Dr Diego Garaialde

81 Followers
107 Following
114 Posts

Assistant Professor 🏳️‍🌈 in HCI @ UCD
Interested in #BehaviourChange technology, #CognitiveScience related to #Motivation, and #Agency.

Work Account

Websitehttps://diegogaraialde.com
Personal Acc@diageo

Your phone is eating your brain's RAM even when it's completely turned off. In Ep 5 of Antisocial Scientists, we tackle the "brain drain" effect, how your phone pushes you into lazy System 1 thinking , and why a smartwatch is basically "the vape of the smoking world".
Listen here: https://batcamp.org/podcast/incel-lular-attention/

#HCI #SciencePodcast #BrainDrain #ScreenTime

Incel-lular Attention – Bat Camp

New podcast episode on the effect of ChatGPT on the Dunning-Kruger Effect, using AI to improve meta-cognition in students, and can vibecoding fix procrastination?

https://batcamp.org/podcast/ai-krugered-my-dunning/

#AI #LLM #HCI #SCIENCE #VIBECODING

AI Krugered My Dunning – Bat Camp

If you want HCI research in gamification or behaviour change, you can go to my research account: @diego

You can check out a talk I did on the topic: https://open.spotify.com/episode/2BGBUlwNt1VsgTU7P9k4X0?si=8qbJx2rnQMKUIGGL_MKkMQ

Or you can check out this HCI podcast: https://youtube.com/@antisocialscientists?si=pVnmPYyGkJBatTX6

#HCI #research #science #socialmedia

Making us Make Better Decisions: Dual Process Theories, Gamification and Decision Making in HCI (Pt1)- Talk by Dr Diego Garaialde

The Human in the Machine · Episode

Spotify

Currently hiring a PhD student in HCI. Apply now!

https://t.co/CMx9meUiUZ

Phd Scholarship - The Persuasive Impact of Technology: Tool for Manipulation or Foundation for Change - UCD School of Computer Science

@justinedwards and I talk about the infamous "your brain on chatgpt" paper. Then we explain how the game The Sims can teach us about motivation and decision making.

https://batcamp.org/podcast/cognitive-motherlode/

Cognitive Motherlode – Bat Camp

Congratulations to @phil and all the other authors on publishing a fantastic paper on the Partner Modelling Questionnaire.

https://dl-acm-org.ucd.idm.oclc.org/doi/10.1145/3729170

Shibboleth Authentication Request

Being mostly off social media I forgot to congratulate the team on the published paper this year:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3613904.3642542

Congrats @ThomasMildner, Orla Cooney, Anna-Maria Meck, Marion Bartl, Gian-Luca Savino, Philip R Doyle, Diego Garaialde, Leigh Clark, John Sloan, Nina Wenig, Rainer Malaka, Jasmin Niess

Listening to the Voices: Describing Ethical Caveats of Conversational User Interfaces According to Experts and Frequent Users | Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

ACM Conferences

In 2005, John P. A. Ioannidis published a paper ooutlining how certain biases in our publishing infastructure mean that the majority of research findings are likely false. Do you think that's still the case?

https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0020124&type=printable

#Software usage and citation in #RetractedArticles differs from other articles.

The results of our analysis of 3271 retracted articles and 1924 retraction notices are finally published @QSS_ISSI
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00275

Retracted articles use less free and open-source software and cite it worse

Abstract. As an essential mechanism of scientific self-correction, articles are retracted for many reasons including errors in processing data and computation of results. In today’s data-driven science, the validity of research data and results significantly depends on the software employed. We investigate the relationship between software usage and research validity, eventually leading to article retraction, by analyzing software mentioned across 1,924 retraction notices and 3,271 retracted articles. We systematically compare software mentions and related information with control articles sampled by Coarsened Exact Matching by recognizing publication year, scientific domain, and journal rank. We identify article retractions caused by software errors or misuse and find that retracted articles use fewer free and open-source software hampering reproducible research and quality control. Moreover, such differences are also present concerning software citation, where retracted articles less frequently follow software citation guidelines regarding free and open-source software.Peer Review. https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/qss_a_00275

MIT Press

Is Butter Back?
Systematic Review finds that consuming butter has no connection to increased mortality, cardiovascular events, and diabetes.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27355649/

Is Butter Back? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Butter Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Total Mortality - PubMed

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests relatively small or neutral overall associations of butter with mortality, CVD, and diabetes. These findings do not support a need for major emphasis in dietary guidelines on either increasing or decreasing butter consumption, in comparison to other …

PubMed