Interesting note from TLDP "Command substitution" chapter, but I am just wondering how much is too much 😬 (is it because I have already made such things? maybe...).
From https://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/commandsub.html#COMMANDSUBREF
Bioinformatician working on population genomics in the ancient DNA lab CAGT (Toulouse, France)
#MolecularEvolution #ancientDNA #aDNA #PopulationGenomics #PopGenomics #Phylogenomics #Genomics #Bioinformatics #Biology #Evolution #fedi22
website | https://www.normalesup.org/~glouvel |
gitlab | https://gitlab.com/Gullumluvl |
github | https://github.com/Gullumluvl |
So uh...
I think there is a *reasonable* framework in which the following text would be valid syntax for a workflow language 🙈
Interesting note from TLDP "Command substitution" chapter, but I am just wondering how much is too much 😬 (is it because I have already made such things? maybe...).
From https://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/commandsub.html#COMMANDSUBREF
I just saw this: TreeCloud (like a word cloud but as a tree that groups words used together):
Reading this preprint: Simulations of sequence evolution: how (un)realistic they really are and why
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.11.548509v1.full
Surprisingly the complex mixture models (e.g. C60) are more distinguishable from real data the simpler models. They note that it may be due to the trees they used for simulation, which have branch lengths inferred without the mixture models.
The top feature that distinguishes empirical from simulated alignment is the randomness of the rate-across-sites.