Ah, #CERN, because what we truly need is a particle collider for publishing papers, right? 🤓🔬 Forget building black holes, they're now into inciting academic black holes with open access publishing. 🚀📚 Too bad their platform can't accelerate the speed of peer review! 🐢💨
https://home.cern/news/news/cern/cern-host-europes-flagship-open-access-publishing-platform #openaccess #particlecollider #peerreview #academicpublishing #sciencehumor #HackerNews #ngated
CERN to host Europe’s flagship open access publishing platform

In an important step for open science, CERN has been selected to host a new phase of Open Research Europe (ORE), an initiative supported by the European Commission and a new funding consortium of European national funding agencies and research organisations. Aligned with the Action Plan for Diamond Open Access (2022)[1], the initiative is a community-led alternative to traditional academic publishing. When the new ORE platform is launched later this year, authorship eligibility will be expanded to include researchers affiliated with institutions in the countries that participate in the consortium. Publishing will remain completely free for both European Commission-funded researchers and authors from participating countries. The aim is to promote equity, diversity and transparency in scholarly communication while maintaining high standards of quality and integrity. The ORE funding consortium currently comprises members from Austria, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland[2]. The European Commission participates as a permanent observer in the governance body and provides dedicated financial support. CERN will provide the technical and operational infrastructure for the platform, built on the open source software Open Journal Systems (OJS), while governance and editorial oversight will remain the responsibility of the ORE consortium. ORE follows the innovative publish–review–curate model, which promotes rigour and transparency in the publishing of research. Articles are first checked for integrity and compliance, then published and peer-reviewed openly. Peer-review reports are made public, and articles that successfully pass review are curated into subject-specific collections. This approach combines quality assurance with openness, while also enabling post-publication review. Launched by the European Commission in 2021 to provide beneficiaries of EU research programmes with a no-fee open access publishing platform[3], ORE was designed to make publicly funded research more transparent, accessible and sustainable through an innovative publishing model. In the five years since its launch, the platform has seen steady growth and uptake across the research community, with more than 1,200 articles published and over 6,300 authors from more than 3,000 institutions worldwide taking part. CERN’s role in operating ORE builds on its long-standing experience in developing and maintaining open science infrastructures and community-governed services for the global research community. By hosting ORE, CERN will provide a neutral, reliable and sustainable environment, drawing on expertise gained through flagship open science initiatives such as Zenodo, Invenio and SCOAP3. “For CERN, hosting Open Research Europe is a natural extension of our commitment to an open, community-led scientific infrastructure,” said Mar Capeáns, CERN Director for Site Operations. “The platform supports the rapid sharing of research, while reinforcing Europe’s ability to shape the future of scholarly communication.” “Open Research Europe is a strong example of a shared commitment to fostering the free flow of knowledge across the European Research Area and beyond”, stated Marc Lemaître, Director-General for Research and Innovation (DG RTD), European Commission. “By ensuring open access to high-quality research, ORE facilitates the circulation of the latest research findings and amplifies public trust in science. Today, as European research funders and research organisations join forces to support ORE, we open a new chapter, one that strengthens open access scholarly publishing and improves research practices across Europe”. Beyond the technical infrastructure, the initiative is expected to deepen collaboration between CERN, the European Commission, national representatives and research organisations. Working in partnership with the OPERAS Research Infrastructure, outreach and engagement activities will be expanded across Europe to attract eligible authors to the platform. ORE is expected to support a growing number of research outputs each year, making publicly funded science more accessible and transparent while setting a benchmark for equitable publishing initiatives in Europe and beyond. More information on the future platform at: https://ore.eu    [1] https://scienceeurope.org/our-resources/action-plan-for-diamond-open-access/ [2] Austrian Science Fund (FWF), European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), French National Research Agency (ANR), French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), German Federal Ministry for Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR), Italian Ministry of Universities and Research (MUR), Dutch Research Council (NWO), Research Council of Norway (RCN), Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal (FCT), Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (ARIS), Swedish research funders (Forte, Formas and the Swedish Research Council), Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology (FECYT), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [3] Current platform (operational till fall 2026):  https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu  

CERN

Please also share with colleagues who may be involved in community-supported publishing.

#OpenAccess #DiamondOA #ScholarlyCommunication #AcademicPublishing #LibraryPublishing #OpenScience #KnowledgeAsAPublicGood

A new preprint, “Academic Publishing in Occupied Territories: Challenges to Research Integrity and Academic Trust,” uncovers the complex legal and ethical challenges surrounding the unlawful appropriation of Ukraine-born academic journals by the occupation authorities of the Russian Federation.

By applying bibliometric methods, the study examines visibility and impact of these journals.

@hauschke

#AcademicPublishing #ScholarlyCommunication #Geopolitics

https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/uh3r5_v1

OSF

Not long now until #UKSG2026 in Glasgow.

The EMS Press team will be at Stand #62, and we’re looking forward to meeting colleagues from across scholarly communication.

We’ll also have some news to share during the conference, so stay tuned. ✨

@UKSG
#EMSPress #AcademicPublishing #Libraries

📢 IMC 2026 Cycle 1 Results

Out of 106 submissions:
✅ 11 papers accepted
🔄 12 papers invited for one-shot revision

Additionally:
✅ 12 one-shot revision papers from IMC 2025 Cycle 2 accepted

Congratulations to all accepted authors and thank you to everyone who submitted!

#IMC2026 #NetworkMeasurement #AcademicPublishing

"So if AI detection becomes impossible, we will have to assume humanity just to operate normally. As I mentioned, this is serving me relatively well in editing and marking, I will assume that if something has someone’s name or signature, they wrote it, and they should assume all of the consequences of that text.

For the same reason, I don’t think that any sort of legislative solution will work. The technology is too far ahead to expect any sort of ban. We could probably try to enact legislation that sets the obligation for LLM developers to clearly identify when an AI has been used to generate text, but this would only open the door for models that have been trained in countries without such restrictions to become popular. And then there will probably be AI humanisers that will get rid of such identifiers.

A solution that appears to be emerging in many writing circles is to loudly attack anyone who is using AI text, and to try to gather consensus in the writing professions to loudly oppose any sort of AI use. Writers are now at the stage in which artists were back in 2022, AI is just about to get good enough as to threaten people’s jobs. So there is a bit of a siege mentality emerging, where the first instict will be to punish and ostracise anyone who breaks this code. I’m highly skeptical of this approach as it is likely to lead to witch-hunts, false accusations, purity spirals, and other nasty online behaviour that is not likely to fix the problem.

Eventually, I think that we will find some balance."

https://www.technollama.co.uk/why-are-people-adopting-ai-to-write

#AI #GenerativeAI #LLMs #Writing #AcademicPublishing

Why are people adopting AI to write?

The last few weeks I have witnessed a number of interesting discussions breaking out on social media. A couple of weeks ago a US-based academic admitted using AI in some of his writing, which promp…

TechnoLlama

The new T&F guidelines for editors when accepting paper submissions.

#humor #funny #ai #fakepapers #academia #academicchatter #academicpublishing

RE: https://ecoevo.social/@PeerCommunityIn/116261952869789585

Had to pleasure to attend yesterday, an hour well spent!

#academia #academicpublishing

Springer Nature expands use of AI across publishing workflows - Research Information https://www.researchinformation.info/news/springer-nature-expands-use-of-ai-across-publishing-workflows/

#AcademicPublishing

Springer Nature expands use of AI across publishing workflows - Research Information

Publisher expects the use of tools to grow by further 25% in 2026 as it continues embedding AI through workflows

Research Information

Just received an email asking me to peer-review a paper, and asking me to decide whether to review it based on an abstract in which every piece of LaTeX code has been replaced with ‘[[EQUATION]]’, so that it reads like:

‘For [[EQUATION]], let [[EQUATION]] be the semigroup of partial bijections on the lattice [[EQUATION]]. For a subset [[EQUATION]] of [[EQUATION]] with size at most [[EQUATION]], we show that [[EQUATION]] and [[EQUATION]] are the unique possible...’

I am not quoting the actual text, but this gives the idea. The email was generated by the publisher's paper management system, so I assume it is to blame, not the editor.

Over the years, I have developed fairly low expectations of academic publishers, but this particular bit of incompetence is new to me.

#academia #AcademicPublishing #AcademicChatter