Stephen Thaler’s Legendary AI Copyright Losing Streak Ends With Nowhere Left To Appeal

We’ve been covering Stephen Thaler’s quixotic quest to get copyright (and patent) protection for works generated entirely by his AI system “DABUS” for years now. If there&#8…

Techdirt
The Machine Cannot Own What It Creates: America's Highest Court Slams the Door on AI Copyright

The US Supreme Court declined to hear the DABUS AI copyright case, leaving human authorship as a legal requirement. Here's what it means for Australia.

The Daily Perspective

https://www.slashinsider.com/dabus-patent-case-uk-supreme-court/

The UK Supreme Court upholds decisions rejecting the recognition of AI, #Dabus, as an inventor in a patent application. The ruling asserts that an inventor must be a person. While concerns about #AI-generated inventions persist, the court highlights the need for potential future legal changes at an international level.

#tech #technology #technews #slashinsider #latest #latestnews #emergingtech #deeptech #news #artificialintelligence #UKnews #dabus

Artificial Minds Denied (Dabus): UK Supreme Court Says AI Cannot Hold Patents

The UK Supreme Court upholds decisions rejecting the recognition of AI, Dabus, as an inventor in a patent application. The ruling asserts that an inventor must be a person. While concerns about AI-generated inventions persist, the court highlights the need for potential future legal changes at an international level.

Slash Insider
KI ist kein Erfinder - Entscheidung am Obersten Gerichtshof in UK - KINEWS24.de

KI ist kein Erfinder - Entscheidung am Obersten Gerichtshof in UK

KI NEWS24

#FakeIntelligence cannot be #patent #inventor

Stephen #Thaler, a #US computer scientist, lost his bid to register patents over inventions created by his #AI system in a landmark case in #Britain.

The dubious inventions were devised by his "creativity machine" called #DABUS

Thaler appealed to UK's Supreme Court, which unanimously rejected it, as under UK patent law "an inventor must be a natural person".

It doesn't preclude a PERSON using AI to devise an invention.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/ai-cannot-be-patent-inventor-uk-supreme-court-rules-landmark-case-2023-12-20/

Three technical reasons why DABUS wasn't the sole inventor of the patents filed in its name #AI #DABUS #inventor #patent @[email protected] https://rdcu.be/c1bjR

#KnowledgeShare The latest on the #DABUS Thaler litigation. The question of whether an #AI machine can be named as an inventor of a #patent has reached the end of the road in Australia 🇦🇺 . Over to the 🇬🇧 UK Supreme Court who will hear the appeal in March 2022.

https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/australian-high-court-pulls-plug-on-landmark-dabus-ai-patent-application

Australian High Court pulls plug on landmark DABUS AI patent application

The question of whether an AI machine can be named as an inventor of a patent has reached the end of the road before the courts in Australia.

Pinsent Masons

On 2 March the UK Supreme Court will hear the appeal of the Thaler #AI invenstorship case.

Following the Australian Federal Court’s dismissal of the application to appeal there, the UKSC will be the highest court to look at the issue and decide the fate of the #DABUS #patents.

What happened at the Court of Appeal can be read here - https://www.scl.org/articles/12378-ai-as-an-inventor-not-yet-in-the-uk-rules-court-of-appeal

AI as an inventor? Not (yet) in the UK, rules Court of Appeal

Mark Marfé and Sarah Taylor summarise and comment on the recent Court of Appeal on whether an AI can own or transfer patent rights

DABUS: Sollten KI-Werke gesetzlich geschützt werden können?

Weltweit befassen sich aktuell Gerichte mit der Frage, ob sich eine KI, wie DABUS, als Erfinder eines Patents qualifizieren kann.

Tarnkappe.info
DABUS: Sollten KI-Werke gesetzlich geschützt werden können?

Weltweit befassen sich aktuell Gerichte mit der Frage, ob sich eine KI, wie DABUS, als Erfinder eines Patents qualifizieren kann.

Tarnkappe.info