| Website | https://adamcaudill.com/ |
| Github | https://github.com/adcaudill |
| Exposera | https://exposera.com/u/adamcaudill |
| Website | https://adamcaudill.com/ |
| Github | https://github.com/adcaudill |
| Exposera | https://exposera.com/u/adamcaudill |
(Not so) fun fact: Ars Technica story on this incident got retracted. I’ve noticed that the article “disappeared” and this got me confused at first: was this story a fake after all? Why would Ars Technica report on it and then pull back?
Turns out, their article contained AI-hallucinated quotes:
“On Friday afternoon, Ars Technica published an article containing fabricated quotations generated by an AI tool and attributed to a source who did not say them.”
Yes, way to go for an article on failing of the so-called “AI”…
I was watching a video on Russia rushing to move from Starlink to other satellite internet options, including a Gazprom-owned system using satellites in geosynchronous orbit. I wonder how long it'll be until we start seeing countries de-orbit enemy satellites?
There's an upcoming mission to boost a NASA satellite via a new satellite that'll dock & boost the target, for a fairly cheap $30M. There's no reason I can see that the opposite wouldn't work. Using the same techniques to disturb or de-orbit an enemy satellite.
I would assume that collision avoidance would complicate this, but have to wonder if these communication satellites are manoeuvrable enough to avoid a dedicated satellite built to find and grapple a target. For a country like Ukraine, financing such a mission could have massive ROI. (Though lots of complications for the launching country.)
@zak Thanks for posting this - after several years of using this particular MBP, I finally got around to enabling per-directory history in zsh.
This exact thing has been driving me nuts lately, but I hadn't realised how annoying it was until I started to type a reply.