Nick Bowman (包尼克) he/him/his

155 Followers
76 Following
69 Posts
I'm a media psychologist who studies the cognitive, emotional, physical, and social demands of interactive media. Currently faculty at S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University, USA.
Google Scholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=yuEsK7EAAAAJ&hl=en
Syracuse University biohttps://newhouse.syr.edu/people/nick-bowman
ORCidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5594-9713
IWM anzeige.html

Wissenserwerb, Wissensvermittlung und Wissensaustausch mit innovativen Technologien stehen im Zentrum der Forschung des Leibniz-Instituts fuer Wissensmedien.

@dansinker Right. And my point is that GPTchat is not a threat to Google search; it will be another option for how to access it. (Though we have a problem upcoming: how to differentiate among (1) NLP and ML that only predict language, (2) ML that is built to reliably deliver credible facts in its narrative NLP, (3) ML that is trained on the broad internet and thus reflects all our biases and junk, and (4) ML trained on curated data & limited in spitting back bad stuff.)
A fresh pub out with @bowmanspartan - development/validation of a scale to measure the perceived moral patiency of social robots (the degree to which we see them as being deserving of our moral consideration.) There is a modular version (six subscales that can be used independently to focus on upholding/violating discrete moral foundations) and a shorter omnibus version (capturing degrees of deserved upholding of all six foundations).
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12369-022-00950-6 @ICA_HMC @communicationscholars
Perceived Moral Patiency of Social Robots: Explication and Scale Development - International Journal of Social Robotics

As robots are increasingly integrated into human social spheres, they will be put in situations in which they may be perceived as moral patients—the actual or possible targets of humans’ (im)moral actions by which they may realize some benefit or suffering. However, little is understood about this potential, in part due to a lack of operationalization for measuring humans’ perceptions of machine moral patiency. This paper explicates the notion of perceived moral patiency (PMP) of robots and reports the results of three studies that develop a scale for measuring robot PMP and explore its measurements with relevant social dynamics. We ultimately present an omnibus six-factor scale, with each factor capturing the extent to which people believe a robot deserves a specific kind of moral consideration as specified by moral foundations theory (care, fairness, loyalty, authority, purity, liberty). The omnibus PMP scale’s factor structure is robust across both in-principle and in-context evaluations, and measures contextualized (local) PMP as distinct from heuristic (global) PMP.

SpringerLink

Out now? Page proofs for Tim Wulf and I’s most recent collaboration: a summary of recent research on video game nostalgia for Current Opinion in Psychology. Give a read, and we’re happy to share additional notes if you’d like: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X22002652

This one gives a nice "state of the state" for folks researching #medianostalgia #videogames #retrogaming and others. =)

My latest words: I'm not all that afraid of a ChatGPT future because the future is about asking questions anyhow. https://jeremylittau.substack.com/p/whos-afraid-of-chatgpt
Who's afraid of ChatGPT?

OpenAI's new generative text chat tool has gone viral. People who teach writing are afraid, but they shouldn't be.

The Unraveling
Working with VR/AR/XR? Check out International Association of Immersive Technology Innovation (IAITI), shared via @sunjooahn. Abstracts being accepted until 15 January 2023: https://www.iaiti.net/conference
8th XR-Metaverse Conference | IAITI

Metaverse Conference, XR Conference, Las Vegas, IAITI

IAITI
When you get that notification on your computer but because you're running a dozen+ social media and communication platforms at once, you ... have no idea.

It's time for an #introduction: We are the Digital Democracy Centre.

We are an interdisciplinary hub at the University of Southern Denmark. We study how digital technologies and AI affect democratic processes and institutions.

We work across disciplines.
We come from different parts of the world.
We use different methodologies.
We like challenges 😁

Check out: https://www.sdu.dk/en/ddc

#democracy #commodon #AI #digitaltech boost & follow=💞

Digital Democracy Centre

Digital Democracy Centre

sdu
What I like about editor @katederickson commentary on peer review is that it (nicely) challenges the idea that peer reviews should be "constructive" and offer suggestions for revisions. It points out that these suggestions are coming from anonymous others whose credibility cannot be assessed, & may contradict the suggestions of others. It is also a lot more work than just reviewing. Take a look.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02637758221142339 #PeerReview @academicchatter [edited to link to the author]
@academicchatter @geography I'm still looking for an expert to talk with. If anyone with knowledge and expertise in sustainable transport could give me 5 minutes of their time before this Thursday, I'd really appreciate it!