Student: “So Elon Musk is a trillionaire?”
Me: “Yup.”
Student: “How did he get that much money?”
Me: “Well, he doesn’t really have a trillion dollars cash. He just owns a lot of stock in companies that are valued at a trillion dollars.”
Student: “So those companies make huge profits?”
Me: “Oh gosh no. They all lose billions of dollars a year. All of them. Huge losses.”

The Economist headline: “Gen Z Mysteriously Hates Capitalism and No One Can Figure Out Why.”

@nswigger
Seriously, how fucking insane is that?
@nswigger not disagreeing with the overall message here but last I checked at least Tesla is very profitable: https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/TSLA/tesla/gross-profit
Tesla Gross Profit 2010-2024 | TSLA

Tesla annual/quarterly gross profit history and growth rate from 2010 to 2024. Gross profit can be defined as the profit a company makes after deducting the variable costs directly associated with making and selling its products or providing its services. <ul style='margin-top:10px;'> <li>Tesla gross profit for the quarter ending March 31, 2024 was <strong>$3.696B</strong>, a <strong>18.07% decline</strong> year-over-year.</li> <li>Tesla gross profit for the twelve months ending March 31, 2024 was <strong>$16.845B</strong>, a <strong>15.37% decline</strong> year-over-year.</li> <li>Tesla annual gross profit for 2023 was <strong>$17.66B</strong>, a <strong>15.31% decline</strong> from 2022.</li> <li>Tesla annual gross profit for 2022 was <strong>$20.853B</strong>, a <strong>53.26% increase</strong> from 2021.</li> <li>Tesla annual gross profit for 2021 was <strong>$13.606B</strong>, a <strong>105.22% increase</strong> from 2020.</li> </ul>

@zeenix @nswigger "Very profitable" is maybe a bit misleading if compared to stock price.

Tesla stock is valued at 403.8 with $477M last quarter net income, and $3.86B 12-month net income.

BMW stock is valued at 85 with $1.37B last quarter net income, and $7.52B 12-month net income.

I picked first random car company, but I'd wager the comparison is pretty similar no matter what.

@ananas @nswigger ok, "profitable" then but the assertion was that they're extremely loss-making.
@ananas @zeenix @nswigger you can't compare individual stock prices as there may be vastly different amount of stocks in circulation
@ananas @zeenix @nswigger (which makes the comparison even more popping thou)

@ananas @zeenix @nswigger

It doesn't make sense to compare the share prices for different companies. Any company can have whatever share price it wants by issuing or buying back shares, by having stock splits or (whatever the opposite is called, I've forgotten). You need to compare the market capitalisation (share price multiplied by the number of shares). And that makes it look even more ludicrous.

Tesla's market cap is $1.506 T.

BMW's is €43 B (around $50 B).

Tesla's market valuation is around 30x that of BMW (not the 5x that the stock prices alone would imply).

A market valuation for a company is typically a combination of how well it's doing at the moment (profit) and how much people expect it to grow. BMW is probably a relatively stable company, but the price for Tesla is assuming that it will grow by a factor of about 300. Tesla sold a bit under 2M cars last year (including some slightly dodgy accounting with Musk's companies selling to each other). That's close to 2% of total car sales. So a factor of 50x growth would mean that they have 100% of the total addressable market. More than that requires the market expanding significantly or them moving into completely new markets.

This is why Tesla is referred to as a 'meme stock': the valuation has absolutely nothing to do with how much money the company is expected to be and 100% to do with the supply of greater fools.

Greater fool theory - Wikipedia

@david_chisnall @ananas @zeenix @nswigger To be precise, only the circulating or outstanding shares should be considered. When companies do stock buybacks (instead of paying taxable dividends), they're effectively reducing the outstanding shares to increase the stock price. In sum, the market value should remain the same though.
SpaceX bought Tesla Megapacks and $131 million worth of Cybertrucks, its IPO filing shows

SpaceX's S-1 revealed hundreds of millions in Tesla purchases — and a Cybertruck order that may have boosted 2025 sales.

Business Insider
@cristianyxen That doesn't explain why Tesla was a lot more profitable before Cybertruck was a reality. Please keep in mind that I was not objecting to the general point of the toot. Just that one doesn't need to lie or exaggerate to make a point that can be easily made through truth alone.
@nswigger nitpick: Elon Musk is the only billionaire. Everyone else claiming to be a billionaire is only a milliardaire.
I thought this battle was lost in the 1980s, but recent self-immolation by the country that foisted the incorrect definition of billion on the rest of us has encouraged me to revive it.
@nswigger gen y doesn't particularly like it either. Would I be Gen Y? I was created in 1990...
@nswigger The flip side of this is how vulnerable they are. Their wealth and power is built on contracts, database records, and PR. It's all shadows.
@nswigger
"But isn't the stock value determined by firm performance --" WELL! Uh, yea ... hehe, about that
@nswigger The key is that Elon can use the fake "wealth" to get extreme low interest loans to fund his scams.
@nswigger You forgot the rich people borrow money against those stocks. And that a company can pay the owner bonuses.
@nswigger "How did he get that much money?" by basically being a parasite on the rest of the S&P 500
@nswigger IMHO all profits and assets that one can get a loan against or use as collateral should be taxed like wagework income, if not higher!

@nswigger

Maybe the student can understand why I call it the "greater fool market" instead of the "stock market".

@nswigger Tesla made $2.8 billion in 2025.

Star Link made about $8 billion.

Spacex is the only loser, even with the $8 billion star link made it lost $5 billion, mostly because their AI division apparently is a bottomless hole.

@nswigger
By the way, Gen X does so, too. We are just used to getting fucked over by... like everyone.
@nswigger I'm "Cash burn rate" KPI of year 2000 old

@nswigger Not to let facts get in the way of your lols but in 6/2020 Tesla became profitable after four consecutive quarters in the black.

Yes, Elon is an asshole and a huge disappointment but there would be no US EV industry without the pressure #tesla put on legacy manufacturers

I know I know buses and bicycles, I use them frequently but the majority of Americans never will but are more likely to drive an #ev

@nswigger also, #tesla existed before Elon and Elon was rich before Tesla. Why no angst against #paypal ? #petertheil , evil personified, got rich from PayPal too.
@nswigger *does* gen z hate capitalism? they're big stock buyers.
@lritter @nswigger You can hate something and still make the best out of it. If you can't stop it, why not at least profit from it while it lasts?
@pixelschubsi @nswigger careful. you might see the good in it after all.
@lritter @nswigger Not as long as you retain your empathy.
@pixelschubsi @nswigger empathy is no warden against insight ;)
@lritter @pixelschubsi @nswigger Karl Marx was a big stock buyer so I think we're good here
@nswigger well, they're not exactly going to run with "Capitalism: how we help run the biggest scam in the world" are they?