Christian Lins

@bordfunk@norden.social
93 Followers
270 Following
859 Posts

#Professor of computer stuff; occasionally wires up lecture halls at Hamburg University of Applied Sciences (#HAWHamburg) and reports on commuting adventures by #train between #Oldenburg and #Hamburg.

Reposts random nerd and politics stuff in German or English. Posts are being deleted after 3 months.

Websitehttps://lins.me
PeerTubehttps://tube.lins.me
Zug fährt nun laut Durchsage zehn Minuten früher ab als er ankommt. #bahn #backintime

I described how these botnets are now being sold in the open, as "Residential IP proxies", where the malware is just a library added to a legitimate app that app developers include because they are promised money. Le sigh.

Part 1: https://jan.wildeboer.net/2025/02/Blocking-Stealthy-Botnets/
Part 2: https://jan.wildeboer.net/2025/04/Web-is-Broken-Botnet-Part-2/

3/3

Botnet Part 1: Those Stealthy Botnets

It’s one of those days again where botnets are hammering my little e-mail server with brute force attacks to send spam. This comes in waves, but is persistent and part of the #SysAdminLife. (They obviously fail ;)

Jan Wildeboer's Blog
Schrecklich! Einmal keinen Scheißdreck verkauft, schon ist das Geschäft kaputt! https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/verbraucher/eurobike-fahrradmesse-100.html

Seriously, who cares if Jeff #Bezos is getting married 🥱

I find this mannequin of him floating on the side of a cardboard Amazon box while clutching a wad of cash much more interesting.

https://apnews.com/video/life-size-mannequin-of-jeff-bezos-lying-on-a-giant-amazon-box-dropped-into-venices-grand-canal-5da7fa990f4045d7bdfb15ab1ede1d92

Wissen bewahren statt löschen lassen!

Eine großartige Initiative aus Hannover: IT-Profis vom TIB sichern wissenschaftliche Daten, die in den USA aus politischen Gründen gelöscht werden sollen – etwa zur Klimaforschung. Ein wichtiges Zeichen für freie Wissenschaft und den Erhalt von Wissen für kommende Generationen.

#WissenSchützen #FreiheitDerWissenschaft #Datenrettung #TIBHannover #Klimaforschung

https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/niedersachsen/hannover_weser-leinegebiet/it-profis-aus-hannover-retten-daten-vor-loeschung-durch-us-regierung,daten-100.html

Donald Trump lässt Daten löschen, in Hannover werden sie gerettet

Die aktuelle US-Regierung will unliebsame wissenschaftliche Daten löschen, etwa zur Klimaforschung. Am Leibniz-Informationszentrum Technik und Naturwissenschaften in Hannover (TIB) sichern Forscher diese Daten.

ndr.de

Linus Torvalds isn't just really smart, he's also a good person.

#linux #linustorvalds #lgbtq #progressive

Um das klarzustellen: EINE EINZIGE Milliardärsfamilie verkackt es versehentlich (!), die Erbschaftssteuer zu dodgen und verursacht dadurch Steuereinnahmen, die die gescheiterte BUNDESWEITE Kindergrundsicherung zu 166% abgedeckt hätten. Imagine, man würde alle Superreichen konsequent fair besteuern.
Was eine mega Aktion der #UniMarburg . Bitte weitreichend boosten , hoffentlich machen noch mehr Universitäten mit.
Wissen ist Macht !!!! Was dumme Menschen anrichten können wir jeden Tag mit Schrecken ansehen ! #supporthavard #academicfreedom
Bei einem Feuer in einem Mehrfamilienhaus in Wilhelmshaven starb ein vierjähriges Kind. Die Familie hatte zuvor rassistische Anfeindungen erlebt.
https://taz.de/!6092993
Rassismus in Wilhelmshaven: Kind stirbt bei mutmaßlichem Brandanschlag

Bei einem Feuer in einem Mehrfamilienhaus in Wilhelmshaven starb ein vierjähriges Kind. Die Familie hatte zuvor rassistische Anfeindungen erlebt.

TAZ Verlags- und Vertriebs GmbH
Anthropic destroyed millions of print books to build its AI models
Company hired Google's book-scanning chief to cut up and digitize "all the books in the world."
https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/06/anthropic-destroyed-millions-of-print-books-to-build-its-ai-models/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social
×
Anthropic destroyed millions of print books to build its AI models
Company hired Google's book-scanning chief to cut up and digitize "all the books in the world."
https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/06/anthropic-destroyed-millions-of-print-books-to-build-its-ai-models/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social
@arstechnica Even the ones that RFK Jr reads for health and science info. And there's the problem. AI has no discernment.

@arstechnica It's not necessary to do this. Machines are available that can scan books without damaging them.

As used for these, for example: https://www.cambridge.org/core/publications/collections/cambridge-library-collection

The machines aren't cheap, mind, and need careful handling.

Cambridge Library Collection

Welcome to Cambridge Core

Cambridge Core

@TimWardCam @arstechnica

I'm afraid that you, like me, need reprogramming in order to reside in the 21st Century.

A bias against destroying things is so, so out of fashion.

To begin your readjustment, write this on the blackboard 535 times:

I MUST MOVE FAST AND BREAK THINGS.

There, now, don't you feel more... more... more "modern"?

@oldclumsy_nowmad @arstechnica Yeah, our kids were like that. They even treated things like bicycles as temporary and disposable, whereas we treated them as serious pieces of capital equipment.

@TimWardCam @arstechnica

Thanks for speaking out in favor of respect for books (and other things that are investments of human and natural resources).

@oldclumsy_nowmad @arstechnica I'm married to a publisher.

But I was always brought up to respect books. To the extent that the one or two times in my life that I've thrown a book away because it was so crap I didn't want to inflict it on anyone else felt like a very strange thing to do.

@TimWardCam @arstechnica I came here to say the same, I'm sure I saw a triangle shaped scanner somewhere once. As an added bonus, I bet it's even faster since you don't have to rip the pages off and you can do two pages at once

@arstechnica
God damn, fuck these people.

(Do not talk to me about how they did what conservators do in preserving content digitally. These people are shite.)

@mtconleyuk @arstechnica and conservators typically avoid damaging the original media or restore the original media.
@arstechnica I am totally blind. When I scan print books, I often ruin them because I have to either press down on them if I use a flatbed scanner, or hold them open if I use a document scanner. Making books available online (provided they're in accessible formats), means that more won't have to be destroyed and those of us who must rely on screen readers and ocr won't have to spend hours scanning just so we can read the books.

@dandylover1 @arstechnica Have you contacted people who scan books on a large scale, like Carl Malamud's projects?

They have tools that seem to be able to do scanning without destroying the books. And they don't have a lot of money. They are friendly folks who are probably more than happy to share ideas, plans, and know sources for such machines.

@karlauerbach @dandylover1 @arstechnica Specifically, it's usually not one, but two scanners, and instead of scanners they're normal off the shelf digital cameras. Books simply rest comfortably on two plates of glass that meet at an angle, with each camera pointed at its own page, which means there is no need to destroy, or even carefully unbind anything. You just open the book as far as it was designed to be opened in the first place.
@TheRealPomax @karlauerbach @arstechnica I would love something like that. I have a Pearl camera, which has a wonderful stand and guide to help place the book, but it still just lies flat on the table, so if it's prone to closing or doesn't open all the way, I still have to hold it to ensure that everything scans properly.
@dandylover1 @karlauerbach @arstechnica there's a few "how to make one yourself" tutorials out there, but I'll be honest, if I had to make one myself I'd find a much handier friend to make one for me and then pay them in food and/or drinks =D
@karlauerbach @arstechnica No. Most of what I read is in the public domain, and the only books I scan are ones I own, so usually, a little warping to the spine is okay. It only annoys me if the book is an antique. However, this is truly a wonderful source, and I may ask if they can scan Male and Female Costume by Beau Brummell, so that it can be made accessible for all!

@dandylover1 @arstechnica sure but you are one person who only has access to a flatbed scanner.

Industrial scanners exist that can hold a book open at an angle and scan the page while in the book without damaging them. A company with billions in funding can afford that.

@indiealexh @arstechnica I agree about that. Usually, even I use my Pearl camera, which is far less fdamaging. But if these scanners are available to more than just libraries, museums, and other such institutions, they should definitely use them! Why destroy books if it's not necessary to do so?

@dandylover1 @arstechnica Contrary to quasi-religious belief it‘s absolutely a-ok to destroy a paperback that has many prints in the process of media transformation for accessibility.
It may even save some books from vanishing. I still have tons of obscure, old media that’ll never be made available electronically that I want to transform to save it.
Telling a blind person about destruction free book scanning of paperbacks is misguided.

(Still: make sure to feed your authors and poets!)

@chris @arstechnica Yes. There is a huge difference between scanning a modern copy of an old book and scanning the original! What drives me crazy is when modern paperbacks are copied from old ones, and instead of actually retyping or scanning and correcting them so that the new one is clean and ledgible, they just take a picture of it, so that the new hard copy has the same handwriting, fading,, discolouration, ripped pages, etc. as the original! It basically makes the book useless to me as an alternative to an online scanned copy in similar condition because my software would scan the printed copy as badly as the pdf!
@dandylover1 @arstechnica Yeah, but that's not what they did.
@arstechnica curious to know what kind of books they fed it, to know what kind of BS will be produced.
@arstechnica Techbros are barbarians. They are neither educated nor intellectual. Musk is not an outlier. He may be the most pungent among them, but in the end, it's just leaves from the same rotten tree ...

@arstechnica I once read this in a science fiction book and thought this was a ridiculous idea by the author.

WTF??

@arstechnica

More proof that LLM people are arseholes of the highest order.

@arstechnica Have you read Virnor Vinge's novel "Rainbows End"?

In that book libraries are digitized by shredding the books into pieces and scanning the pieces while they fall through the air immediately after the shredding.

Materials that are overlooked and not scanned fall into a pre-history category and effectively fall out of human knowledge.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbows_End_(Vinge_novel)

Rainbows End (Vinge novel) - Wikipedia

@karlauerbach

Here to fanboy-gush about this book. Soooo good.

@arstechnica And they had a license to use the data in each of course.

Right?

Right???

@nazokiyoubinbou @arstechnica this! I work in a publishing house and I actually don't mind the destroying books all that much (unless they are rare or antique) but most of those were probably covered by copyright.
EDIT: They didn't, it's in the article. In fact they destroyed the original copies in order to say that they just transformed the way they use legally bought books. And the court accepted that strategy.
@nazokiyoubinbou @arstechnica The judge ruled fair use because they destroyed the books, so they didn't need it. What a fucking world.

@vonxylofon @arstechnica I can't think of any way in which that makes sense.

I mean by that token, it would be ok to commit corporate espionage as long as you make memorize it and destroy the original.

@nazokiyoubinbou @arstechnica This is copyright. Copyright stopped making sense by the time 1920s rolled over.

@arstechnica

Not in a dicky tone, but isn't this ultimately what AI is about? The creators want all knowledge sifted through their filters. A book is a bomb to their ownership goals. Leaving a paper trail, so to speak, is bad for business.

@arstechnica They are in such a hurry, they must destroy data to get to it.

@arstechnica

Having seen many books rot away and be thrown out.
Especially the "useless" ones.

I think the cost of one book being transferred from a physical medium into a digital one is a small price to pay.

And I say that as a book lover.

@n_dimension I have too and I agree with you -- but are these digital books actually made available to anyone?

@arstechnica

@arstechnica @Gargron Cutting up ONE copy of a book in order to scan it is not destroying literature and knowledge, y’all.

It’s OK. There are lots and lots of copies of all the books. It’s not 1580 and books aren’t transcribed by hand.

On the plus side, at least the author made a couple of bucks before getting their work stolen.

@arstechnica @Gargron I can’t even bring myself to write in the margin of a book … in pencil.

@arstechnica

I'm torn two fold by this

As someone whose job it once was to digitize books WITHOUT destroying them, I KNOW it's possible to do this non destructively.

But also that job would have been SO much easier if I could have cut the spine off. And TBH, not every book is a one of a kind precious cultural artifact. We can easily sacrifice a copy of nearly every book that's ever been written especially if it means we can archive the contents and make it accessible to more people.

Though whether or not Googles company here is doing the "make it accessible" part for anything other than AI is not known to me.

Ya gotta get that shit into the computer somehow. You gonna type it in?
Rainbows End - BookWyrm

From the back cover: World famous poet Robert Gu missed twenty years of progress while he nearly died from Alzheimer's. Now, when he awakens in San Diego, in the year 2025, with his mind and health restored, reality's a shock. Books are just about gone. Computers are old news, replaced by "smart" contact lenses that connect him to the Internet via his clothes and wireless nodes just about everywhere. Buildings look low rent -- unless you're wearing. Then, they look like whatever you want. Even he is different. He's seventy-five, but his treatment has made him look almost a teen. And that's just the tip of the iceberg in the new Digital Age. As Gu tries to catch up with his future, a mysterious stranger draws him and other innocents into a conspiracy that could have disastrous consequences. Before he knows it, he's in so deep that even his high-ranking military son and daughter-in-law are clueless. His only hope -- the world's only hope -- is that his thirteen-year-old granddaughter Miri and her secret friend, Mr. Rabbit, might be able to keep the worst from happening....

@arstechnica vernor vinge predicted this would happen in the book "rainbows end" he even got the year right too. Neeto
@arstechnica It's like Savonarola all over again.
@arstechnica books bought in bulk, probably no rare book was destroyed, we create and destroy (hopefully recycle into new books) millions of books every year already.
@arstechnica This surely breaches copyright in many ways: modern day enclosure writ large!