” and “would-be assassin.” But video evidence and even Customs and Border Protection’s own preliminary review reveal the lie being spread by Trump’s minions to manipulate the American people, distort the truth and consolidate power in Trump.

This pattern should be chillingly familiar. During his first campaign, Trump demonstrated that he was willing to violate the law and lie repeatedly to manipulate the public about his business acumen, his wealth and his relationships with everyone from Russian oligarchs to an adult film star.

Now, in his second term, the message is unmistakable: Laws, court orders, constitutional rights and even the lives of the American people, are expendable if they interfere with his pursuit of power and impunity.

Pretti’s killing did not happen in a vacuum. In January alone, at least eight people have died in encounters with federal immigration officials or while in ICE custody. In several of those cases, eyewitness accounts and recordings directly contradict the official narratives issued by the administration. At least two of the dead were U.S. citizens who asked only to exercise their constitutional rights to move, assemble and speak freely; to lawfully carry a firearm; and, if accused of wrongdoing, to receive due process.

Instead, they were met with what can only be described as summary executions by a federal force that increasingly resembles a private army loyal to Trump alone.

Moreover, the Trump administration has shown an alarming comfort with lying about the circumstances surrounding the death of Americans at the hands of ICE.

Consider the facts in Pretti’s case. The Department of Homeland Security initially claimed he “approached officers with a 9 mm semiautomatic handgun,” neglecting to mention that the weapon was holstered and he never reached for it. The government’s own preliminary review concedes there was no brandishing — only a refusal to move while filming agents, followed by an attempt to help a woman up, then being swarmed by federal agents and then gunfire. In fact, it was federal agents who removed Pretti’s gun from its holster prior to shooting the unarmed and incapacitated man multiple times in the back, ending his life.

The same script played out earlier this month with the killing of Good, a Minneapolis mother of three shot in her car by a federal agent. Her last words to the man who killed her as she tried to drive away from the scene: “That’s fine, dude. I’m not mad at you.” Hardly the sentiments of a terrorist.

She, too, was instantly labeled a “violent rioter” and “domestic terrorist.” Trump himself claimed she ran over an officer. Video evidence shows that she had the wheels of her car turned away from the federal agent who shot her, undermining the administration’s certainty and raising profound questions about the use of lethal force.

And then there is the death of Geraldo Lunas Campos, a Cuban immigrant who died in ICE custody in El Paso, Texas. ICE claimed suicide. A witness described a chokehold. An autopsy found injuries consistent with a chokehold and potentially with homicide. Once again, the official story collapses under scrutiny.

Trump administration officials have suggested that because Pretti carried a holstered weapon and filmed agents, that his killing was “legally justified.” By this standard, law enforcement should have opened fire on the thousands of Jan. 6 attackers who killed and maimed Capitol police, or Kyle Rittenhouse, or the armed militiamen who invaded the Michigan statehouse, or the armed demonstrators intimidating voters in Arizona.

For those who voted for Trump, take note. The danger that was once reserved for immigrants, people of color or LGBTQ Americans is now at your doorstep. This is not Barack Obama or Joe Biden ordering masked federal agents into the streets without training. It is not a Democratic administration asserting that it is “legally justified” for the federal government to shoot anyone who lawfully carries a gun near a protest. It is Donald Trump and the Republican Party, which controls every branch of the federal government.

Nor should we forget that as Trump proclaims support for the protesters in Iran and says the state shouldn’t kill them, his administration is killing protesters in the U.S. because they oppose his policies.

Worse still, as conservative commentator Joe Rogan pointed out last week, it appears that one of Trump’s primary motivations for sending ICE into the streets is simply to distract from an even larger national scandal: the Epstein files.

Despite a federal law mandating the release of the files by Dec. 19, Trump’s Justice Department has released only about 1% of the files thus far. At its current pace, the department won’t release all the files until 2030.

Last week, Rogan implied that ICE’s massive ongoing operations are designed to distract from Trump’s potential involvement in a child-sex trafficking ring. It’s an immigration crackdown weaponized to divert attention from one of the few scandals that could stand in the way of Trump’s authoritarian ambitions.

We don’t know if Rogan is correct or not, because like everyone else, we haven’t seen the files. What we do know is that regardless of the motivation, Trump and his minions are trashing the Constitution and killing American citizens with no cause or legitimate justification.

Authoritarianism does not arrive all at once. It advances in steps, each normalized by fear, propaganda and the vilification of the dead. The killings in Minneapolis mark the moment when the line was crossed, when the erosion of rights turned unmistakably lethal. If Americans do not recognize them as such, the next inflection point may come even closer to home.

Continue/Read Original Article Here: ICE killing in Minneapolis marks a dangerous new chapter for America – Las Vegas Sun News

#AlexJeffreyPretti #America #Authoritarian #Authoritarianism #Bloodshed #BorderPatrol #DHS #Editorial #EpsteinFiles #Fear #ICE #ImmigrationAndCustomsEnforcementICE #InflectionPoint #January312026 #JoeRogan #Killing #LasVegasSun #LasVegasSunNews #Minneapolis #PrivateArmy #Propaganda #Trump #USDepartmentOfHomelandSecurity

@ZLabe Why is climate data; for ocean warming, catastrophic hurricanes and typhoons, wild fires, pollution, accelerated extinctions and ecosystems collapse failing to affect enough cultural changes to avoid raising the chance of biosphere collapse?

Clearly the extraction, processing, production and consumer excess depends on the unsustainable growth of non-renewable theft from poorer and less well-armed Nations. That being said, it appears extinction is coded into the DNA of those that are elected to lead us and are financed by oligarchs, despots, plutocrats and theocrats. Hydra’s heads just grow back, so the people must be prepared to fight for and defend an ethically sustainable morality so they cannot grow back. Either that or resign themselves to the consequences of Empire’s celebrity death cults! #MAD #EmpiresEcocide #InflectionPoint #DefeatingEmpires #TheFederation #DRDI #Sovereignty #Freedom

And so it begins! May every fecking race in this nation follow its lead #elections #inflectionpoint #NoKings #vagov

https://apple.news/AKFouuA8WQTiXXY6aErr7bw

Democrat Abigail Spanberger to become Virginia’s first female governor – live — Guardian US

The Associated Press projects Democrat Abigail Spanberger has won the Virginia governor’s race, defeating Republican Winsome Earle-Sears

President Lee Says 'World Order at a Major Inflection Point Amid Intensifying Global Economic Uncertainty'

President Lee warns that the global order is undergoing a major shift, with economic uncertainty deepening worldwide.

Yonhap Infomax
Inflection Points: A Transformational Guide to Living and Working with Purpose
In a world where busyness often masquerades as progress, Matt Spielman’s Inflection Points: How to Work and Live with Purpose offers a refreshing, actionable roadmap for reclaiming intentionality, fulfillment, and clarity. This isn’t just another self-help book—it’s a strategic life... More details… https://spiritualkhazaana.com/inflection-points-living-with-purpose/
#inflectionpoint #inflectionpoints #whatisaninflectionpoint #whatisapointofinflection

We're at an inflection point in the world of software development—a moment in time when the impact of AI on the job market is no longer speculative, but tangible. The rapid evolution of AI-powered coding tools, particularly models like OpenAI's latest releases, is reshaping how we think about programming. And it's not just about speeding up workflow anymore; it's about the fundamental nature of what programming jobs entail and who is qualified to do them.

Recently, I came across an interesting perspective from the YouTube channel "Internet of Bugs," which has been notably skeptical about AI's ability to replace programmers. Statements like "AI can't replace developers," "automated programming doesn't work," and "it produces non-functional code" were frequent claims. However, this viewpoint has started to shift—not necessarily because AI is suddenly perfect, but because it has crossed a critical threshold in capability.

With the latest version of OpenAI's models the skepticism about AI's usefulness in real-world programming scenarios seems to be fading. The reason? O1 is now proficient enough to handle entry-level programming tasks. These are tasks that might not require extensive creativity or deep problem-solving, but they are often the starting point for many junior developers. If O1 can do these tasks just as well, or sometimes make the same beginner mistakes as a human junior developer, companies might start reconsidering whether they need as many entry-level programmers.

The trajectory doesn't end there. The concern raised in the video—and one that I find crucial—is that with continued rapid iteration, the next version, let's call it O2 (pun intended), might bring us even closer to a point where mid-range developers are also at risk of being replaced. Right now, experienced programmers are still clearly more capable than AI, particularly in areas that require creative problem-solving, intricate system design, or debugging complex issues. But for how long will this edge last?

We have to consider the timeline here. What we're seeing now is essentially AI that represents capabilities from late 2023. Behind closed doors, it's very likely that OpenAI and other companies are already working on more advanced versions, ones that we might see publicly within the next year. If this pace continues, we could reach a situation where, step by step, AI makes certain levels of programming jobs redundant—starting from the most routine tasks and moving up the complexity ladder.

The implication is clear: for junior developers, the job landscape is changing fast. AI can now do many of the tasks that used to be considered as the entry point into the world of programming. And this is not just about theory anymore—it's something that's happening, potentially pushing us towards what many believe is the 2024 inflection point. The year when AI isn't just a tool for helping developers, but one that might start taking their jobs.

Adapting to the Change

So, where does this leave developers? As we stand at this inflection point, the answer seems to be adaptation. Developers need to go beyond the basics—the kind of coding tasks that AI can easily automate—and start focusing on skills that are harder for AI to replicate. Skills like understanding the broader context of a project, system architecture, creative problem-solving, and empathy-driven user experience design. These are areas where human judgment still plays a critical role.

Moreover, the rise of AI tools can be seen as an opportunity rather than just a threat. By embracing these tools, developers can offload repetitive work, freeing up time to tackle more challenging and rewarding aspects of software development. It might be about learning to work alongside AI rather than competing with it—making AI an extension of one's abilities rather than viewing it as a rival.

The "Internet of Bugs" skepticism captures a sentiment shared by many: the belief that AI isn't capable enough to replace humans, that automated code will always fall short. But this stance is evolving as the technology evolves. As we see the capabilities of AI improve with each iteration, we must also recognize the change in the type of tasks AI can perform, and how that alters the very foundation of what it means to be a developer.

2024 might very well be the year that marks an inflection point for developers. Whether this change is for better or worse depends largely on how well we adapt, how well we pivot our skills, and how we integrate these new tools into our daily work. One thing is for certain: we're at an inflection point, and the pace of change is only accelerating.

Unlock the Future of Business with AI

Dive into our immersive workshops and equip your team with the tools and knowledge to lead in the AI era.

Get in touch with us

https://www.ikangai.com/the-inflection-point-how-ai-is-redefining-programming-careers/

#AI #f22938 #InflectionPoint #Programming

AI and Jobs: Has the Inflection Point Arrived? Evidence from an Online Labor Platform

This study investigates how artificial intelligence (AI) influences various online labor markets (OLMs) over time. Employing the Difference-in-Differences method, we discovered two distinct scenarios following ChatGPT's launch: displacement effects featuring reduced work volume and earnings, exemplified by translation & localization OLM; productivity effects featuring increased work volume and earnings, exemplified by web development OLM. To understand these opposite effects in a unified framework, we developed a Cournot competition model to identify an inflection point for each market. Before this point, human workers benefit from AI enhancements; beyond this point, human workers would be replaced. Further analyzing the progression from ChatGPT 3.5 to 4.0, we found three effect scenarios, reinforcing our inflection point conjecture. Heterogeneous analyses reveal that U.S. web developers tend to benefit more from ChatGPT's launch compared to their counterparts in other regions. Experienced translators seem more likely to exit the market than less experienced translators.

arXiv.org
Charted: When Will the Global Population Start to Shrink?

A global population inflection point is closer than we think. The latest UN estimates say 2084 could be a crucial year.

Visual Capitalist
Charted: When Will the Global Population Start to Shrink?

A global population inflection point is closer than we think. The latest UN estimates say 2084 could be a crucial year.

Visual Capitalist