"This paper traces the history of the IPCC’s use of DMDU [decision making under deep uncertainty] and explains the intersection with key IPCC concepts such as risk, scenarios, treatment of uncertainty, storylines and high-impact, low-likelihood outcomes, and both adaptation and climate resilient development pathways. The paper suggests how the IPCC might benefit from enhanced use of DMDU in its current (7th) assessment cycle."

#DMDU
#ScientificUncertainty

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2024.1380054/full

The use of decision making under deep uncertainty in the IPCC

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) exists to provide policy-relevant assessments of the science related to climate change. As such, the IPCC has long grappled with characterizing and communicating uncertainty in its assessments. Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU) is a set of concepts, methods, and tools to inform decisions when there exist substantial and significant limitations on what is and can be known about policy-relevant questions. Over the last twenty-five years, the IPCC has drawn increasingly on DMDU concepts to more effectively include policy-relevant, but lower-confidence scientific information in its assessments. This paper traces the history of the IPCC’s use of DMDU and explains the intersection with key IPCC concepts such as risk, scenarios, treatment of uncertainty, storylines and high-impact, low-likelihood outcomes, and both adaptation and climate resilient development pathways. The paper suggests how the IPCC might benefit from enhanced use of DMDU in its current (7th) assessment cycle.

Frontiers

In a new paper published in Earth’s Future, Klaus Keller (Dartmouth, formerly PSU) and I try to link the exploratory-modeling, robustness-centric #DMDU philosophy back to probabilistic models.

Using formal probability models has many advantages. For example, we can deliberately over-sample low-probability regions of the parameter space without distorting our estimates. We can also use simulation-visualization techniques to explore the implications of our (inevitably flawed) assumptions.

Many classical approaches to climate risk management have used excessively narrow estimates of future risk (sup 👋 bulletin 17C) as a basis for “objective” cost-benefit analyses and the like.

A growing literature on decision making under deep uncertainty (#DMDU) rightly rejects this, instead emphasizing methods that identify plans that perform well over many possible futures.

Everyone these days should bone up on the philosophy and methods of #DMDU - the Society for Decision Making Under @deepuncertainty. As an appetizer here's audio of my #sustainwhat webcast with some of the leaders in this field: https://revkin.substack.com/p/paths-to-progress-facing-enduring-32f#details
---
RT @apoorva_nyc
For nearly three years, we've lived through a time of staggering uncertainty. On Dec 6 at 1 pm ET, @revkin Kate Swe…
https://twitter.com/apoorva_nyc/status/1594812036789448705
Paths to Progress Facing Enduring Deep Uncertainty

Listen now (70 min) | Original Air Date: November 11, 2020 Too often, politicians and the rest of us choose to wait for clarity before tackling tough, consequential, challenges. News media cover disastrous events far better than underlying drivers of risk - or resilience.

Sustain What

Hi! I study water resource systems challenges with focuses on integrated human-natural systems modeling, decision making under #DeepUncertainty, multi-objective optimization.

Lately, I’ve been exploring ML methods for streamflow predictions in ungauged basins.

You can visit my site (which is a bit of a WIP at the moment): https://trevoramestoy.com//

I post frequently on the blog: https://waterprogramming.wordpress.com

Hoping to find some community here!
#introduction #DMDU #hydrology

About me:

About me

Trevor Amestoy