| Company | https://www.improvein.com |
| Personal | https://diegogurpegui.com |
| Company | https://www.improvein.com |
| Personal | https://diegogurpegui.com |
If you are skeptical or critical of #Bitcoin (as I was a years ago), or if you know someone that is, I hope this article can answer some concerns and generate useful debate. Share it if you like it π
Any feedback is much appreciated!
English version:
https://medium.com/improve-in/bitcoin-for-skeptics-90fb1fa8d37f
Attached: 1 image Bitcoiners are joining mastodon en masse, hope you're ready for the influx @[email protected] https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/bitcoiners-losing-faith-twitter-inspire-exodus-mastodon/
I couldn't resist and created my account at @diegogurpegui
I guess I'll keep using both for now π€
#FOMO ?

@samouraidev @harding @hodlonaut this, exactly.
The focus should always be on the contribution, not the contributor. Like the message, not the messanger.
However, to avoid wasting time a little judgement based on reputation is expected
@samouraidev @hodlonaut Any project that allows pseudonymous contributions can't keep out particular contributors, and so my personal policy is that I'd welcome solid contributions from anyone no matter how awful I think they are.
But people who burned their past reputations should expect their opinions to hold a disadvantaged position in perpetuity compared to people who maintained their integrity throughout. And if they complain about that, they should be ignored.