LOL!

1. the term " #Ubermensch" was coopted by the #Nazis, don't use it

2. Still today, the stereotypical #Nietzsche fan is a pathetic #rightWing " #alphaMale" turd shallowly servicing their male insecurities to *conform*

3. But the original idea: a self-mastering individual creating their own values

4. #AlysaLiu quit #figureSkating because it was toxic. Then she returned on her own terms, for her own joy, fuck the world

You don't have to like Nietzsche, it's a sly roast of #MAGA losers

@benroyce Saucy detail: the English for Übermensch is... Superman. 😬
@Eetschrijver @benroyce I suspect the Jews who created Superman were well aware. There's a reason he's pretty much the opposite of a Nazi.

@Eetschrijver

right!

back before, or while, the term's original intent got destroyed by the nazis

the term wiggled over into english via an american jew and a canadian jew before wwii to describe a guy in their comics who punches nazis

history is complicated

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Siegel

Jerry Siegel - Wikipedia

@benroyce @Eetschrijver Jerry’s partner Joe Shuster came from Canada, something Brian Vaughan made great use of in his series, We Stand On Guard: https://mastodon.social/@KerryMitchell/113895415574560212
@KerryMitchell @Eetschrijver oh yeah, he was a canadian in america, forgive my clumsiness, i edited my comment

@benroyce @Eetschrijver Vaughn was having a bit of fun there. Notice Vaughn, the writer, having the character pointedly say that the artist does the REAL work.

Canadian fans are legitimate believers though. The similarities between Shuster’s design of Metropolis and Toronto, his aunt Lois, and so on have often been pointed out. Also, Superman stamps and coins have been issued in Canada, based on the connection.

@KerryMitchell @Eetschrijver

You guys get wolverine, deadpool, and sabretooth. And superman? Not fair! (/s) 😆

@benroyce
We've not even talked music yet. For starters, I bid Neil Young and Joni Mitchell. 😂
@KerryMitchell

@Eetschrijver @KerryMitchell

the weeknd, justin bieber, drake, etc

(well, they can keep drake)

@benroyce
And we haven't even mentioned Patrick Watson and Ron Sexsmith yet!
@KerryMitchell
@Eetschrijver @benroyce There are some underrated Canadians. I’m surprised they’re known abroad, when they’re not so well known (particularly to the youngsters) here at home.
@benroyce I have read Nietzsche, & while I have huge disagreements with many of his views (including the ubermensch), he also broke off his relationship with Richard Wagner because of his anti-Semitism & was staunchly anti-nationalist, becoming an increasing opponent of second reich Germany. It is highly likely that had he lived to see the Nazis, he would have detested Hitler as much as grew to despise Wagner’s racial nationalism.

@archivescribe

i agree

the unfortunate truth though is the usual nietzsche fanboy today hews to the way in which the nazis were nietzsche fanboys: all in the name of shallow superficial toxic masculinity, fascism, bigotry. little desire to truly understand

we both understand the difference between nietzche's intent and what became of his words

but we still have to be careful with nietzsche fans today because of the fascist assholes who have planted their asses on the topic

@benroyce @archivescribe I had only come across the nazi interpretation of Nietzsche's work, so colour me surprised when two feminists who studied literature and philosophy started excitedly bonding over how Nietzsche's work was misunderstood.

@mayintoronto @archivescribe

even though original intent and how words are interpreted are two separate forces, the original intent does not negate the popular usage of someone's work

we run the risk of accommodating fascist assholes, so we have to stay wary of nietzsche because we want nothing to do with his fans

it's more of a lesson in the twisty ways of history, and how things are always complicated

@benroyce @mayintoronto @archivescribe Nietzsche wasn't a Nazi (his sister was and that's why he was co-opted), but he was extremely reactionary.

So, yes: not a Nazi, not an anti-semite (probably), but to be treated with caution. His iconoclastic views against Christianity and philosophy in general are eye-opening, but swallowing his writing whole without criticism is not recommended.

@flipper @mayintoronto @archivescribe

well said

i mostly posted the meme to roast MAGA losers on their terms, not rehabilitate nietzsche

@benroyce It's because so many mediocre ass-clowns quote and misquote Nietzsche to buttress their nonsensical hatreds, and it's been going on for so long, that I have always kept my fondness for the man and his work close to my chest.

One of the earliest to reject systematizing philosophy, a wicked wit, a strong thinker, an even better writer, there is a great deal in his work that I admire.

@GeePawHill

we can both appreciate doing things on our own terms and arriving at our own morality

but fascist and bigots just took nietzsche to mean "it's ok to be a fascist bigot!" and abandon morality

morons ruin everything

now we have to be wary of anyone who is a fan of nietzsche

@GeePawHill @benroyce This started before Nietzsche was even dead. His brother-in-law (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_F%C3%B6rster ) was an antisemite who tried to start an 'Aryan' colony. When he killed himself, his wife and Nietzsche's sister Elizabeth tried to portray him as a hero.

She tried to do the same in her portrayal of her brother to the German Nationalists (future Nazis) soon afterward.

Meanwhile, Nietzsche once described himself as an 'Anti-antisemite.' He HATED the German Nationalists. HATED them.

Bernhard Förster - Wikipedia

@benroyce

Survival of the fittest.

French pugs are the top, the tip, of the food chain.

@benroyce that was fairly obvious in Also sprach Zarathustra TBH.

@obscurestar

obvious to you, because you can think

to morons, not so much

@benroyce I honestly doubt they ever read it. I think the tone of the piece would be hard for them to digest.

@obscurestar

they don't read anything. they don't even read the bible yet call themselves christian, then make a mockery of what jesus said

they're all morons going on vibes programmed like robots by fox news and social media trolls

@benroyce
If we're discussing terms
like "ubermensch" with problematic associations, it's probably going to surprise you that "moron" has its roots in eugenics and white supremacism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_H._Goddard @obscurestar
Henry H. Goddard - Wikipedia

@stib @obscurestar

Correct but it's a general term today, like "idiot"

the r word was originally crafted as a neutral term and now of course is vile ableism

If someone said "i can use the r word with neutral intent because history" you wouldn't buy that

Likewise the contemporary use of the word "moron" is independent of its history

We can't fixate on historical meanings (many words have this problem) in attempt to find malice where there is none. It's just etymologically interesting

@benroyce @obscurestar @stib negative acceleration has a word in physics though. (And I would disagree that idiot is ableism with or without its etymology)

@Kierkegaanks @obscurestar @stib

some people go out of their way to look for offense

there is enough genuinely malicious offense in the world as it is, why invent and contrive offense where none exists

an excellent write up on the vile history of the word "moron" says

"All three words (moron, imbecile, and idiot) now function as general insults"

https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/moron-idiot-imbecile-offensive-history

i don't understand why people can't understand etymology is etymology, and current use and meaning is the only standard

The Clinical History of 'Moron,' 'Idiot,' and 'Imbecile'

The words have a less-than-savory past

@benroyce @obscurestar @stib nobody should have to be insulted!

@Kierkegaanks

definition of moron:

see: trump

definition of idiot:

see: trump

definition of imbecile:

see: trump

@benroyce @obscurestar @stib

@amiserabilist @Kierkegaanks @obscurestar @stib

don't forget the time north korea tried to insult trump in his first term

they used some sort of archaic korean-english translation mechanism

and wound up with an old outdated musty term

that turned out to be unintentional genius:

dotard

the entire english speaking world was like "what?"

then much lol

@benroyce
All true, and I am in no way suggesting that you are
using it as it was originally meant. But I think it's worth noting that there is an element of ableism in saying basically "people who have mistaken beliefs are mentally deficient".
Maybe fools, dupes, grifters, cowards etc instead. @Kierkegaanks @obscurestar

@stib @Kierkegaanks @obscurestar

but it's not an education on a meaning of a word, it's a diseducation on how word meanings shift. it's looking to create ableism, it isn't ableism. why do that? the simple common word usage does not carry the intent, and no one controls language. so why not hew to what the established contemporary meaning is rather than try to control the uncontrollable

@benroyce
I'll have to disagree. Words have power, and carry echoes of history.
There is also the point that denigrating people's intelligence because they adopt a regressive political philosophy ignores the fact that they came to that position for a reason. Simply saying, oh, they're idiots sweeps a lot of stuff under the rug, and denies any chance of dialogue or change.
@Kierkegaanks @obscurestar

@stib @Kierkegaanks @obscurestar

you the know the contemporary meaning is not the historical meaning

but you *choose* to ignore the contemporary meaning. you actively seek to substitute that. you desire to create ableist meaning that isn't there

it's baffling to me why you would do that

isn't life full of enough actual malice. why contrive malice where there is none

@benroyce
I'm confused. My understanding of "moron" means is an unintelligent person. Is this different to your understanding?
I'm not saying that it's malicious, but I do think that there is always benefit in trying to understand how people get to their points of view, starting from the assumption that all people are generally the same, give or take.
Assuming that people who hold objectionable political views are just stupid doesn't seem to me like a useful thing to do.
@Kierkegaanks @obscurestar

@stib @benroyce @obscurestar please stop flogging the dead horse

Or remove me from getting notifications.

@stib @obscurestar

"I do think that there is always benefit in trying to understand how people get to their points of view"

why?

are you trying reeducate MAGA?

what do we do with bigots and prideful ignorant on the fediverse?

we suspend them

is this ableist?

is our job to work with and deprogram MAGA morons in a loving and nurturing fashion?

no, we kick the pieces of shit off. as we should

we call them losers, morons, shitbags, fuckwits, asswipes, etc

what's the problem with that

@obscurestar @benroyce Zarathustra is easy to read, difficult to understand. Not for the simple minded.

Ayn Rand, for example, should never have read it.

@obscurestar @benroyce

Most right wingers can't read for comprehension.

@benroyce people are misgendering Liu? really??!?!?

@blogdiva

i don't think so. wouldn't surprise me though

rather than an aspect of transphobic bigotry specifically here i see it as this typical weak male insecurity and misogyny that a woman should achieve what these toxic idiots idealize, and don't even understand

@benroyce I believe you might enjoy some of Timothy Snyders books. On Freedom perhaps?
@benroyce She was fucking awesome at the Olympics and despite the fact that I'm Canadian I was cheering for her because she was so great.
@benroyce i don’t know why lunatics are drawn to nietzsche. It’s a true mystery

@Kierkegaanks

the appearance of being a rugged hardcore individual, even though they are really being a programmed sheep, is huge in MAGA land. in fact, it may be the defining feature of the entire identity

@benroyce
Clue 1. They had no way of understanding his writing. So they made some shit up. Clue 2. They thought Wagner was about them.