@johncarlosbaez @snarkweek
(sometimes we forget that old puzzles have been solved)
Climate Science denial is a very Anglo-Saxon phenomenon[1]. It has has known explanations that connect it to other denials and science denial in general [2][3]. There was a network of individuals and organizations behind it.
In short:
It started in the 1950s. Anti-communism and associating government regulation with communism led to network of well funded denial. Denial of tobacco smoking causing cancer, acid rain, DDT, the hole in the ozone layer, climate change. Same organizations, lobby groups, and scientists.
It took long time to take a hold. Environmentalism remained bipartisan for a long time, Richard Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency, signed Clean Air Act extension, Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act.
They triumphed under Ronald Reagan.
Orginal culprits: Bill Nierenberg, Fred Seitz, and Fred Singer. The Heritage Foundation https://www.heritage.org/, George C. Marshall Institute https://www.marshallcenter.org/en
CEI https://cei.org/
----
[1]: Poles Apart: The International Reporting of Climate Scepticism, by James Painter (2013) https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research/files/Poles%2520Apart%2520the%2520international%2520reporting%2520of%2520climate%2520scepticism.pdf
[2] Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (2010), by , Naomi Oreskes, Erik M. Conway
[3] Requiem for a Species: Why We Resist the Truth about Climate Change (2010), by Clive Hamilton