Eww, #WorkAdventure is licensed under #CommonsClause (put on top of AGPL), which makes it non-free software in total. https://github.com/thecodingmachine/workadventure/issues/523
That really is unfortunate.
@KarlHeinzHasliP
> workadventu.re is the best matrix front end
This does look cool. Code is under AGPLv3, but they seem to think they can simultaneously give full permission for reuse *and* revoke some of those uses;
https://workadventu.re/faq/what-is-the-license-of-the-self-hosted-version-of-workadventure/
The Commons Clause is a dead duck legally when apply to v3 GNU licenses, so feel free to ignore it;

The self-hosted version of WorkAdventure is distributed under the AGPL v3 license modified by the Commons Clause. It means the source code is available (on Github). Because it is based on the AGPL license, you can freely: Use the software as you wish Change the software as you wish If you redistribute the software or […]
Because the #GPL #License text is added to the top and the #CommonsClause is added afterwards #github considers the project #GPLv3 software.
I’m amazed GitHub doesn’t have better licensing monitoring tools. This makes automated license tracking pretty iffy in my book.
The #CommonsClause pollutes the #FOSS #commons. It creates new hazards for software users to navigate.
It's /especially/ confusing when nonsensically combined with a #GPL family license like #AGPLv3.
#FreeSoftware #OpenSource
https://github.com/thecodingmachine/workadventure/issues/2317
One that comes to mind is FOSSA. They're a venture capital backed startup that offers "Audit-Grade Open Source Dependency Protection".
They also are the originators of the "#CommonsClause" #OpenSource license rider that adds confusing restrictions that make software no longer Open Source.
https://commonsclause.com/
Eww, #WorkAdventure is licensed under #CommonsClause (put on top of AGPL), which makes it non-free software in total. https://github.com/thecodingmachine/workadventure/issues/523
That really is unfortunate.
We need to talk licenses. Recently discovered #commonsclause through the #n8n project (big fan). I'm quite ideological but I really dig the pragmatism behind this license. The code is still #opensource, accessible and extendible. That's what I want from a product I need to trust. If the owner wants my contributions but doesn't want me making money from it… I understand that! Yet I read a lot of criticism about this license.
What am I not seeing?