@xmark

54 Followers
351 Following
201 Posts
Privacy Engineer, Veteran, PD Soros Fellow (he/him)

Surely I’m not the only one who reads “MacBook Neo” as “MacBook New Engine Option”.

Actually, come to think of it, that’s rather apropos.

ICE hasn’t gone; they’re just finding ways to operate that are less visible, finding targets with fewer eyes watching:

https://sahanjournal.com/immigration/mobile-home-parks-immigration-enforcement-ice-minnesota/

Don’t forget the people ICE is targeting. Don’t let them become invisible.

Twin Cities mobile home parks feel the pain of immigration enforcement, often in isolation

Residents say they’re seeing ICE and immigration agents at mobile home parks in Minnesota, but don’t receive as much support as other neighborhoods.

Sahan Journal
@jsmall Heh, good question
my face when someone tells me "Christopher Nolan REFUSES to use 'CGI'"

You might be thinking that this is some unusual incident, that the press is cherry-picking and dramatizing the most sensational events.

I live in Minneapolis. The location in this article is pretty close to me. And I am telling you:

The press is •under•-covering what’s happening here. ICE is doing absolutely batshit stuff all the time, every single day, all over the city.

It is exhausting. 🧵

https://mastodon.social/@AnnaAnthro/115719761333110884

Many talented Ukrainian actors, artists, comedians, sportspeople, and others left their professional careers to take up arms and defend their country from Russian occupiers.

Russia's war against Ukraine has taken the lives of at least 240 Ukrainian culture makers. This is a great loss. They could have enriched Ukrainian and global culture with their talent for many more years to come.

Eternal glory and memory to all who gave their lives for Ukraine.
#AureFreePress #News #press #headline

...and so even though @404mediaco isn't *actually* connecting the dots yet, it's at least pointing out that there *might* be alternatives. Which Apple must *hate*.

If their staff ever got a demo of PWAs, I suspect it might even radicalise them.

You up, @owa?

"One of the many ways it convinces us of this lie is by telling women that we are entitled, spoiled, and excessively demanding for insisting on being treated as fully human. So it should come as no surprise that patriarchy often hand-waves away our oppression and pretends it’s only a concern for privileged women...

(2/4)

I see that Hegseth wants to administratively separate service members who have medical waivers for shaving.

It's hard to imagine this as anything other than a targeted means of pushing Black people out of the military.

For those that don't know, the military has "personal grooming standards" that are enforced across the services; this includes a requirement to shave daily, if applicable. This is for a few reasons: to ensure a "uniform, military appearance", but also nominally to ensure a good seal with a gas mask.

However, so-called "no-shave chits" can be issued to service members for a variety of reasons, and these waivers exempt those people from this requirement.

For example, I once saw a guy who had one because a tree branch or something whacked him in the face during an exercise and gave him a gnarly slice that needed stitches. He couldn't reasonably shave _over_ the stitches, so medical gave him a no-shave chit while that was healing.

But the most common reason for issuing no-shave chits is for folks with "Pseudofolliculitis Barbae" (PFB), more commonly known as razor bumps, which are ingrown hair follicles on the face and neck.

Razor bumps are a real thing, and while I understand they are extremely painful, more concerning is that they can become infected, rendering a service member mission incapable.

But here's the thing: razor bumps affect Black folks more than others; up to 60% to 80% of adult Black men who shave regularly will experience them. The percentage among other demographics is much, much lower; like close to an order of magnitude lower. The military's own data, snapshotted in 2023, says that 63.5% of PFB cases since 2000 were among non-Hispanic Black service members (https://health.mil/News/Articles/2023/08/01/Pseudofolliculitis-barbae).

And let me be clear here: this is a real, known, diagnosable medical condition, studied and recognized by dermatologists. It's not like there's some kind of conspiracy to get out of shaving or something dumb like that. And from everyone I've ever known who's had it, they'd really, really, rather they didn't. I understand it sucks.

So separating service members who have medical shaving waivers will disproportionately affect Black service members. There's no way Hegseth et al don't know this.

"But wait a minute! What about the gas mask thing!?" I hear someone ask, "that sounds pretty legit." Ok, here's the deal: the waiver says you don' t have to shave down to the skin; it doesn't say you don't keep things trim and keep facial hare short. No one with a no-shave chit is running around with a full beard that's keeping them from putting on a gas mask.

But even if they were, what about all the SpecOps guys with their "operator beards"? And anyone who's been on a multiday mission outside the wire knows there are times when adherence to the grooming standards takes a backseat to operational necessities; most of us have gone a couple of days without a shave.

And if there were really a serious threat of chemical warfare and you absolutely needed to ensure you could get a seal with a gas mask, you'd shave regardless of the chit or you'd be in MOPP-4 anyway (with no exposed skin). Note that a gas mask really only covers the face and eyes; you'd be putting on a hood and other equipment to cover up the rest including, you guessed it, the area of the face and neck where the seal isn't perfect.

So yeah. I fail to see any way in which this effort is anything other than explicitly racist.