I was reading the chapter "A Völva or Seiðmaðr in Finland? Cultural Creolization as a Problem for Interpretations" by Anna Wessman, Frog, and Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson in the book Gendering the Nordic Past: Dialogues between Perspectives (Brepols 2025, p. 121–35).
Imagine my steppe warrior fan fiction drenched surprise when I read the following description of some findings in a 700 AD elite boat burial in southern Ostrobothnia:
"Of the three belt buckles found in the burial one is of eastern origin, probably deriving from the Avarian areas of Hungary or Ukraine."
So cool! Unfortunately, there were no illustrations of this belt buckle, and I failed to find it in Finna.fi (probably just my own incompetence, will try again later).
The Avars arrived in Europe from North-East Asia in the mid-500s AD and established a khaganate in the region of modern-day Hungary, Serbia, Austria and Ukraine that endured until the 800s. They left many elaborately decorated belt sets in their own burials, which makes their style easily recognizable. But how did this belt buckle end up in Finland?
The burial was unearthed in Pukkila, Isokyrö, Finland, and described as "one of the last elaborate burials during the Merovingian period" in the region; a "Scandinavian-type burial" situated in a cemetery context "often associated with Finnic language areas but in a region where the closest genetic matches are not too distant to the modern Sami" (see genetic evidence from the Levänluhta lake burials).
The chapter is available here: https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1961525&dswid=-8292
(It's a bit funny that the belt buckle found in Finland is characterized as "eastern", when the longitude of southern Ostrobothnia is clearly to the east of most of the Avar-ruled territory. "Southern" would be a more accurate geographical description. Of course, the use of "eastern" is cultural here, not geographical.)
#avars #archaeology #occidocentrism