The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Ruling Is Results-Driven Cynicism, Not Law

I will continue to make the case for a 100 Justice Supreme Court because we need to get to the point that no single Supreme Court Justice matters. As it stands, each individual Justice has way too …

Techdirt

Republicans in Congress, 1868: All are equal under the law!

Republicans in Congress, 2026: Just kidding

#Amerika #impeach47 #resist #donotcomply #crushICE #VRA #CRA #AmendmentXIV #14thAmendment

The 14th was paid for in the blood of good men
The 14th was paid for in the blood of good men

Americans aren't down with Trump and the Republicans destroying the U.S. Constitution one amendment at a time.

#14thAmendment

Read about it here: https://thegodlessliberal.blogspot.com/2026/04/a-majority-of-americans-opposes-trumps.html

A Majority Of Americans Opposes Trump's Efforts To End Birthright Citizenship (CHART)

A majority of Americans believe children born in the United States should be automatically granted ​U.S. citizenship, according to a Reuters...

Back when the federal government briefly had the balls to tackle #WhiteSupremacist #terrorism, in 1871 on #ThisDayInHistory Pres. #UlyssesSGrant signed the #KuKluxKlanAct, allowing for federal enforcement of the #14thAmendment. After Grant, the US gov. let the #racists run wild.
Nevada Court Latest To Say Mandatory Detention Of Migrants Is Illegal

More of the same for the Trump administration — one that seems incapable of achieving its goals without breaking the law or disregarding the Constitution. Hundreds of judges handling thousand…

Techdirt
Constitutional consistency check:
→ 14th Amendment: originalists say it can’t be applied beyond its 1868 context
→ 2nd Amendment: same originalists apply it to weapons that didn’t exist for 150 years after ratification
This isn’t jurisprudence. It’s motivated reasoning with a pocket Constitution.
#Originalism #Constitution #GunPolicy #14thAmendment
The Supreme Court Absolutely Shredded Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Case

But this also begs the question: why is this facially unconstitutional case before the court in the first place?

The Nation