| Country | United States |
| Languages | English (native), Spanish (fluent), French, Portuguese |
| Country | United States |
| Languages | English (native), Spanish (fluent), French, Portuguese |
What could contribute more to government efficiency than securing lucrative contracts for your crypto donors to implement inefficient technology that is uniquely suited to solving problems you don’t have?
Elon Musk has initiated conversations about using blockchain technology at the new Department of Government Efficiency, according to people with knowledge of the discussions. It’s the latest sign of the Trump administration’s efforts to bolster the digital asset industry.
Anyone else thinks "transformative agreements" by big publishers aren't really that transformative? Seems like another way we 'bend' to their will and guarantee their comfortable oligopoly and survival.
The #copyright implications of #ChatGPT and other AI are pretty interesting. In the US, the Copyright Office won't register a copyright for purely AI-generated content (see https://bit.ly/3JXLyWW), but will for works that adapt and modify AI-generated content: https://petapixel.com/2022/09/27/ai-generated-artwork-is-copyrighted-for-the-first-time/.
Just as with #OER and #creativecommons licenses, the notions of attribution and delineating modifications needs to filter out into general copyright law when human vs. machine creation of content is at issue.
What are the #copyright and #licensing and #oer implications for #chatgpt. See the below (https://openai.com/api/policies/sharing-publication/#content-co-authored-with-the-openai-api-policy):
“Here is some stock language you may use to describe your creative process, provided it is accurate:
‘The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.’”