@expertenkommision_cyberunfall @nini @crk5 it's worth noting that there's a distinction to be made here. Billionaires are not a "group" in the sense you are referencing.

This is not a cohesive social group with inherent shared physical or cultural characteristics. These are distinct individuals, who are being categorised purely by a shared set of choices to harm others.

It is dangerous to conflate these different classification frameworks, and apply argumentation from one onto another.

@expertenkommision_cyberunfall @crk5 Yes. 100%. I'm never gonna feel remorse about this. If these abusers don't wanna be called parasites they can stop parasiting.

I've been called Neanderthal, luddite, autistic retard by AI bros religiously defending these billionaires' little products made from sucking human blood and sweat. People are fodder in their treadmills without proper defenses. I genuinely dgaf if the symbolic mirror is "too harsh". It's out of proportion.

@expertenkommision_cyberunfall @krautdragon @crk5 Lets's use a real world example. Nazi Germany levellled several cities from rheir air and was beaten in their attempt to flatten London. When the war was over Berlin and most other German cities looked like Gaza today.

What comes around really does go around in this workd.

@expertenkommision_cyberunfall @Grutjes
to quote the first definition wiktionary gives: "An organism that lives on or in another organism of a different species, deriving benefit from living on or in that other organism, while not contributing towards that other organism sufficiently to cover the cost to that other organism."

I think this is in no way dehumanizing in the context of billionaires. They are organisms that derive benefit from others without contributing anything to them.