Aight y’all, so I think some folks have me sideways here —
“There was a legitimate target next to it” is NEVER and excuse for blowing up a hospital, school, or other sensitive civilian target. It happens all the time, and it is always wrong.
Also, I don’t trust Iran worth a fuck. I just also don’t trust Israel or the current US government. Everyone is lying. What I know is hospitals in Gaza, Israel, Iran, Sudan, and Ukraine keep getting blown up, and that is wrong.
I've been sitting on this for a while, and it's not much, but in light of Wellnhofer's contribution I'd like to propose:
"Maintenance Terms", as distinct from licensing terms:
https://github.com/mhoye/maintenance-terms
Access to code is no promise of access to people.
Something that’s been bothering me for years in the security world: why do researchers demand bug bounties for vulnerabilities in open source projects, when the very contributors maintaining and fixing those issues get nothing, just goodwill?
It feels deeply unfair. The burden falls on unpaid maintainers, yet bounty hunters get rewarded. If you want a paid bounty, maybe help fund the people who actually fix the mess too.
Luigi is charged as a terrorist for tagging a CEO, but a man who targeted 3 individuals, including 2 senators, is not charged as a terrorist.
Do you guys see it now? Yet?
Heather exposes that calling MCP an "open standard" is incorrect.
It's so incorrect it could be called a lie, similar to the other lies coming from the AI world. It is not "open": it is controlled by one company with no obvious way to contribute to it. It is not a "standard": if you read https://modelcontextprotocol.io/introduction, you'll see that it is described by "here, trust our code" not "here is how you can write your own code".
This could have been easily fixed if they actually wanted an open standard. Setting up a quickie focused SDO with mailing lists and so on takes a few days at most. (Please don't reply that it is not possible to do it that quickly or easily: I've done it.) They didn't bother, even after announcing MCP, so it's clear they don't want an open standard.
I'm glad MCP seems to work for a few use cases. #MCP folks: please stop lying about it an open standard or, better yet, please do the work to make it an open standard.
https://mas.to/@sphcow/114697886847062461
I don't recall seeing much measurement research on mobile carrier identification from client traffic. Didn't find much in a cursory search.
Does this exist? Is it feasible, particularly with branded devices like this?
Can classification be done by address pools unique, IDs, MACs, user agent strings, default start-up apps, default DNS queries/settings, etc.?
Clue, ideas, and pointers wanted.
https://journa.host/@w7voa/114693187624704978
Attached: 1 image CNBC - A company owned by President Trump announces it own branded Trump Mobile cell phone service and will sell a "T1" smartphone, featuring gold-colored metal case etched with an American flag. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/16/trump-mobile-phone-plan.html
McNadoMD
JA Westenberg
JP Mens
mhoye
Alexandre Dulaunoy
daniel:// stenberg://
Ericka Simone
⁂iwein⁂
John Kristoff