How are things going in the other spaces?
Well, if you ask people in DMs on Twitter if they want a Bluesky invite, the DM never goes through. (Asking if they want something like a "y k s e u l b" invite does, and I've confirmed this multiple times).
How are things going in the other spaces?
Well, if you ask people in DMs on Twitter if they want a Bluesky invite, the DM never goes through. (Asking if they want something like a "y k s e u l b" invite does, and I've confirmed this multiple times).
“ Steve Wozniak: If you want to learn about AI killing people, “Get a Tesla” “ – SkyMagzines
https://skymagzines.com/steve-wozniak-if-you-want-to-learn-about-ai-killing-people-get-a-tesla/
#Tesla
#Elmo
#ElonMusk
#AI #ML #SelfDriving
#Artificialintelligence
#MachineLearning
#EthicalAI
#AIEthics
#BigTech
#BigData
#Apple
This is an outstanding reply to, and analysis of that Pamela Paul column in the New York Times that began this way:
"A paper that says science should be impartial was rejected by major journals. You can’t make this up."
Dave Karpf, an academic, takes it apart. He also testifies as a particiant in the peer review system. Worth your time.
https://davekarpf.substack.com/p/pamela-paul-cancel-culture-grifters?utm_medium=ios
An average user’s conversational exchange with ChatGPT basically amounts to dumping a large bottle of fresh water out on the ground, according to the new study.
https://gizmodo.com/chatgpt-ai-water-185000-gallons-training-nuclear-1850324249
The media, at least those that are even bothering to cover it, are truly missing the forest for the trees. The disaster of the bird site is not its garbage performance and functionality “clunkiness.” It’s that it’s a goddamned misinformation fascist propaganda engine. That’s it. That’s the story. I’ve been trying to get journalists to cover it. Guess I have to do it myself.