US citizens and concerned others should pay attention to this segment from the Rachel Maddow show on MSNBC:
The story tries to make sense of the fact that Trump has repeatedly remarked in an ominous way that he's not too concerned about whether people vote, as if the plan is to win the election not on votes but court challenges.
She's drawing on this excellent reporting from Rolling Stone:
From that article:
«“I think we are going to see mass refusals to certify the election” in November, says Democratic election lawyer Marc Elias. “Everything we are seeing about this election is that the other side is more organized, more ruthless, and more prepared.”»
I don't even know why anyone at MSNBC is surprised. I've been worried for now a couple of years that this was going to happen and it was because of reporting MSNBC and others did even back then, saying that the groundwork for this was being laid. That we have taken this long to recognize the threat is distressing.
If Biden does not have a task force in place to counter this threat, he needs to make one.
As I noted in my July 5 blog post Supreme Challenge (https://netsettlement.blogspot.com/2024/07/supreme-challenge.html), before Biden passed the baton to Harris, Biden now has considerable power he's opting not to use but must reconsider using to assure fair elections.
He could, for example, order DOJ to charge every one of these people who are conspiring in advance and without foundation to challenge an election with seditious conspiracy. Such powers, SCOTUS tells us, are absolute and not subject to legal review. Probably there are other actions he could take, too.
My more general point is that we don't have to sit idle and watch misdeeds play out as if there is nothing to be done. Certainly if Trump is elected, HE will use those same powers in exactly the same way but without foundation, hesitation, or remorse, and without the health of our democracy as his goal.
As noted by Marc Elias in the quote above, these guys are not kidding around, they are playing for keeps. The Dems better treat this as the serious threat it is. I'd say the GOP should likewise care, but they're in a hypnotic trance, operating in mindless lockstep, so it's up to those not under the spell to act.
Maybe, too, Kamala can see what Joe might not and use her newfound clout to get him to take the gloves off.
#politics #USPolitics #democracy #Election2024 #kamala #KamalaHarris #biden #ElectionInterference #ElectionDeniers #ElectionMeddling #ElectionChallenges #SeditiousConspiracy
EDIT: I mirrored this essay on my blog at Blogspot in slightly prettier form for those who might want a better external reference:
https://netsettlement.blogspot.com/2024/07/conspiring-to-contest-elections.html
Rachel Maddow rounds up instances in which Donald Trump not only assures his supporters that if he is elected they won't have to vote in the future, but also that even for this 2024 election he does not need votes. Maddow posits that the reason Trump doesn't care about votes is that he intends to win by manipulating the administration of the voting tabulation.
Colorado judge strikes down Trump's attempt to toss a lawsuit seeking to bar him from the ballot
#ColoradoJudge #TrumpLawsuit #BallotBan #ElectionChallenges #LegalRuling #14thAmendment #Politics #News
A Colorado judge has rejected an attempt by former President Donald Trump to dismiss a lawsuit that seeks to keep him off the state ballot. The lawsuit claims the U.S. Constitution's ban on those who have “engaged in insurrection” from holding office applies to Trump, citing his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Trump’s attorneys argued the case should be dismissed because of a Colorado law that protects people from lawsuits abridging their free speech rights. State District Judge Sarah Wallace ruled that the law doesn't apply in this case.
Headlines Africa
Kent Pitman
U.S. Politics in Real Time
Queer Lit Cats