| Research website | http://bit.ly/rubinpsyc |
| Mastodon | https://fediscience.org/@MarkRubin |
| Google Scholar | https://scholar.google.com.au/citations?user=5pSnsUEAAAAJ&hl=en |
New Critical Metascience blog post:
"What's special about metascience? Comments on Romero (2023)”
https://markrubin.substack.com/p/whats-special-about-metascience
#Science
#OpenScience
#MetaScience
#PhilosophyOfScience
#PhilSci
#CriticalMetascience
#Preregistration
#STS
Vice-Chancellor Salaries
More than half of New South Wales vice-chancellor salaries go up as their universities' financial performances go down!
@[email protected] @[email protected] I have a less positive reading of the results: Only 8% of reviews recommended rejection of to-be-retracted papers - but 10% of reviews mentioned the retraction issue with a praising tone! And most importantly: w/o a matched control group of non-retracted papers, we have no idea whether 8% of recommended rejections are diagnostically relevant. Maybe the non-retracted papers had >= rejection recommendations? Maybe more senior reviewers reject more papers in general?
The Illusion of Generalizability
"Although the project recruited 171 researchers from 109 institutions, and 13629 research participants speaking 40 languages across 61 countries, we argue that relying solely on the typical big team methodology created an "illusion of generalizability", leading authors to overestimate the extent to which research findings can be applied globally."
Preprint: https://psyarxiv.com/avcsp/
🦣 Authors: @psforscher, @hcp4715
Mark Rubin
Tom Stafford
Philosophical Psychology