Mastodawn

Friends of mine started a mobility podcast where they interview experts from academia. Give them a try!

🎙️🚆🚲🏙️
In the newest podcast episode from Mobility Club, we talk about how mobility data can shape real-world decisions, prompted by Robin’s Propensity to Cycle Tool (PCT), an open platform that helps cities understand cycling potential and plan better networks. We discuss what it takes to build tools that are not only open but truly usable, how researchers should use AI responsibly, and why simpler models can sometimes lead to better policy choices: https://rss.com/podcasts/mobility-club/2576894

🔁 Please repost :)

#Podcast #UrbanMobility #UrbanTransition #Mobility #Cycling #Fahrrad #Radkultur #CyclingScience #MobilityScience

Cycle Review News Mar 4, 2025

Breathing Sensors in Bike Racing: Visma’s Game-Changer or Just Hype?

...#BreathingSensors #TourDeFrance #ParisRoubaix #VismaLeaseABike #JonasVingegaard #WoutVanAert #CyclingTech #Tymewear #VentilationMetrics #VT1VT2 #CyclingInnovation #ProCycling #SufferOMeter #CyclingData #VitalProLaunch #WorldTourTech #CyclingScience #TrainingMetrics #UCIInvestigation #NextGenCycling #PerformanceTech #CyclingRevolution #LabLevelInsights #BreathRateSensors #CyclingBreakthrough…

https://cyclereview.co.uk/breathing-sensors-in-bike-racing-vismas-game-changer-or-just-hype/

Breathing Sensors in Bike Racing: Visma's Game-Changer or Just Hype?

Cycle Review

Cycle Review News Feb 28, 2025

Breath of Controversy: UCI Mulls Ban on Transformational Breathing Sensors in Pro Cycling

...#UCI #BreathSensors #CyclingTech #VentilationMonitors #MetabolicOutput #TrainingTech #RacingInnovation #PhysiologicalData #CyclingGear #AthleteTech #WearableTech #CyclingScience #SportsTech #WorldTour #CyclingRegulations Source link The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) is reportedly considering a ban on the in-competition use of groundbreaking breathing sensors that provide…

https://cyclereview.co.uk/breath-of-controversy-uci-mulls-ban-on-transformational-breathing-sensors-in-pro-cycling/

Breath of Controversy: UCI Mulls Ban on Transformational Breathing Sensors in Pro Cycling

Cycle Review

David Isaac Nov 18, 2022

This study from Canada showed that investments in cycling infrastructure that cause even a tiny increase in cycling mode share save lives, reduce carbon emissions, and have a financial benefit worth millions of dollars. Building bike lanes is fiscally responsible (despite what some people think).

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0246419

#CyclingScience

An economic analysis of the health-related benefits associated with bicycle infrastructure investment in three Canadian cities

Objectives Decision-makers are increasingly requesting economic analyses on transportation-related interventions, but health is often excluded as a determinant of value. We assess the health-related economic impact of bicycle infrastructure investments in three Canadian cities (Victoria, Kelowna and Halifax), comparing a baseline reference year (2016) with the future infrastructure build-out (2020). Methods The World Health Organization’s Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT; version 4.2) was used to quantify the economic value of health benefits associated with increased bicycling, using a 10-year time horizon. Outputs comprise premature deaths prevented, carbon emissions avoided, and a benefit:cost ratio. For 2016–2020, we derived cost estimates for bicycle infrastructure investments (including verification from city partners) and modelled three scenarios for changes in bicycling mode share: ‘no change’, ‘moderate change’ (a 2% increase), and ‘major change’ (a 5% increase). Further sensitivity analyses (32 per city) examined how robust the moderate scenario findings were to variation in parameter inputs. Results Planned bicycle infrastructure investments between 2016 and 2020 ranged from $28–69 million (CAD; in 2016 prices). The moderate scenario benefit:cost ratios were between 1.7:1 (Victoria) and 2.1:1 (Halifax), with the benefit estimate incorporating 9–18 premature deaths prevented and a reduction of 87–142 thousand tonnes of carbon over the 10-year time horizon. The major scenario benefit:cost ratios were between 3.9:1 (Victoria) and 4.9:1 (Halifax), with 19–43 premature deaths prevented and 209–349 thousand tonnes of carbon averted. Sensitivity analyses showed the ratio estimates to be sensitive to the time horizon, investment cost and value of a statistical life inputs. Conclusion Within the assessment framework permitted by HEAT, the dollar value of health-related benefits exceeded the cost of planned infrastructure investments in bicycling in the three study cities. Depending on the decision problem, complementary analyses may be required to address broader questions relevant to decision makers in the public sector.